Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This particular graph was fudged-the infamous hockey stick.Since you never support your claims, I will just show that you are wrong. By the way I never claimed or even implied that growth was exponential. It is clearly not logarithmic:
LOL!! No, it really isn't. And the hockey stick was not "fudged" that is a claim that you cannot support. It turns out that every accurate graph of temperature is very similar to the "hockey stick". Do you know why?This particular graph was fudged-the infamous hockey stick.
Global warming is true. The satellite graphs for temperatures produced by Roy Spencer shows that we are experiencing some warmer than normal warming of nearly three degrees above the norm which is zero balance. The current situation of nearly six degrees above normal is very interesting to the climate change theory. Weather the satellite graphs in the next few years are going to continue to be up or stay the same or level out at the same place is a pause at a higher level than it was for fifteen years of nearly three degrees or not depends on many factors that are known to be associated with warming. The MWP topped out at about the level it's at now. The satellite graphs for the modern warming up of global temperature is accurate and consistent with the geological record of all the other warmings we have on record. So what are we going to have. Are temperatures going to keep going up or are they just going to level off at the level they are now ? It's essential at this point to see if we have run away warming or if the warming will level off at a lower rate like the previous years from 2000 to 2015. Remember In 2008 and 2012 all of the warming was gone and we had normal and even cooling temperatures for those years. So it's essential to see what the satellite graphs for 2021 and beyond will show.
Ninety percent of the CO2 produced in the atmosphere is from alge and fungi decomposing carbon based life forms and releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. There is nothing we can do about it at our present level of thechnology. The five warmings including this modern warming are all measured at about the level we have now , so what will be the next number that the satellite temperature will be ?
Global warming is Optimal for plants and animals at the level of warming we have now. As long as we don't have any higher temperatures in the coming years, we can deal with that. I am going to be looking forward to hearing about the satellite measurements for the mo ths to come May and June are very interesting and key to where the level of warming up is going to be at for the future.
I am certain that the CO2 produced by nature and mankind needs to be studied concerning the mathmatics of the CO2 warming on the atmosphere.
Hockey stick has been researched & imperfect normalization was applied to the curve, a decade left out, the decline missing. Many articles even a court case. Tony Heller has done a lot of work on this. Again as I have reiterated there are too many inputs into the climate picture included solar climatology, the earth's magnetic cycle & reversals coupled with shifting tectonics. Increasing ocean water temp has been attributed some concepts that rest in marine geology, namely hydrothermal vents & the entire chain of underwater volcanism. Such warmer ocean water increases the rate of evaporation as well.LOL!! No, it really isn't. And the hockey stick was not "fudged" that is a claim that you cannot support. It turns out that every accurate graph of temperature is very similar to the "hockey stick". Do you know why?
No, that was only the claim of ignorant deniers. Please find a reliable source that can support your claim.Hockey stick has been researched & imperfect normalization was applied to the curve, a decade left out, the decline missing. Many articles even a court case. Tony Heller has done a lot of work on this. Again as I have reiterated there are too many inputs into the climate picture included solar climatology, the earth's magnetic cycle & reversals coupled with shifting tectonics. Increasing ocean water temp has been attributed some concepts that rest in marine geology, namely hydrothermal vents & the entire chain of underwater volcanism. Such warmer ocean water increases the rate of evaporation as well.
If they are scientists where are there peer reviewed papers? If one is not actively doing science one can hardly claim to be a scientist. The deniers are pretty much an anti-science bunch.Actually the deniers are not ignorant. They are scientists to. What scientists do is continue to explore, research, & measure. The hockey stick was frauded. Mann did not focus his research as much on the 1930s/40s which were considered hot decades. You are the one who needs to do more reading given that earth science is a huge subject but the stuff of climate interconnects all 4 of the sciences: astronomy, geology, meteorology, & oceanography. The Ice Ages have been correlated with certain carbon cycles & future fuels because the ice ages have been linked with magnetic reversals in addition to Milankovich cycles (Robert W. Felix Not by Fire but by Ice).
Your link only goes to a general BBC page. Can you please try to repost it.www.bbc.co.uk decomposition of carbon based life produces carbon dioxide. This process is ongoing and prolific producing most of the CO2 in the atmosphere.
Yes, but we have ways of tracing carbon dioxide. There is a reason that you cannot find sources that support your claims.This is basic biology, carbon based life forms die and decompose sending carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere.
That is still not an article. If you give me the title of the article I may be able to post it for you.news.mit.edu the quote for the figure of ninety percent of the CO2 produced by decay of plants and animals is found here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?