• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Two doves and two pigeons of Nativity

James_Lai

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2021
1,100
265
39
Ontario
✟24,480.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I think in this case whatever scenario you're imagining is very unlikely.

-CryptoLutheran

That wasn’t the point. You justify hypotheticals until shown what it actually means in reality. It’s a tragedy of intellectuals of all times…

How many times hypotheticals became reality in human history? Enough to be worried about any hypotheticals

About us - Temple Institute
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,532
29,041
Pacific Northwest
✟812,661.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
That wasn’t the point. You justify hypotheticals until shown what it actually means in reality.

How many times hypotheticals became reality in human history? Enough to be worried about any hypotheticals

I guess I just don't see the point in thinking that somehow a group of Jews will get a third temple built in Jerusalem, re-institute the priesthood and regular sacrifices, and then convince most of the world's Jews to get on board with that is a scenario to be worried about. Most religious Jews don't even believe a temple can exist in Jerusalem again until the Messiah comes. And if the real bona fide Messiah shows up to do that, and it wasn't Jesus this whole time, then I got much bigger things to think about.

Hypotheticals are fine, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with yours. Yeah, I guess you're right, if somehow by some insane chain of circumcstances that did happen, it would probably mean the slaughter of a lot of animals.

And if the Illuminati were real and could weaponize the weather, that'd be pretty sucky too. But that's not something that worries me, because I don't believe there is some secret clandestine group controlling everything. By the same token, I really don't think we're going to have to worry about your scenario either.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

James_Lai

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2021
1,100
265
39
Ontario
✟24,480.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I guess I just don't see the point in thinking that somehow a group of Jews will get a third temple built in Jerusalem, re-institute the priesthood and regular sacrifices, and then convince most of the world's Jews to get on board with that is a scenario to be worried about. Most religious Jews don't even believe a temple can exist in Jerusalem again until the Messiah comes. And if the real bona fide Messiah shows up to do that, and it wasn't Jesus this whole time, then I got much bigger things to think about.

Hypotheticals are fine, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with yours. Yeah, I guess you're right, if somehow by some insane chain of circumcstances that did happen, it would probably mean the slaughter of a lot of animals.

And if the Illuminati were real and could weaponize the weather, that'd be pretty sucky too. But that's not something that worries me, because I don't believe there is some secret clandestine group controlling everything. By the same token, I really don't think we're going to have to worry about your scenario either.

-CryptoLutheran

I know, you don’t see my point or refuse to see it and many educated, kind and intelligent people don’t see it.

There are many bad things in the Quran. To justify them, Muslims say, but you know, comparing to the traditions that were prevalent at the time, Mohammed’s new laws were revolutionary. Girls were no longer buried alive, women gained some property rights etc. So it was a positive thing. Perhaps. It doesn’t make the wrong doctrines in the Quran any better.

You are saying, God used a prevalent tradition, limited it and made it more humane. If I understood correctly. It still is a very ugly tradition. The picture I painted was simply to show it is so, regardless of if it’s going to remain hypothetical or not.

Why not abolish it? Is God not almighty? Why follow leadership of men instead of becoming the leader? “Okay, people, I can’t change your mind about doing those nasty things, so I’ll just tell you to keep doing them…” What a weak picture of God who adapts to people instead of giving them their pure truth.

That it’s a nasty tradition is proven by the fact people dropped it after some centuries and today have to come up with reasons why it was supported by God and why we’re not doing it anymore.

How much easier is it to admit it’s wrong?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,183
7,534
North Carolina
✟344,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Absolutely. They are not equal though.
Nor were they meant to be.

Keeping in mind the Mosaic ceremonial laws were figurative, they were not the reality itself, but pointed to the reality itself, to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James_Lai
Upvote 0