Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Genesis 1:1 - Genesis 2:e is the "quick overview of the entirety of creation."
Genesis 2:4 until the end of the world is the ACTUAL story.
Genesis 1:1 - Genesis 2:3 would be like the rolling intro text screen of a Star Wars film. Genesis 2:4 onward is the actual movie. .
Is this your example of a frame story, or did you mean it to be a contradiction?Wouldn't you say, "Hang on, I thought the intro said she already had the plans!"
Now, imagine that the intro text read:
Princess Leia is hurrying home,And then the first line of the movie is:
carrying that plans to the Death Star...
Leia:
We must find the plans to the Death Star before the Empire does, or we're doomed!
Wouldn't you say, "Hang on, I thought the intro said she already had the plans!"
Are you asking me?So, what exactly is the objection to there being two different ancient accounts of creation being included in Genesis (by Moses , if you like)?
So, what exactly is the objection to there being two different ancient accounts of creation being included in Genesis (by Moses , if you like)?
So our interpretation of scripture is supposed to be determined by the doctrine we want it to reveal?It has lead to dangerously misleading doctrine - like certain races being made on the 6th day, and then the Hebrews made specially on the 8th.
Generally, the two creation story is about a two-humanity.
It has lead to dangerously misleading doctrine - like certain races being made on the 6th day, and then the Hebrews made specially on the 8th.
Who holds to that doctrine, exactly? Because I've come across a lot of weird things over the years, but that's a new one.
-CryptoLutheran
Oh my...
The "sixth day man/eighth day Ademic race" argument is extremely popular. The belief is God made all the other races, and then made the Ademic race on the 8th day to be a set apart people. Essentially, all ethnic peoples were 6th day creation, and the "Jews" were the 8th day creation.
My question is how that heterodox "8th day creation" arises from assuming two different creation accounts. Neither one describes any creation on an eighth day. One would have to make the egregious assumption that the two accounts were meant to be taken serially in order to arrive at such a foolish notion.No, it is supposed to be determined by the truth.
Adam was the first male. This is reiterated in the New Testament. There was no 6th day, and then 8th day creation.
My question is how that heterodox "8th day creation" arises from assuming two different creation accounts. Neither one describes any creation on an eighth day. One would have to make the egregious assumption that the two accounts were meant to be taken serially in order to arrive at such a foolish notion.
I know.People adopt various weird theories in order to reconcile the two accounts.
Yes!Doncha hate it when the post reply button gets hit prematurely?