• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Universalism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tissue

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2004
2,686
114
36
Houghton, New York
Visit site
✟25,906.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The end of the torment is a free gift here and now.

Why not also after death?

God is a loving God and because He is a loving God He does not force His love on those that choose not to love Him. Forced love is no love at all.

More than God desires love, God desires to pour out His love, and part of this pouring out is salvation.

Again I ask, what kind of parent withholds from his/her child an infinitely good blessing simply because that child is ignorant of what is best for him/her?

An autistic child may not understand that he/she needs food, and may not want food, but a loving parent provides food.

God is also just (justice) and an infinite, atemporal God demands an infinite, atemporal punishment.

Yeah? Infinite punishment for a finite crime? That isn't just.

If God were truly just, as you say, then Jesus would never have been sent. God is just, but God is more merciful than He is just. Does God's mercy only extend to some?

God so love the world that he sent His only begotten son to die for us so that those that believe in Him could be saved.

Universalists affirm that believe in Jesus is necessary for salvation. They add, however, that many will believe after death.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,621
4,394
On the bus to Heaven
✟95,901.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why not also after death?



More than God desires love, God desires to pour out His love, and part of this pouring out is salvation.

Again I ask, what kind of parent withholds from his/her child an infinitely good blessing simply because that child is ignorant of what is best for him/her?

An autistic child may not understand that he/she needs food, and may not want food, but a loving parent provides food.



Yeah? Infinite punishment for a finite crime? That isn't just.

If God were truly just, as you say, then Jesus would never have been sent. God is just, but God is more merciful than He is just. Does God's mercy only extend to some?



Universalists affirm that believe in Jesus is necessary for salvation. They add, however, that many will believe after death.

Two questions:

1. How long do you estimate that non believers will have to serve in God's jail before they are paroled to heaven? Before you answer this remember that God is outside of time. He is atemporal.

2. Is God going to reconcile the fallen angels? Was there sin in heaven?
 
Upvote 0

PT Calvinist

Legend
Jun 19, 2009
1,376
115
Texas - Near the Coast
✟24,544.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Tissue....

The only way a human being can be deeply and truly happy...is in a relationship with God. Jesus Christ is the second Person of the Trinity, the only God that exists. So...if you reject Jesus, you reject the only God that exists, if you reject the only God that exists, you reject your own happiness.

So in hell, it's not that God is torturing us but that we're simply experiencing the inevetable misery of happiness when we reject the only happiness for which we were made.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
L

LightSeaker

Guest
Tissue....

The only way a human being can be deeply and truly happy...is in a relationship with God. Jesus Christ is the second Person of the Trinity, the only God that exists. So...if you reject Jesus, you reject the only God that exists, if you reject the only God that exists, you reject your own happiness.
This makes one wonder why so many who do not have a relationship with God are as deeply and as truly happy as any person who loves Jesus Christ.

That Universalist side of me thinks it's because there is no limit to God as many believe there is.

.
 
Upvote 0

heavensprings

Jesus loves me this I know...
Jun 22, 2004
311
20
seated in heavenly places
✟15,550.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Two questions:

1. How long do you estimate that non believers will have to serve in God's jail before they are paroled to heaven? Before you answer this remember that God is outside of time. He is atemporal.

True. There is no time in the eternals, for eternal life is to KNOW God.

However, can I ask, how long does it take for a man to come to the end of himself in this lifetime before He bows the knee? Is there a set time recorded in the scriptures?

When Paul said he wanted the parishioner to be handed over to satan for the destruction of the flesh, did he give a time frame?

You see scripture doesn't give us formula's and timeline's, so the question is really unfair

2. Is God going to reconcile the fallen angels? Was there sin in heaven?

There is and was and never will be, sin in heaven.

It's up to God to judge the angels, but we must remember that the work of reconciling has already been done.

Col 1:20 and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven.

I tend to believe the scripture that says all things are reconciled, angels are part of the all things I'm sure.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,621
4,394
On the bus to Heaven
✟95,901.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
True. There is no time in the eternals, for eternal life is to KNOW God.

However, can I ask, how long does it take for a man to come to the end of himself in this lifetime before He bows the knee? Is there a set time recorded in the scriptures?

When Paul said he wanted the parishioner to be handed over to satan for the destruction of the flesh, did he give a time frame?

You see scripture doesn't give us formula's and timeline's, so the question is really unfair

Actually, the bible does give us a time line. For redemption in Christ, the bible tells us that it is in this lifetime.

Hebrews 9:27
27 And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment,


There is and was and never will be, sin in heaven.

It's up to God to judge the angels, but we must remember that the work of reconciling has already been done.

Col 1:20 and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven.

I tend to believe the scripture that says all things are reconciled, angels are part of the all things I'm sure.

Actually, there was sin in heaven. The nature of sin is disobedience of God. The fallen angels disobeyed God in the same way that Adam disobeyed God. They made their choices. The fallen angels were casted into hades because God is righteous and hates sin. Jesus effectual atonement are for those that believe which makes it conditional not universal. The fallen angels made a choice and by that choice are now condemned for eternity. Christ sacrifice does not extend to them.

universal reconciliation is nothing more than an earthly hope. Unfortunately, the bible is clear that many will choose not to love God and believe. Those have made their choice. Christ's atonement is potentially universal but effectively conditional. The bible is clear about this.
 
Upvote 0

CaDan

I remember orange CF
Site Supporter
Jan 30, 2004
23,298
2,832
The Society of the Spectacle
✟134,677.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
universal reconciliation is nothing more than an earthly hope. Unfortunately, the bible is clear that many will choose not to love God and believe. Those have made their choice. Christ's atonement is potentially universal but effectively conditional. The bible is clear about this.

No. It is not. There are various passages giving various soteriologies and various eschatologies. You have chosen one story and will interpret all other passages to fit into that story. There are other stories and they also have Scriptural support.
 
Upvote 0

heavensprings

Jesus loves me this I know...
Jun 22, 2004
311
20
seated in heavenly places
✟15,550.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Actually, the bible does give us a time line. For redemption in Christ, the bible tells us that it is in this lifetime.

Hebrews 9:27
27 And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment,

Actually that's not right. Read the sentence, all it says is that it is appointed for men to die once.... btw... men are judged in this life too, it does not all wait until after death. Another thing... it says it is appointed for men to die once... what of Lazarus and those who were/are raised from the dead? Do they not die again. I believe the meaning of this verse is not so plain as you would like.


Actually, there was sin in heaven. The nature of sin is disobedience of God. The fallen angels disobeyed God in the same way that Adam disobeyed God. They made their choices. The fallen angels were casted into hades because God is righteous and hates sin. Jesus effectual atonement are for those that believe which makes it conditional not universal. The fallen angels made a choice and by that choice are now condemned for eternity. Christ sacrifice does not extend to them.

Where does the scripture say there was sin in heaven?

If you are referring to Lucifer being a fallen angel that was found with sin in his heart in heaven then you are believing a hoax.. a lie.

Jesus said his atonement was for ALL ~ while we were YET sinners. Do you understand what that word means..... YET? It means God did His work before anyone chose anything.

universal reconciliation is nothing more than an earthly hope. Unfortunately, the bible is clear that many will choose not to love God and believe. Those have made their choice. Christ's atonement is potentially universal but effectively conditional. The bible is clear about this.

I have noticed that in these discussions people will come out with their own opinions about universal reconciliation like this... why?

Would you like me to keep confirming in every post that the belief in eternal torment is blasphemous and denigrates God?
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No. It is not. There are various passages giving various soteriologies and various eschatologies. You have chosen one story and will interpret all other passages to fit into that story. There are other stories and they also have Scriptural support.
No, the others choose a few and try to invalidate OTHER passages
by their personal interpretations of what they have to mean.

When other scriptures refute a doctrine, that doctrine should be
thrown into the trash bin. Instead, people like a doctrine SO much,
that they force other scripture to become void to hold onto it
at any cost; no matter HOW much it makes the bible contradictory
or heretical elsewhere.

They have CREATED "scriptural support" by taking things outside
their context, and reading in meaning; as well as making up
their own definitions for words and even God's own attributes.
 
Upvote 0

heavensprings

Jesus loves me this I know...
Jun 22, 2004
311
20
seated in heavenly places
✟15,550.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
No, the others choose a few and try to invalidate OTHER passages
by their personal interpretations of what they have to mean.

When other scriptures refute a doctrine, that doctrine should be
thrown into the trash bin. Instead, people like a doctrine SO much,
that they force other scripture to become void to hold onto it
at any cost; no matter HOW much it makes the bible contradictory
or heretical elsewhere.

They have CREATED "scriptural support" by taking things outside
their context, and reading in meaning; as well as making up
their own definitions for words and even God's own attributes.


2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure the sound doctrine; but, having itching ears, will heap to themselves teachers after their own lusts;
2Ti 4:4 and will turn away their ears from the truth, and turn aside unto fables.


Paul wrote this, I'm sure with tears in his heart, knowing that in the centuries to come men would turn from the truth, and sure enough, by the 400's men had turned to fables, and brought pagan beliefs into the Church. And so came the Dark Ages....

Orthodox teachers have added pagan myths through the carnality and darkness of their own minds, and now at the end of time, when the Church should be a shining light, she stills clings to the darkness of the past...such is the power of tradition.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Originally Posted by Hentenza

universal reconciliation is nothing more than an earthly hope. Unfortunately, the bible is clear that many will choose not to love God and believe. Those have made their choice. Christ's atonement is potentially universal but effectively conditional. The bible is clear about this.

No. It is not. There are various passages giving various soteriologies and various eschatologies. You have chosen one story and will interpret all other passages to fit into that story. There are other stories and they also have Scriptural support.

It is not a story. It is the Word of the living God. It will accomplish what He sends it to do and will not return to Him void. His children believe what He says because they love Him and fear/respect Him, and take Him at His Word, for He does not lie.

"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." ~Hebrews 4:12

"This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away." ~2 Timothy 3:1-5
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure the sound doctrine; but, having itching ears, will heap to themselves teachers after their own lusts;
2Ti 4:4 and will turn away their ears from the truth, and turn aside unto fables.


Paul wrote this, I'm sure with tears in his heart, knowing that in the centuries to come men would turn from the truth, and sure enough, by the 400's men had turned to fables, and brought pagan beliefs into the Church. And so came the Dark Ages....
Yes, and I'm positive that he had false doctrines such as
Universalism in mind which lead people to a false sense of
spiritual complacency that they'll all end up in heaven at the
end anyways and would have no reason to know the true and
Living God becuz they don't care about His sacrifice.

I'm sure He envisioned the Rich man scenario in his mind over
and over again as people were in torment due to their separation
from God becuz they refused to believe in faith and recieve so
great a sacrifice from Jesus Christ who COULD HAVE pardoned
them thru their faith.

Once God is proven in the afterlife with no more doubts about it,
"FAITH" is off the table. And salvation is thru FAITH, not standing
at a judgment throne trying to get out of what they know is
coming.

TODAY is the day of salvation - while they are alive.
Hentenza is also correct in using the scripture that it's appointed
for us once to die, then judgment.
And that is supported perfectly by the Revelation account -
where they are not seen getting out again, the only one getting
out of Gehenna over time is Satan, and that's to allow him an
opportunity to put another generation to the test once they've
tasted of God's goodness.
Why is there no mention of the unrepentant lost getting out there???
(where it SHOULD be taught clearly for such a hugely important
doctrine!!) :o :o :o (if it were true)...

Orthodox teachers have added pagan myths through the carnality and darkness of their own minds, and now at the end of time, when the Church should be a shining light, she stills clings to the darkness of the past...such is the power of tradition
Pagan myths?
How about the MYTH that people repent & get saved after they
reach Gehenna! ^_^
Maybe you can find this 'true doctrine' in Revelation where it
explains the judgment and restoration collectively.
Can you find me that ANYWHERE IN THE BIBLE where people
are repenting AFTER judgment and God comes back to review
their pleadings & conversions?
Then lets them out and releases them with the Saints?

I'd love to see your doctrine spelled out instead of READ IN
everywhere you want to redefine word meanings and rip
scriptures out of their contexts.

And as another poster asked, why in the world is Satan re-released
to test later generations at all if they all get into heaven anyways?

How pointless could God get? (and cruel to boot).

Lastly again, let me rehearse this ideal for you - since so many
Uvi's like to attack us "fire & brimstone/fear" folks:

Universalism teaches an identical fear factor/ and torment factor
since they claim that it's AFTER people pay for their sins that they
repent & get back out.
That is putting them thru torment and thru their fear and pain,
THEY REPENT? Sorry, but that's not any different than those
you attack.

Further, if they pay for their sins they didn't repent of, then they're
being paid for twice; once by Jesus and then on their own account.
Since when are sins paid twice?
And how does MAN pay for sin at all?

The serious problems with this false doctrine abound.
 
Upvote 0

PT Calvinist

Legend
Jun 19, 2009
1,376
115
Texas - Near the Coast
✟24,544.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Allow me to demonstrate a twisting of words used comonly by universalists, "God is more powerful than man's hate, He is more powerful than their unwillingness to conform to Him"

This is true...but. They go on to say..."Therefore, because God is more powerful than man, man has no choice but to go to heaven."
As much as I'd like to believe this...it's faulty. it's an illogical leap.
God is not overcome by our hate...God is not overcome by our unwillingness. Why would God pull someone into heaven who hates Him? So they can hate Him more? Now of course if you believe in Universalism...you deny freewill. You use the common defense of..."well, they'll be transformed by God Himself". First of all You haven't answered my first question...now about this "transformed buisness" this is entirely wrong. How? Because sin was able to dwell in heaven before the time of Adam and Eve. The Bible wouldn't have that Lucifer built His throne higher than God out of "a hunger for power" if sin wasn't able to exist in heaven. Now what did God do to Lucifer? He cast him down...This tells me that sin is able to exist in heaven. It also tells me that God dosen't like sin in heaven. So answer me this, "Why did God throw Lucifer out of heaven rather than just transform Him?"

Perfect Love lived on the earth 2,000 years ago and they rejected Him...
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,621
4,394
On the bus to Heaven
✟95,901.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actually that's not right. Read the sentence, all it says is that it is appointed for men to die once.... btw... men are judged in this life too, it does not all wait until after death. Another thing... it says it is appointed for men to die once... what of Lazarus and those who were/are raised from the dead? Do they not die again. I believe the meaning of this verse is not so plain as you would like.

The meaning is plain. A person dies then there is judgment. The verse does not support a reconciliation after death. Lazarus and others are unique miracles of God. You are comparing apples to oranges.


Where does the scripture say there was sin in heaven?

If you are referring to Lucifer being a fallen angel that was found with sin in his heart in heaven then you are believing a hoax.. a lie.
When did the angels sin? Was it before or after creation?

Jesus said his atonement was for ALL ~ while we were YET sinners. Do you understand what that word means..... YET? It means God did His work before anyone chose anything.
Jesus did indeed said that His atonement was for all, however, Jesus also said that a person has to believe to receive the atonement. There are a multitude of verses to support this. Here is a couple:

1 Timothy 4:10
10 For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men [potentially], especially [actually] of those who believe. (bracketed words mine)

And why it is potentially:

Romans 5:8-11
8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him. 10 For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life. 11 And not only that, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the reconciliation. [Bold mine]

We, the believer, are reconciled to God by justification which is by faith through grace. The unfaithful is not justified. Can you find any verses that says that the unfaithful is or will be justified?

I have noticed that in these discussions people will come out with their own opinions about universal reconciliation like this... why?
Because universalism is merely an opinion but worse because it has no biblical basis.

Would you like me to keep confirming in every post that the belief in eternal torment is blasphemous and denigrates God?
Only after you can provide biblical support.
 
Upvote 0

Tissue

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2004
2,686
114
36
Houghton, New York
Visit site
✟25,906.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Allow me to demonstrate a twisting of words used comonly by universalists, "God is more powerful than man's hate, He is more powerful than their unwillingness to conform to Him"

This is true...but. They go on to say..."Therefore, because God is more powerful than man, man has no choice but to go to heaven."
As much as I'd like to believe this...it's faulty. it's an illogical leap.
God is not overcome by our hate...God is not overcome by our unwillingness. Why would God pull someone into heaven who hates Him? So they can hate Him more? Now of course if you believe in Universalism...you deny freewill. You use the common defense of..."well, they'll be transformed by God Himself". First of all You haven't answered my first question...now about this "transformed buisness" this is entirely wrong. How? Because sin was able to dwell in heaven before the time of Adam and Eve. The Bible wouldn't have that Lucifer built His throne higher than God out of "a hunger for power" if sin wasn't able to exist in heaven. Now what did God do to Lucifer? He cast him down...This tells me that sin is able to exist in heaven. It also tells me that God dosen't like sin in heaven. So answer me this, "Why did God throw Lucifer out of heaven rather than just transform Him?"

Perfect Love lived on the earth 2,000 years ago and they rejected Him...

The development of love is a process. Transformation is a process. For some, that process begins in this lifetime. For others, it will begin in the next.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,621
4,394
On the bus to Heaven
✟95,901.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The development of love is a process. Transformation is a process. For some, that process begins in this lifetime. For others, it will begin in the next.

Biblical support?
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The development of love is a process. Transformation is a process. For some, that process begins in this lifetime. For others, it will begin in the next.
THIS LIFE is the springboard for the next.

What good is learning in the next when the next is what hinged
on THIS one?
There is no more "learning" once God is proven and you had your
chance at salvation thru faith and get to the judgment seat
of Christ for evaluation of your lifetime when you were given
GRACE to accept and repent.

Our choices in this life are FOR the next afterlife.
So as Hentenza asks, please prove this theory with
scripture that we have many chances over & over in the
future "ages" (since that's the Uvi's belief of the afterlife).

(by the way, that sounds alot more like reincarnation
than anything)
 
Upvote 0

Tissue

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2004
2,686
114
36
Houghton, New York
Visit site
✟25,906.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Biblical support?

That at the name of Jesus every knee will bow, on heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord to the glory of God the Father.

That's my go-to verse. Clearly, not everyone confesses in this lifetime, so they must in the next. And the word 'confess' carries with it connotations that extend beyond compulsion and toward love and acceptance.
 
Upvote 0

Tissue

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2004
2,686
114
36
Houghton, New York
Visit site
✟25,906.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
THIS LIFE is the springboard for the next.

What good is learning in the next when the next is what hinged
on THIS one?
There is no more "learning" once God is proven and you had your
chance at salvation thru faith and get to the judgment seat
of Christ for evaluation of your lifetime when you were given
GRACE to accept and repent.

Why? I've asked this question throughout this thread, and I've yet to hear a good reason why this is so. Why is Jesus sacrifice no longer efficacious after death? Why is human free will, for which a loving God is supposedly willing to sacrifice billions, no longer capable of making a decision for Christ after death? Is Jesus not powerful enough? Will human beings be made into determined animals after death? Or will it only be the ones that go to hell that become determined?

Our choices in this life are FOR the next afterlife.
So as Hentenza asks, please prove this theory with
scripture that we have many chances over & over in the
future "ages" (since that's the Uvi's belief of the afterlife).

See the verse in my post above. See my questions above. See the philosophical question I've been presenting throughout this thread.

(by the way, that sounds alot more like reincarnation
than anything)

Reincarnation is the belief that people will come back to this state of life in a new body, without any memory of the life before. How is that anything like what I've been talking about?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.