Ukraine scandal explained.

[DaisyDay]

Not only do countries have beliefs, they have religions. You are deeply mistaken with this pointless and glib remark.

No, they don't. The people in the countries may or may not have religions. You are anthropomorphizing.

As I said your google selection isn't evidence, the first one is an unsourced opinion, and you didn't even link the other. I'm not going to read "articles that show up in your google search". If you have evidence, give it. Citing peoples opinions is not evidence.

You're mistaken.

Calling someone that gives their opinion publicly a pundit is a pointless use of the word since that makes everyone a pundit.

Not everyone does give their opinion publicly. Fewer still do it on a political video channel on a regular basis.

Using it that way in contrast with journalist makes even less sense.

Would you prefer airbag?

 

[Sanoy]

No, they don't. The people in the countries may or may not have religions. You are anthropomorphizing.

You're mistaken.

Not everyone does give their opinion publicly. Fewer still do it on a political video channel on a regular basis.

Would you prefer airbag?

Countries are the unification of People daisy, that is what they are, and they have shared beliefs. You also clearly didn't even read the link far enough to know what a civil religion is.

You can show I am mistaken by presenting the evidence. There is no reason to reply without it.

 

[whatbogsends]

You linked me his channel which I go to daily, and never explained the logic of you accusation. Please explain how criticizing the left as a disaffected liberal means he is right?

I linked his channel so that anyone in this thread that wanted to see for themselves could view his content. His content isn't simply "criticizing" the left. He embraces far right talking points in each one of his videos.

You claim to be a "die hard conservative" yet you are criticizing me who is also conservative, so I guess that makes you on the left then. Thanks for clearing that up.

I absolutely claimed in post #49 that i'm a die-hard conservative. Is my self proclamation the end-all and be-all of how you view me, or are you able to make a determination on your own where you think i stand on the political spectrum?

 

[Sanoy]

I linked his channel so that anyone in this thread that wanted to see for themselves could view his content. His content isn't simply "criticizing" the left. He embraces far right talking points in each one of his videos.



I absolutely claimed in post #49 that i'm a die-hard conservative. Is my self proclamation the end-all and be-all of how you view me, or are you able to make a determination on your own where you think i stand on the political spectrum?

You quoted me when you linked it, which is not required to 'link his channel so that anyone in the thread could see it'. Nor did you claim this when I asked you why you were linking it, but instead doubled down on revealing the content to me. Your last claim, that he embraces far right talking points, is unsourced, and pure opinion.

I believe you are as you claim to be, a die-hard conservative, until there is evidence that shows otherwise. However the same accusations you use against Tim can be made right back at you under the same paradigm.

 

[whatbogsends]

You quoted me when you linked it, which is not required to 'link his channel so that anyone in the thread could see it'. Nor did you claim this when I asked you why you were linking it, but instead doubled down on revealing the content to me. Your last claim, that he embraces far right talking points, is unsourced, and pure opinion.

I believe you are as you claim to be, a die-hard conservative, until there is evidence that shows otherwise. However the same accusations you use against Tim can be made right back at you under the same paradigm.

The claim that he embraces far right talking points was explicitly supported in this thread. Your denial of that evidence doesn't mean it's "unsourced". I don't need a media outlet to write a claim that someone is embracing far right talking points when I can hear them come directly from that person's mouth.

If you would like to borrow my shovel to get rid of all that sand, please let me know.

 

[Sanoy]

The claim that he embraces far right talking points was explicitly supported in this thread. Your denial of that evidence doesn't mean it's "unsourced". I don't need a media outlet to write a claim that someone is embracing far right talking points when I can hear them come directly from that person's mouth.

If you would like to borrow my shovel to get rid of all that sand, please let me know.

The claim that he embraces far right talking points is an opinion until evidence is shown that he embraces far right talking points. There is no purpose in replying without that evidence because your unqualified opinion of Tim Pools 'secret' personal beliefs means nothing to me, nor should it for anyone. I am certain that if it was I who was making a claim like this you would demand evidence from me. That is no less important when it comes to your own claims.