How do you explain the concept of Trinity
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
Trying to explain the Trinity with words is not an easy task. And none of the explanations made with words and drawings can explain the Trinity.How do you explain the concept of Trinity
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
How do you explain the concept of Trinity
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
.How do you explain the concept of Trinity
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
Not bad, if one adds the caveat that it is a way to describe it, with flaws. But the description technically is modalism..
....... Similar to the sun in outer space, and her visible light and/or her invisible warmth/heat on earth.
Unfortunately light, radiance, and heat are creations of the sun, they emanate from it, so that would be Arianism.Not claiming this is correct, but this is how the Trinity was explained to me as a teenager. For whatever reason, it made sense...in simple terms....
*The Sun is God the Father.
*The Sun Light is Jesus(Light of the world.)
*The Sun’s energy is the Holy Spirit.
Found this at Creation.com-
The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. … But about the Son he [God] says, “Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.” (Hebrews 1:3,8).So some early church leaders gave the analogy:
- God the Father ~ the sun (but the sun’s very nature is to emit light—God made the sun precisely as a light-giver to earth (Genesis 1:14–19), so they are co-eternal)
- God the Son (wisdom/logos/memra) ~ the radiance continuously emanating from the sun. Jesus is the light of the world (John 1:9–10, 8:12, 9:5).
- God the Holy Spirit ~ the heat from the sun.
Ahhhh....I didn’t know that, thanks. I did read The Sun was a “bad analogy.” It sure made sense as a kid...lol.Unfortunately light, radiance, and heat are creations of the sun, they emanate from it, so that would be Arianism.
First of all, there is a great difference of opinion regarding what the Trinity is. I likely will get yelled at for expressing my opinion, but I believe the Trinity is like a man who is simultaneously a dad, a husband, a son, a banker, or whatever.How do you explain the concept of Trinity
To a child even someone that has a hard time understanding it?
Not yelling, just pointing out that is Modalism. The man changes his identity based on what mode or version of himself is required at the given time.First of all, there is a great difference of opinion regarding what the Trinity is. I likely will get yelled at for expressing my opinion, but I believe the Trinity is like a man who is simultaneously a dad, a husband, a son, a banker, or whatever.
People like to stick labels on other people, but I believe my analysis is correct, and I suspect the majority of Christians who have given this much thought agree with me. I don't believe there are three Gods.Not yelling, just pointing out that is Modalism. The man changes his identity based on what mode or version of himself is required at the given time.
As I have said in other threads, I think there is room in Christianity for other understandings of the Godhead, but Modalism isn't classic Trinitarian thought.
I think you are right, many or even most Christians think of these analogies and don't realize they are heresy according to Trinitarian thought. It's not a bad label to say the analogy is Modalism, it's just a fact. I'm not judging you if you want to believe in Modalism or Arianism, I think there are reasonable reasons to see God in those ways, but it's not Trinitarian.People like to stick labels on other people, but I believe my analysis is correct, and I suspect the majority of Christians who have given this much thought agree with me. I don't believe there are three Gods.
You aren't going to get me to believe there are three Gods.I think you are right, many or even most Christians think of these analogies and don't realize they are heresy according to Trinitarian thought. It's not a bad label to say the analogy is Modalism, it's just a fact. I'm not judging you if you want to believe in Modalism or Arianism, I think there are reasonable reasons to see God in those ways, but it's not Trinitarian.
Modalism isn't three gods, that would be tritheism. But I don't think you believe in that, and it did not seem like it.
ok... Not sure where you are seeing that I am. I certainly do not believe in tritheism or a godhead similar to the LDS Church.You aren't going to get me to believe there are three Gods.
I doubt we'll convince each other of anything, so let me explore your statement about the LDS Church. Do you believe all Mormons believe the exact same things? My own church has a Book of Discipline, but I doubt one percent of us have read it.ok... Not sure where you are seeing that I am. I certainly do not believe in tritheism or a godhead similar to the LDS Church.
I'm really not trying to convince you of anything, I'm simply pointing out the flaw in the analogy used to describe the Trinity since it really describes Modalism. I'm not casting judgment in any way.I doubt we'll convince each other of anything, so let me explore your statement about the LDS Church. Do you believe all Mormons believe the exact same things? My own church has a Book of Discipline, but I doubt one percent of us have read it.
I am comfortable with my belief about the Trinity. There is one God. He came to earth as Jesus Christ, God in flesh, the Son. He communicates with us with his spirit - the Holy Spirit. This is his triune nature. I'm not going to believe there are Gods who rule in union with each other.I'm really not trying to convince you of anything, I'm simply pointing out the flaw in the analogy used to describe the Trinity since it really describes Modalism. I'm not casting judgment in any way.
As for LDS, I really don't know, I haven't had conversations with more than a few, but they held very similar beliefs to each other. I would suspect they hold various beliefs on different matters, but the nature of the Godhead is pretty well defined for them, and easier to understand than the Trinity.