Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You just claimed that no one else ever used it.
God is not so shallow as to allow TRUTH to be imparted to only one writer.
"Paul is the only one in the Bible who uses this phrase.
It's found 11 times in his writings."
And revealed to no other person,
in history? God is bigger than that.
It is true that only Paul used the term ''not under law'' but as it refers to not being under righteousness of obeying the law the same thing can be read by others with different words:You just claimed that no one else ever used it.
God is not so shallow as to allow TRUTH to be imparted to only one writer.
"Paul is the only one in the Bible who uses this phrase.
It's found 11 times in his writings."
And revealed to no other person,
in history? God is bigger than that.
He was not very bright. One of the worst sinners ever in history."Paul is the only one in the Bible who uses this phrase.
It's found 11 times in his writings."
He was not very bright. One of the worst sinners ever in history.
Good, I'm glad someone finally brought this up. I read a bit of the topic. It looked like a guaranteed headache, so I stayed out of it.(CLV) Mt 25:46
And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian."
Kind of hard to get around this one:
(CLV) 1Co 9:21
to those without law as without law (not being without God's law, but legally (εννομος) Christ's), that I should be gaining those without law.
...But somehow they seem to skim right over it.
Rather, you gave me interpretation of OT scripture based on your bias, but against apostolic teaching.I gave you scripture. You gave me your interpretation, of unspecified scripture.
You deny scripture? If so, you deny the teachings of Yahshua.
I can't explain it better the sweet sweet holy Spirit did through Paul. Christ said He didn't come to abolish the law.. He came to fulfill it. Something no man could do. Yet.. some treat this as if what Christ DID never happened.
What Jesus did.. the Fathers ways are written in/on my heart. Hes never treated me like a puppet or a slave. Never told me once to keep anything.. to do anything. He never wanted that. I WANT to do it.. its AWESOME!
He fulfilled the law..its done.
Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
Not exactly.Christ said He didn't come to abolish the law.
Rather, you gave me interpretation of OT scripture based on your bias, but against apostolic teaching.
Show me the NT, APOSTOLIC testimony that confirms your belief that there will be future levitical, ceremonial Blood animal sacrifices for atonement of sins in a future Temple complex in, as you said, The "kingdom to Come" (A position Jesus and the Apostles all taught AGAINST.)
Until you do so, your position remains not only unapostolic, but anti-apostolic, and anti-christic, and therefore must be rejected.
Christ's law (not the same as the law, or God's law)
No, they didn’t love God. They were more interested in obeying their own commandments, and not God’s. In fact, their commandments caused them to disobey God’s commandments Mark 7:1-13Did the leaders of the Pharisees of Jesus day love God? They didn't want to obey the entire law, true, but what is often termed the legalistic law they were most eager to follow
No, they didn’t love God.
Galatians 3:1-3Paul speaks of many categories of law; but the evidence seems to support that Messiah's law is YHWH's law.
Categories?Paul speaks of many categories of law...
Yahshua set an example of how for us to behave in a way that is in the father's will.
Categories?
Many categories of law?
Just because a phrase has the word "law" in it does not automatically connect it to the law that God gave to the Israelites alone through Moses.
As soon as you add the word "of" behind "the law" (the law of...) , it no longer has anything to do with the law that God gave to the Israelites alone through Moses.
And many times a reference to "the law" (the Law - capital "L") means the books. I love this scripture which uses both.
Romans 3:21
But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify.
There's your problem methinks.
We no longer need to 'comply' with a bunch of rules
The Law of Faith (Ch 3)
Righteousness/justification of faith in Christ
A Different Law (Ch 7)
A law of the flesh
The Law of My Mind (Ch 7)
God’s law
The Law of Sin (Sin's Law) (Ch 7)
Transgressing God’s laws
God's Law (Ch 7)
The law handed down at Sanai
The Spirit's Law of Life (Ch 8)
love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control
The Law of Sin and Death (Ch 8)
Righteousness of obeying the law handed down at Sanai
The Law of Righteousness (Ch 9)
What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith; 31 but the people of Israel, who pursued the law as the way of righteousness, have not attained their goal. 32 Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but as if it were by works
Or righteousnes of obeying the law
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?