• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Universal Salvation or Universal Reconciliation

Status
Not open for further replies.

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
The Christian Universalist Doctrine of Universal Salvation, or Universal Reconciliation, states that all people, no matter how evil they may be, are created by God; and that God the Father, acting through His Son, Jesus Christ, will eventually bring all people back to Himself and into Heaven.

There is punishment for evildoing, according to God's desire for justice. But this punishment is temporary and not eternal.

Eventually, everyone comes back to God the Father, by Jesus Christ, His Son.

I have been doing some reading on this lately and was wondering what y'all thought about it.

 

jack
 

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by LouisBooth
Just one thought would be is if their is universal salvation, they why the worry about repenting?

Thanks for your post!

The reason to repent remains the same. Repentance is the ONLY way of salvation! Without repentance there is no forgieness.

Universal salvation does not deny punishment, or hell.

Hell is a place you do not want to be for one second.

jack
 
Upvote 0

Blackhawk

Monkey Boy
Feb 5, 2002
4,930
73
53
Ft. Worth, tx
Visit site
✟30,425.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Originally posted by websitejack


Thanks for your post!

The reason to repent remains the same. Repentance is the ONLY way of salvation! Without repentance there is no forgieness.

Universal salvation does not deny punishment, or hell.

Hell is a place you do not want to be for one second.

jack

 

now I believe God determines the reaction for every action and that includes the punishment for sin.  So if God wanted the punishement for sin to be temporary He could of made it that way. 

But I think it is clear in the Bible that the punishment for unpaid sin is not temporary. 


Rom 6:23
23 For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
(NAU)

Gen 2:16-17
16 The LORD God commanded the man, saying, "From any tree of the garden you may eat freely;
17 but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die."
(NAU)

Num 18:22
22 "The sons of Israel shall not come near the tent of meeting again, or they will bear sin and die.
(NAU)

Matt 25:41
41 "Then He will also say to those on His left, "Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels;
(NAU)

Matt 25:45-46
45 "Then He will answer them, "Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.'
46 "These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
(NAU)

I think the ones who promote this theory mean well.  They feel that God condemming anyone to hell forever would be unjust and that God is loving and wants all to be in Heaven so much that eternal punishment is unthinkable. 

But I feel that they:

1. Do not understand that God is just and being just is a part of love.

2. They underestimate the terribleness and downright filthiness of sin.  They do not understand how evil it is. 

So I think they are wrong but I hope to win them over by showing them that God is actually more loving to be so gracious as to forgive our terribleness but that love also has to be just so that must mean the flip side if one does not choose to follow Christ.

blackhawk
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Just to clarify what the discussion on this thread is about I wanted to state on the front side what it is not about:

This is not about Unitarian Universalist Faith.

Which according to it's own website http://www.uua.org doesn't acknowledge the most basic Christian foundational tenets:

UU view of the Bible?

"We do not, however, hold the Bible-or any other account of human experience-to be either an infallible guide or the exclusive source of truth. Much biblical material is mythical or legendary. Not that it should be discarded for that reason! Rather, it should be treasured for what it is. We believe that we should read the Bible as we read other books (or the newspaper)-with imagination and a critical eye."

UU view on Jesus?

"Classically, Unitarian Universalist Christians have understood Jesus as a savior because he was a God-filled human being, not a supernatural being. He was, and still is for many UUs, an exemplar, one who has shown the way of redemptive love, in whose spirit anyone may live generously and abundantly."

"Many of us honor Jesus, and many of us honor other master teachers of past or present generations, like Moses or the Buddha. As a result, mixed-tradition families may find common ground in the UU fellowship without compromising other loyalties."

UU view on Salvation?

"The English word salvation derives from the Latin salus, meaning health. Unitarian Universalists are as concerned with salvation, in the sense of spiritual health or wholeness, as any other religious people.

However, in many Western churches, salvation has come to be associated with a specific set of beliefs or a spiritual transformation of a very limited type.

Among Unitarian Universalists, instead of salvation you will hear of our yearning for, and our experience of, personal growth, increased wisdom, strength of character, and gifts of insight, understanding, inner and outer peace, courage, patience, and compassion. The ways in which these things come to, change, and heal us, are many indeed. We seek and celebrate them in our worship."

What this thread's focus is about:

The discussion of Universal Salvation, or Universal Reconciliation in the framework of the following Christian views:

The Bible

The Bible is the Word of God. It is inspired and inerrant in its original autographs. It is a complete and final revelation of God.

God - Jesus

There is one God and only one God. He is personal and knowable. He manifests Himself in three persons: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Christ is God manifest in the flesh, born of a virgin, without sin, and the chosen Messiah who will one day set up his kingdom on earth.

Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins, was buried, rose again from the dead, ascended back to heaven, and will one day return to this earth again.

Salvation

All persons are sinners, guilty before God, deserving of judgment, and in need of a Savior, Jesus Christ our Lord.

Salvation from sin, death, and hell is by God's grace, based on the work of Jesus Christ alone. It is received by faith apart from any human performance or merit.


jack
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
>>what y'all thought about it.


I think that it can all be broken down into three different possible outcomes for those who do not accept God's grace.

1) The view of eternal torment.

2) Punishment and then reconcilaton.

3) Total destruction, annihilation for the unfaithful.

Those are the only three views I have heard from people who believe in God's plan of salvation.

Of course from unbelievers you hear things like: The lake of fire is a great place to vaccation and they plan to do some wind surfing when they get there.

One thing is for sure. God is a God of absolute Justice. If people reject His forgiveness, they will be the first to admit that they are only getting what they rightfully have due to them.

If we ever feel we have been treated unjustly, we can plead our case before God at any time.
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by JohnR7
[BI think that it can all be broken down into three different possible outcomes for those who do not accept God's grace.

1) The view of eternal torment.

2) Punishment and then reconcilaton.

3) Total destruction, annihilation for the unfaithful.

Those are the only three views I have heard from people who believe in God's plan of salvation. [/B]

I think you have captured it in a nutshell JohnR7.

So what I have been reading about lately is option (2) Punishment and then reconciliation, which touches on (1) eternal torment as well.

Here is some of what I have read in a Savior of the World series
by J. Preston Eby:

---------------------------------------------------
If our Lord Jesus Christ is the Creator and Sustainer of ALL things and ALL people than he either does or allows everything that is done in heaven or on earth.

If one hundred billion helpless human beings are being tortured, then Jesus is doing it. Satan has brought suffering and death to the whole human race. However, if eternal torment IS TRUE, then Jesus Christ will torture forever the whole human race, except the small handful who will be saved.

In one hour, in a hot searing hell, our Lord will inflict more pain and agony on each person than Satan inflicted on that person during his entire life.

The position is stated that NO ONE really believes in an eternal burning hell if we are to judge by their actions.

If they saw a person in a burning building, they would put forth every effort to save them; they would cry and scream for help; they would be late for work; they would not rest until the victims were rescued.

Yet, those who teach eternal torment can spend their hours relaxing in front of the television screen, visiting and feasting upon rich dainties with their friends, and whole days in camping, vacationing, fishing, and playing, and then lay their heads upon a pillow every night and sleep soundly, while, according to their own teaching, countless millions are going to a place a million times worse than a burning building!

It is estimated that about one hundred and sixty billion (160,000,000,000)human beings have lived on the earth in the six thousand years since Adam departed from Eden.

Of these, the very broadest estimate that could be made with reason would be that less than five billion were saints of God. This broad estimate would leave the immense aggregate of one hundred and fifty-five billion (155,000,000,000) who went down into death without faith and hope in the only name given under heaven or among men whereby we must be saved.

Indeed, the vast majority of these never knew or heard of Jesus, and could not believe in Him of whom they had not heard.

Would it not seem that if God truly loved the world so much He might have made provision, not only that believers might be saved, but that ALL MIGHT HEAR IN ORDER TO BELIEVE?

Again, when we read, "That was the true light that lights every man that comes into the world" (Jn. 1:9), our observation says, Not so; every man has not been enlightened; we cannot see that our Lord has lighted more than a few of earth's billions.

Even in this comparatively enlightened day, millions of heathen give no evidence of such enlightenment; neither do many now living on our street; neither did the Sodomites, nor multitudes of others in past generations and ages.

We read that Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, tasted death "for every man" (Heb. 2:9). But if He tasted death for the one hundred and sixty billions, and from any cause that sacrifice becomes efficacious to only five billion, was not the redemption comparatively a failure?

And in that case, is not the apostle's statement too broad? When again we read, "Behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people" (Lk. 2:10), and looking about us, see that it is only to a "little flock" that it has been good tidings, and not to all people, we would be compelled to wonder whether the angels had not over-stated the goodness and breadth of their message, and overrated the importance of the work to be accomplished by the Christ whom they announced.

Another statement is, "There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all" (I Tim. 2:5-6).

A ransom for ALL? Then why should not all involved have some benefit, from Christ's death? Why should not ALL come to a knowledge of the truth, that they may believe?

Without the KEY, how dark, how inconsistent these statements appear; but when we find the KEY to God's plan, these texts all declare with one voice, "God is love."

This key is found in the latter part of the text last quoted - "Who gave Himself a ransom for all, TO BE TESTIFIED IN DUE TIME."

Ah, God has a "due time" for everything! He could have testified it to these in their past lifetime; but since He did not, it proves that their "due time" must be the future. For those who will be of the Church, the body of Christ, the firstfruits of His redemption, the present is the "due time" to hear and receive; and whosoever now has an ear to hear, let him hear and heed, and he will be blessed accordingly.

Though Jesus paid our ransom before we were born, it was not our "due time" to hear of it for long years afterward, and only the appreciation of it, quickened by the Holy Spirit, brought responsibility; and this, only to the extent of our ability and appreciation.

The same principle applies to all: in God's due time it will be testified to all, and all will then have the glorious opportunity to believe and be blessed by it.

The prevailing opinion is that death ends all opportunity; but there is no Scripture which so teaches; and all the above, and many more Scriptures, would be meaningless, or worse, if death ends all hope for the ignorant masses of the world.
---------------------------------------------------

Jack
 
Upvote 0

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
74
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I've always figures that God would make things much more fair than I could imagine when it comes to judgment. That's why I always frown when I hear another condemn (or say I don't judge them, but God's Word does) a person or whole group of people to hell. I haven't seen it here, yet, but I know churches that bekieve you will go to hell if you don't go to their particular church name and follow their pretty strict rules.
I wonder about what he told those when He, Jesus led captivity captive......freed them that were captive. Can you explain that to me?
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
24
✟21,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
no such thing as all will eventually make it to heaven. Revelations is crystal clear on that.

Re 20:15* And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Re 21:8* But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

"I wonder about what he told those when He, Jesus led captivity captive......freed them that were captive. Can you explain that to me?"

I think verse refers to Jesus leading those in Abraham's bosom up to heaven.
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Here are some passages that the Universal Reconciliation of all proponets use:

GE 12:2 "I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you ."

GE 22:18 "and through your seed all nations on earth will be blessed , because you have obeyed me."

ACT3:20 and that he may send the Christ, who has been appointed for you--even Jesus. He must remain in heaven until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through His holy prophets.

LK 2:10 But the angel said to them, "Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people . 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord.

JN 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world !"

JN 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him .

JN 12:30 Jesus said, "This voice was for your benefit, not mine. 31 Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. 32 But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself ."

2COR 5:18 All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: 19 that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them .

COL 1:19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things , whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.

This is an interesting one...

1CO 15:20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22 For as in Adam all die , so in Christ all will be made alive .

PHIL 2:9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

1CO 12:1 Now about spiritual gifts, brothers, I do not want you to be ignorant. 2 You know that when you were pagans, somehow or other you were influenced and led astray to mute idols. 3 Therefore I tell you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except by the Holy Spirit .

1 TIM 4:9 This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance 10 (and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe . 11 Command and teach these things.

1 TIM 2:3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth . 5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all men --the testimony given in its proper time.

Facinating....

jack
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by Andrew
no such thing as all will eventually make it to heaven. Revelations is crystal clear on that.

Re 20:15* And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Re 21:8* But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.


Andrew,

Every proponet of the eventual reconciliation of all that I have read acknowledges punishment and Hell for those who have not repented and by faith received salvation from sin, death, and hell by God's grace, based on the work of Jesus Christ alone.

The question is really about the duration of hell and if the door closes for the opportunity for repentance at death.

jack
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
24
✟21,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
websitejack,

firstly, all the scriptures you have posted say nothing of all humans that wld ever live receiving salvation and entering heaven.

eg: all peoples/nations just means all tribes/races/nationalities will be blessed. does not equate to all humans that ever lived being blessed. it just means no racism or favouritism.

so in Christ all will be made alive-- the key here is in Christ. not all are in Christ.

gave himself as a ransom for all men -- yeah but that ransom is not forced down all men's throats.

yes salvation/His blood was shed for/offered to ALL men but it does not mean that all men will receive the free gift of salvation.

Secondly, eternal torment in hell is as the Word says eternal. It is not temporary.

Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Mr 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

if we want to argue that eternal punishment may not be eternal, then we might as well argue that eternal life may not be eternal! both contradict scripture.
 
Upvote 0

cougan

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
766
7
53
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Christian
Here is an article I would like to share on this topic.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THE STATEMENT THAT CHRIST "LED CAPTIVITY CAPTIVE" WHEN HE ASCENDED? (Eph. 4:8)

Eph. 4:8 is obviously based upon Ps. 68:18. However, Paul's statement of the Psalm differs somewhat from David's original wording. Perhaps the best place to begin answering the question concerning what Paul means is to harmonize the two passages, which are produced together below:

"Thou hast ascended on high, thou hast led captivity captive: thou hast received gifts for men; yea, for the rebellious also, that the LORD God might dwell among them" (Ps. 68:18).

"Wherefore he saith, When he ascended on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men" (Eph. 4:8).

Attention is directed to major differences between the two passages: (1) There is a change from the second person "thou" (Ps. 68:18) to the third person "He" (Eph. 4:8). (2) There is a change from receiving gifts (Ps. 68:18) to giving gifts (Eph. 4:8). (3) Paul adds, "Wherefore he saith," to introduce his quotation of the Psalm. To whom does the "he" have reference? Does it refer to God, to Christ, or to neither? Lenski suggests that it is better to leave the verb as impersonal (the verb does not indicate gender, which must be determined from context). He renders the expression, "the declaration is," rather than to try and make a choice of one of three options: "God says," "Christ says," or "the Scripture" says.<6>

Some feel that the differences between these passages are slight and are made arbitrarily by Paul to prove his point. Critics state that "such a view, indeed, would open the door to the wildest freaks of interpretation."<7> Some questions come to mind: (1) Is Paul quoting the passage? (2) Is he offering an interpretation of an Old Testament verse? (3) Or, is he using this passage as a typological fulfillment? If the passage is taken as a quotation, there are serious problems that must be faced. How may such changes be explained? If the text is presented as interpretation, it is either a direct fulfillment (as with the virgin birth, Matt. 1:22-23), or, it is typical (as with Rachel weeping for her children (Matt. 2:17-18) and the prophets foreseeing that Christ would be labeled a Nazarene (Matt. 2:23)).

Now, what is the meaning of leading "captivity captive"? In Ps. 68:18 and in Eph. 4:8 the expression is the same in the KJV: "captivity captive." Does the word captivity refer to captivity itself (i.e., the state of being in which men are ensnared) or to individual captives (i.e., those who are captured and led away by a conqueror)? Commentators on the Psalm usually take the view that the immediate application is to the Lord's capturing a host of enemies and leading them in victory. The conquering Lord is the basic thrust of the entire Psalm. Thus Leupold renders the verse: "Thou didst ascend on high; Thou didst lead away captives; Thou didst receive gifts among men..."<8>

However, Lenski observes:

"`He made captive captivity' (verb and noun are used with reference to war captives ...) describes Jehovah (Christ) as the supreme Victor. This is not a cognate accusative or an abstract used for a concrete, `captivity' for `captured ones.' This is a plain accusative and is highly significant as such. `Captivity' itself was taken captive (Col. 2:15); the captivity in which principalities and powers, the hellish kingdom, held and tried to keep men, this was made captive..."<9>

The question concerning Paul's meaning must be answered in such a way as to do justice both to his words and to those of David.


Typological Application Made by Paul

In view of the foregoing it appears to this writer that Paul is making a typological application of the Old Testament passage. Thus Leupold is correct when he states: "He (Paul) apparently regards the Lord's victorious entrance into Jerusalem as a type or figure of Christ's triumphant entry into the heavens, laden with the fruits of His encounter, fruits which He is ready to bestow on His own."<10> Understanding the principle of typology is important. Some abuse the principle and turn the text into allegory and fanciful sermonizing. Paul is not doing this and present-day Bible students dare not.

The Bible provides a basis for typology. Such terms as "type" (Rom. 5:14; 1 Cor. 10:6, 11), "shadow" (Col. 2:17; Heb. 8:5; 10:1), "copy" (Heb. 8:5; 9:23), "sign" (Matt. 12:39), "figure" (Heb. 9:9; 11:19), and "antitype" (Heb. 9:24; 1 Pet. 3:21) should help us know that "type" and "antitype" are a significant part of God's revelation to us in the Bible. Once this concept is grasped, many difficulties in Bible interpretation are solved. Typology is a means of prophetic fulfillment.

In spite of space limitations, the following extended quotation from Broomall is justified on the basis that some readers may not be sure of the meaning and legitimacy of typology:

"A type is a shadow cast on the pages of O.T. history by a truth whose full embodiment or antitype is found in the N.T. revelation. Our survey is limited to a few aspects of this important subject.

"That typology is a legitimate part of theological study is proved by the following considerations: (1) the word [@tupos] and its synonyms are used in such a way as to justify this approach to O.T. history. (2) the "as ... so" construction (e.g., Matt. 12:40; Luke 17:26; John 3:14) indicates a close spiritual affinity between an O.T. fact and its N.T. counterpart. (3) In many places (e.g., 1 Cor. 15:22; 2 Cor. 3:7ff.; Gal. 4:22ff.; Heb. 3:1-10:18) an obvious parallel is drawn between O.T. history and its N.T. interpretation.

"Types have the following characteristics: (1) They are thoroughly rooted in history. Jonah's experience is just as credible as the momentous event which it adumbrates (Matt. 12:40). The serpent episode belongs to the same historical category as the event which it graphically prefigures (John 3:14). (2) They are prophetic in nature. Their "terminus ad quem" is always in messianic times. Melchizedek, the historical figure (Gen. 14), becomes the spiritual prefiguration of Christ's eternal priesthood (Ps. 110; Heb. 7). (3) They are definitely designed as an integral part of redemptive history. Types are not afterthoughts cabalistically read back into the O.T. story. They retain their typical significance even after the antitype has appeared (cf. 1 Cor. 10:1-11). (4) They are Christo-centric. They all point to Christ in one way or another. If the O.T. as a whole centers in Christ (Luke 24:24,44; Acts 3:24ff.), surely the types anticipate his redemption of fallen mankind. (5) They are edificatory -- having spiritual meaning for God's people in both dispensations. The OT saint was undoubtedly edified by the typical significance of such things as circumcision (Deut. 30:6), the sacrifices (Hos. 14:2) and the coronation of Joshua (Zech. 6:9-15). Much of the O.T. (e.g., Exo. 25--40) would have only antiquarian value today if it were not for types embedded in the text."

(To safeguard against extremes Broomall further states?

"A few simple distinctions will safeguard the student of typology. (1) One must distinguish between the type backed by N.T. authority and the type based on the speculation of the modern interpreter. It is not to be inferred, however, that no type is valid unless supported by specific NT authority. (2) One must distinguish between the type that definitely corroborates a doctrine and the type that has no relevance to a supposed doctrine. Jonah's expulsion from the great fish typifies Christ's resurrection (Matt. 12:40); but Jonah's restoration to the land does not necessarily typify Israel's restoration to Palestine. (3) One must distinguish between what is essential in a type and what is peripheral in the same type. Some typologies have become so bogged down in details that absurdities and puerilities have swallowed up the essential truth. (4) One must distinguish between the type that is completely fulfilled in the antitype and the type, though partly fulfilled, that still retains its typical significance for the future world. The Book of Revelation affords many illustrations of this feature of typology (e.g., Rev. 14:1).<11>

What then is the meaning of the statement that Christ "led captivity captive" when He ascended (Eph. 4:8)? Just as the Lord led to victory in times of old, He will lead to victory in the present time. He can not be defeated. The statement in the Psalm is a review of the power of God at work in difficult situations and against great forces of evil.

If the Lord was victorious in the past for His people Israel, how much more do we see of His victory when we contemplate the accomplishments of the Christ in the resurrection and ascension? The movement of God in history is singular in nature. His development of Israel was not for Israel alone. He had in mind the coming of the Christ and His resurrection and ascension. Any captivity that Israel came through victoriously must be credited to the Lord. But any captivity that Israel faced pales in significance when compared to the captivity in which sin and death held humanity until the victory made possible by the Christ (1 Cor. 15:50-57). He has freed us from every shackle of captivity. There could be no greater event than that which He made possible. He truly has led "captivity (itself) captive."

Perhaps the Christian can appreciate this principle better if he tries to imagine life without the Christ. How great would be the bondage? We would have no purpose for life, no direction nor hope for the future. There would be no help for all the things that can be -- must be -- done by frail and failing mankind. How great would be the captivity! We could receive no forgiveness when we fail, which we all do daily. We would be held captive by our own moral shame -- how great would be the bondage! If there is nothing better for us than what is here and now, we are indeed held captive, for the shackles of death hold us. Place the Christ of the Bible into life, and everything that holds one captive is itself shackled and captured by Him. It is tempting to quote a plethora of passages to show the greatness of this liberty in Christ, but the following one must suffice (the reader is urged to read the additional passages cited as well):

"Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free? Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever. If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed" (John 8:31-36; see also Rom. 5:18; 6:18, 22; 8:2; Gal. 4:26; 5:1).
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by cougan
What then is the meaning of the statement that Christ "led captivity captive" when He ascended (Eph. 4:8)? Just as the Lord led to victory in times of old, He will lead to victory in the present time. He can not be defeated. The statement in the Psalm is a review of the power of God at work in difficult situations and against great forces of evil.

If the Lord was victorious in the past for His people Israel, how much more do we see of His victory when we contemplate the accomplishments of the Christ in the resurrection and ascension? The movement of God in history is singular in nature. His development of Israel was not for Israel alone. He had in mind the coming of the Christ and His resurrection and ascension. Any captivity that Israel came through victoriously must be credited to the Lord. But any captivity that Israel faced pales in significance when compared to the captivity in which sin and death held humanity until the victory made possible by the Christ (1 Cor. 15:50-57). He has freed us from every shackle of captivity. There could be no greater event than that which He made possible. He truly has led "captivity (itself) captive."

...If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed" (

An excellent post cougan...There is a passage in Galatians that is one of those life scriptures for my wife and I:

Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.
Gal. 5:1

jack
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by Andrew
websitejack,

firstly, all the scriptures you have posted say nothing of all humans that wld ever live receiving salvation and entering heaven.

eg: all peoples/nations just means all tribes/races/nationalities will be blessed. does not equate to all humans that ever lived being blessed. it just means no racism or favouritism.

Andrew,

Of the 14 verses posted (which is a much smaller number than position paper's list I pulled them from) it seems from the context to mean more than just "no racism or favouritism".

It is the "all", "everything", "the world ", inclusion thing that is interesting...

Originally posted by Andrew
so in Christ all will be made alive-- the key here is in Christ. not all are in Christ.

gave himself as a ransom for all men -- yeah but that ransom is not forced down all men's throats.

yes salvation/His blood was shed for/offered to ALL men but it does not mean that all men will receive the free gift of salvation.

Again, the question is not are all in Christ yet, but will all eventually freely receive the ransom that was paid for them.

So it comes back to what johnR7 said earlier:

"I think that it can all be broken down into three different possible outcomes for those who do not accept God's grace.

1) The view of eternal torment.

2) Punishment and then reconciliation.

3) Total destruction, annihilation for the unfaithful. "



I read an interesting article by a Christian eventual salvation of all proponent, J. Eby Preston entitled "The Law of Circularity"

Here is a direct link to it:

http://www.hisremnant.org/eby/articles/savior/circularity.html

Besides the interesting comparison of those who will be in ever lasting Hell and those who will be in the Kingdom there is an examination of justifications that believers have to create if we hold to the doctrine of everlasting Hell:

(1) IGNORANCE. It is said that although it is true that the great mass of the race have thus far died in their sins, yet it does not follow that they have been lost; for if those who are unavoidably ignorant live up to the light they have, they will be saved. These claim that Paul teaches that IGNORANCE will save men, when he says that "The Gentiles, which have not the law, are a law unto themselves" (Rom. 2:14).

(2) INNOCENCE. Most Christians today tell us that a baby that dies in infancy, or a small child that dies before reaching the "age of accountability," whatever that is, is alright, automatically covered by the blood of Jesus-SAVED! This evidently becomes a SECOND WAY to salvation, since it is apart from FAITH in Jesus Christ. "Oh," they glibly recite, "the little child is INNOCENT, and therefore free from the guilt of any sin." Is that so! The Scripture says otherwise. "Behold, I was shaped in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me" (Ps. 51:5).

So there would actually be three ways into the Kingdom:

(1) Faith in Jesus Christ

(2) Ignorance

(3) Innocence

...which can't possibly true since there is only ONE WAY by which we can be saved.

So, there has to be a different answer.


Originally posted by Andrew
Secondly, eternal torment in hell is as the Word says eternal. It is not temporary.

Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Mr 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

if we want to argue that eternal punishment may not be eternal, then we might as well argue that eternal life may not be eternal! both contradict scripture.

And last but not least, people that present the case for eventual salvation of all, have an argument for the use of and definition of the words "eternal", "everlasting", and "forever and ever"...

I will put that info in the next couple of posts.

websitejack
 
Upvote 0

LouisBooth

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2002
8,895
64
✟19,588.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
"So there would actually be three ways into the Kingdom:

(1) Faith in Jesus Christ

(2) Ignorance

(3) Innocence

...which can't possibly true since there is only ONE WAY by which we can be saved.

So, there has to be a different answer.
"

Umm...2 of three of those can't be done. 1. There are no innocents. Paul says so as much in romans. 2. There are no ignorant, for God has revieled himself to all, thus we do have one way faith in Christ.

Universal salvaiton is quite wrong and denies several verses in the bible.
 
Upvote 0

Slave2SinNoMore

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2002
477
16
58
Visit site
✟947.00
Faith
Christian
Originally posted by websitejack

The position is stated that NO ONE really believes in an eternal burning hell if we are to judge by their actions.

If they saw a person in a burning building, they would put forth every effort to save them; they would cry and scream for help; they would be late for work; they would not rest until the victims were rescued.

Yet, those who teach eternal torment can spend their hours relaxing in front of the television screen, visiting and feasting upon rich dainties with their friends, and whole days in camping, vacationing, fishing, and playing, and then lay their heads upon a pillow every night and sleep soundly, while, according to their own teaching, countless millions are going to a place a million times worse than a burning building!

I wish it were true that all people would eventually wind up in Heaven. But I can't...I just can't. I don't hate God for Hell. I don't understand it, but God is just, so I'll just have to accept it.

But the writer of this article is dead on about the section I have included here. Do we really believe in hell with all our hearts? If we did, we would indeed be moving heaven and earth to prevent people from going to hell .

I am ashamed. I don't witness enough, and I would bet that most people don't. I have a friend that witnesses constantly, but I bet he's in the minority.

We should all let the Holy Spirit speak his words whenever we have the opportunity!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.