- May 29, 2012
- 41,108
- 24,136
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
It’s been in the news and everything.An offer it couldn't refuse?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It’s been in the news and everything.An offer it couldn't refuse?
What has been in the news and everything?It’s been in the news and everything.
Trump’s shakedown phone call trying to get Ukraine to find dirt on Biden.What has been in the news and everything?
I am aware of the phone call, but there is far more going on to pursue than Bidens meager role which wasn't even illegal. The "shakedown"/mafia references are confusing to me, I don't know what you are referring to.Trump’s shakedown phone call trying to get Ukraine to find dirt on Biden.
You must not be familiar with American organized crime terminology. Trump operates like the head of an organized crime syndicate. Sorry to have confused you.I am aware of the phone call, but there is far more going on to pursue than Bidens meager role which wasn't even illegal. The "shakedown"/mafia references are confusing to me, I don't know what you are referring to.
I caught the reference I just don't see where it meets with reality.You must not be familiar with American organized crime terminology. Trump operates like the head of an organized crime syndicate. Sorry to have confused you.
Then you have not kept up. Don’t have time to rehash the impeachment inquiry background.I caught the reference I just don't see where it meets with reality.
I feel I have kept up, even with the impeachment inquiry. Perhaps it's because we don't listen to the same news.Then you have not kept up. Don’t have time to rehash the impeachment inquiry background.
What sources you using?I feel I have kept up, even with the impeachment inquiry. Perhaps it's because we don't listen to the same news.
I listen and read the MSM, but filter it with a conservative and liberal view. Mostly Tim Pool who is left of center, and Glenn who is an independent conservative. Who do you use to get a broad perspective?What sources you using?
Certainly not Beck. Let’s assume Beck is mostly correct. The GOP has made no legitimate move to investigate Biden activities in Ukraine.I listen and read the MSM, but filter it with a conservative and liberal view. Mostly Tim Pool who is left of center, and Glenn who is an independent conservative. Who do you use to get a broad perspective.
You have told me who you don't listen to, but not who you do listen to help give you a broad perspective.Certainly not Beck. Let’s assume Beck is mostly correct. The GOP has made no legitimate move to investigate Biden activities in Ukraine.
Trump asked Ukraine to reopen an investigation as a “favor” in exchange for the release of already approved military aid.
Even if everything about Biden is true, Trump abused the power of the office.
From RationalWiki:I listen and read the MSM, but filter it with a conservative and liberal view. Mostly Tim Pool who is left of center, and Glenn who is an independent conservative. Who do you use to get a broad perspective?
Given that I stated that I frequent him a lot, why did you think it would be a good idea to quote RationalWiki to describe what his channel is like? I watch 2-3 of his segments a day, do you you really think I need to be quoted what is on his channel? That Tim Pool is alt right is itself a talking point. Do you really think a website that self defines itself as "Rational" is a good place to get unbaised information? I don't. Especially when they add unsourced rhetoric, like what you bolded, in it's facts. It defines alt right as (Xshort for naziX alternative right) is Xa patriotically correct term for neo-Nazi far-rightX movement that opposes tolerance, multiculturalism and social justice (items they file under "Cultural Marxism" and "SJW"). No wonder they don't bother to source such a claim.From RationalWiki:
Tim Pool (1986–) is a Eurasian American commentator and former Vice News reporter who describes himself as a "social liberal" and "left-libertarian" who "support(ed) Bernie Sanders".[3] Despite this, his content is composed almost exclusively of rebuttal-free alt-right talking points. Pool first gained notoriety reporting from the front lines of the Occupy Wall Street protests.
Perhaps your frame of reference is not so broad as you imagine?
Given that I stated that I frequent him a lot, why did you think it would be a good idea to quote RationalWiki to describe what his channel is like? I watch 2-3 of his segments a day, do you you really think I need to be quoted what is on his channel? That Tim Pool is alt right is itself a talking point. Do you really think a website that self defines itself as "Rational" is a good place to get unbaised information? I don't.
AbeGaustad said:[Tim Pool] describes himself as “center-left” and, usually in brief asides, notes his dislike for Donald Trump. But Pool’s insistence that he supports liberal policy doesn’t match with the rest of his content. A quick scroll through his last 100 videos shows a preoccupation with criticizing the left. For example, there are around ten videos critical of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. There are zero videos critical of Donald Trump.
Tim Pool says he is left of center. I will not entertain conspiracy theories that showed up in your recent google searches to discredit him. If you want to know what he is about I suggest going to his actual content and watching it.Abe Gaustad of medium.com makes a convincing argument on why Tim Pool is a phony liberal (can't link because of a semi-naughty, prohibited word).
So, why do you consider him to be "left of center"?
He says he's left, but do his arguments and videos support that contention? Actions, you know.Tim Pool says he is left of center. I will not entertain conspiracy theories that showed up in your recent google searches to discredit him. If you want to know what he is about I suggest going to his actual content and watching it.
And you're a Beck fan? Huh. At least my sources support their contention with actual evidence, but, hey, you got Pool's word for it, so what more do you need? Seriously, look and think about it.I will not entertain conspiracy theories...
His arguments support that he thinks for himself rather than being an opinion receptacle of a party line. That is why I watch both him and Beck. You found the sources you wanted to find because you googled Tim Pool to find bad things about him. I have no reason to believe the conspiracy claim of your "sources", and so I will continue to believe what he identifies as.He says he's left, but do his arguments and videos support that contention? Actions, you know.
And you're a Beck fan? Huh. At least my sources support their contention with actual evidence, but, hey, you got Pool's word for it, so what more do you need? Seriously, look and think about it.
Your claim is that he is "left of center" because he says he's left of center, but the articles against him dispute that with evidence, so I was just wondering if you had anything to support your contention.His arguments support that he thinks for himself rather than being an opinion receptacle of a party line.
No, that's actually not true. I googled him because I didn't know who he was and these were some of the things on the first page.You found the sources you wanted to find because you googled Tim Pool to find bad things about him.
Well, you would have to actually read the articles, especially the footnotes where they link to his own work. They cite sources, not simply opinion. I don't know that they are correct, but so far, you've done a poor job of disputing them. They give actual evidence; you give "Tim Pool said he was left of center" with zero evidence to support that what he says is to believed. So, on one hand, evidence; on the other, bald assertion - I'll go with the first hand until I have some reason not to.I have no reason to believe the conspiracy claim of your "sources", and so I will continue to believe what he identifies as.
The article goes on to give many examples and instances. Also, it helps to read the footnotes.You are mistaken. Rational wiki did not source the rhetorical claim you bolded, it sourced many things, but not that. What you bolded was an opinion.
Perhaps later.Beck did source his claims if you watched the video, or the link I gave to Tulc where it shows the documents.
If you are wondering about the Ukraine scandal and not sure who to trust, or what is going on Glenn Beck has done a deep documentary on it. He begins his documentary asking you not to trust him but to check his facts, and declares that it not partisan (Glenn is not a Trump fan). It is worthwhile to to watch, and a loss to dismiss. Check it out below when and if you have time.
Any non dismissal comments are welcome. I just wanted to share this with the community because you won't find it on Fox or CNN. skip to 10:43