Unbelievable! Beyond Words!

[FreeinChrist]

Yes I got it you are still trying to blame the victim. The choice that lead to the death of the teen was the decision of the teen to kill someone.

Trayvon is the victim. He is dead. He was followed by a man with a gun and should have hurried faster away, but he is a teen. Zimmerman, who is NOT the victim, chose to carry his gun and follow Trayvon around, playing vigilante.
Zimmerman's attempt to sue the parents was supremely dumb.

 

[BigDaddy4]

The topic was about Zimmerman's lawsuit against the parents of Trayvon Martin. The judge dismissed it.

You are the only one mentioning BLM.

Again, context escapes you. Try reading what I actually responded to.

 

[FreeinChrist]

Again, context escapes you. Try reading what I actually responded to.

I did. Ditto.

 

[Ophiolite]

Yes we could look at the facts or we could cloud the facts with emotion but what we cannot allow is victim bashing or attempting to characterize someone who every effort to murder another person as a heroic victim, rewriting the facts to conform to our beliefs that one group of people are always the victims and the other group are always the oppressors is not only dishonest, it also leads to innocent people being used and becoming victims themselves, being a Christian includes the responsibility to prevent that.

Good advice. I encourage you to take it.

 

[BigDaddy4]

I did. Ditto.

It's unfortunate you did not demonstrate it. But whatever...

 

[BasedLuther]

And believe me, there are tens of millions who don't need any proof that Zimmerman should have been convicted.

Good thing those people weren't on the jury. In civilized societies, one is innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Not "Guilty if those who scream the loudest say so"

 

[Fantine]

Juries aren't infallible and sometimes murderers are set free. The police ordered him not to interfere.

 

[ToddNotTodd]

All of which has nothing to do with the fact that Zimmerman was having his head bashed in at the time he shot the person who had no reason what so ever to attack him. Martin was trying to kill Zimmerman and got exactly what he earned.

Show that any of your statements are actually facts.

 

[BasedLuther]

Juries aren't infallible and sometimes murderers are set free. The police ordered him not to interfere.

Sometimes murderers are indeed free. Like "the summer of love" last year, where BLM and its adherents committed murder in cold blood and hasn't faced justice for it.

But that's unrelated to this matter, where a jury saw and heard the evidence, and found him not-guilty of murder. Police did indeed tell him to not interfere - but that still does not make him guilty of murder.

 

[disciple Clint]

Good advice. I encourage you to take it.

Thank you for your attitude.

 

[Fantine]

His actions following his acquittal show his true character (or lack thereof). It is hard to believe anyone could be so callously unkind as to sue grieving parents when his actions were the source of their grief.

 

[disciple Clint]

Show that any of your statements are actually facts.

show me that you missed all the televised coverage of the trial and cannot find any of the articles that are available on a simple Google search, I am not here to play show me games but if that is what you want to do, go right ahead.

 

[Ophiolite]

Thank you for your attitude.

Really! You make provocative, insensitive posts, displaying zero compassion, then complain when you are called on them.

 

[ToddNotTodd]

show me that you missed all the televised coverage of the trial and cannot find any of the articles that are available on a simple Google search, I am not here to play show me games but if that is what you want to do, go right ahead.

I haven't found anything yet online that indicates that what you were saying are "facts". So unless you can provide something to back up your own statements, I don't think there's any reason for anyone here to believe them.