Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wrote out a buch of replies to a number of your posts but forget it. This post of yours is so depressing. I can't even bother.This has never been true of homosexual relationships, in that they are drawn together by eye attraction, sexual performance and through the total sensual "experience".
Hopefully this will make you feel better -- many of us believe evolutionary theory is correct and are for gay marriage. LN in no way speaks for all of us.I wrote out a buch of replies to a number of your posts but forget it. This post of yours is so depressing. I can't even bother.
As long as christians in my real life stay the hell a way from me, I'm all good.
Homosexuality is an abomination, unproductive, and very unhealthy. The body, soul and spirit become infected.
Homosexuality is an abomination, unproductive, and very unhealthy. The body, soul and spirit become infected.
Sometimes the kind and tolerant seem to be few and far between but maybe the negative christians are just louder and get more attention. You're correct though and I'll try to keep that in mind.Hopefully this will make you feel better -- many of us believe evolutionary theory is correct and are for gay marriage. LN in no way speaks for all of us.
You're depressed now, think about how depressing a CHRISTLESS eternity will be....I wrote out a buch of replies to a number of your posts but forget it. This post of yours is so depressing. I can't even bother.
As long as christians in my real life stay the hell a way from me, I'm all good.
I think you believe in zombies but not GOD.I think you've confused homosexuals with zombies
It is hate to tell it exactly like it is, but it is love not to care? Live as you wish but consider yourself forewarned. The only hate I see is from people like yourself directed towards those who are not hurting you but simply saying things you don't want to hear.Let's step back a second here. LN is saying all kinds of horrible things about gay relationships, not the least of which is that they're all about the sex, etc. The bigger answer to this argument is not 'gay relationships are not like that' but 'so what if they are?'
Let's say there are gay relationships that are mostly about sex. Let's say there are straight relationships that are mostly about sex, and there are, no doubt about it. Why is it wrong to have a casual relationship? Why demonise sex in this way, and demonise anyone who desires sex and not a serious and deep relationship?
As long as people are consenting and hurt no one, you have no right to judge how they like to keep themselves happy. If two people, regardless of sexuality, are happy just screwing each other it is none of your business, and passing judgement on their happiness based on your morality is ridiculous. It's not as if they're going to stop just because you personally are offended by their actions, especially when they do not affect you in any way.
Similarly, LN can spout as much vitriol and hate as he wants here, but that will not split up the many, many happy gay relationships around the world. They don't care about opinions like his, or they wouldn't be together in the first place. I also believe gay marraige is just a matter of time, in spite of the anti-gay sentiment we see today from people like LN. Times change, people's attitude changes, and the unacceptable becomes acceptable in the normal course of things. So rather than let ourselves get bogged down in arguments over hate speech, we should look to the future and the happiness it undoubtedly will bring for gay couples.
IRH
In the Latter days men will call good bad and bad good.However infected you believe a homosexual's soul is, yours must be worse or you wouldn't be able to spout evil like this.
You are one of the saddest individuals I have ever met on these forums and that is one stiff competition.
Gay marriage has nothing to do with being happy and gay. Even the homosexual Spartans didn't marry men with men. And your belief in evolution and likely abortion rights, only serves to be a warning to how low a society making up it's own morals will stoop.Hopefully this will make you feel better -- many of us believe evolutionary theory is correct and are for gay marriage. LN in no way speaks for all of us.
Become a monk and prove me wrong.Then we have met very different people.
It seems to me that the people who are obsessed the most with sex are fundamentalists, just as those who are obsessed most with doughnuts are those on diets.
Then don't do it. However, not everyone shares your opinion. Should they then be denied legal rights just because you disagree on moral grounds (even though it doesn't affect you).
No you wouldn't, or you would check out the facts from unbias sources yourself and not wait to pounce on what others have to say that you simply choose to disagree with.I would love for you to back this up with empirical evidence.
In GOD's eyes biblically.In your eyes, perhaps.
Unreproductive, but other than that, no.
Not inherently so.
Again, in your eyes, perhaps. I've had personal experience with gay couples that says wholeheartedly otherwise.
Spiritually fed Christian ethic effectively ended organized overt slavery in both England and the United States. One popular tune for the Women's Sufferage Movement was "Onward Christian Soldiers." The Women's Sufferage Movement and the Temperance League were historically linked to the Revival Movement of the second half of the 19th century.Christian conservatives have no high horse to sit on when it comes to divorce.
Funny how you'll make that assumption about heterosexual couples, but make the opposite about homosexuals.
"Significant other" is generally understood to mean a long-term conjugal partner of either sex.
Neither is the 50 year-old man seeking out the 28 year-old woman. Does the phrase "trophy wife" ring a bell? How about "arm candy"?
1. See above example.
2. You don't suppose this might have anything to do with people like you working to deny their relationships recognition and basically make their lives hell, do you?
Did you think Christianity is the driving force behind that?
More of a way of preserving the virginity of girls until marriage, since women could still be treated as commodities back then, complete with a freshness seal. The only other way of preserving female virginity, historically, has been to divide women into the "marriageable" class and the "disposable" class. Higher-class girls had to remain virgins (or else keep it secret) but the boys could go sow their wild oats with the harlots, the outcasts, the servant girls, what have you. Everyone would then revile said harlots and outcasts so no one cared what became of them. You can still see this dynamic in action today.
Your ideal society, huh?
It is hate to tell it exactly like it is,
but it is love not to care? Live as you wish but consider yourself forewarned.
The only hate I see is from people like yourself directed towards those who are not hurting you but simply saying things you don't want to hear.
I feel that the job of the government is to protect its citizens from foreign invasion. Its job is not to legislate moral standards, but to allows its citizens the ability to establish their own without interference of any kind. That means that if the majority of a community of individuals are against homosexual sex, then they should be able to make it difficult for openly contrary individuals to remain part of the community. They need to find their own place and attempt to sink or swim on the merits of their own beliefs/feeling. It such does not work or causes problems for them, it is not for society at large to bail them out.
In the Latter days men will call good bad and bad good.
Spiritually fed Christian ethic effectively ended organized overt slavery in both England and the United States. One popular tune for the Women's Sufferage Movement was "Onward Christian Soldiers." The Women's Sufferage Movement and the Temperance League were historically linked to the Revival Movement of the second half of the 19th century.
...Moslim [sic] children need moslim [sic] parents. Christian children need a Christian example. Buddhist children need Buddhist parents...
No you wouldn't, or you would check out the facts from unbias sources yourself and not wait to pounce on what others have to say that you simply choose to disagree with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?