Hi Holden11, first of all Id like to commend you for not putting this issue on the backburner of your life, but placing it as a priority in your life, and also for seeking and demanding the truth, not just believing because other people believe. In your post, you indicated that there are three areas that you need information about: Is the Bible real (historically accurate)? Is God real? Is Jesus who the Bible says he is? These are three excellent questions, and although I cannot even begin to answer any of these questions in entirety, but I will share the facts that have made the greatest impression on my mind.
Is the Bible real (historically accurate)?
First lets talk about the New Testament. The gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were written in about 60 A.D., give or take a couple years. Jesus was put to death between 30 and 33 A.D. That leaves only 30 years between when the events happened and when the gospels were written. Historically speaking, this is a news flash, and there is no possible way for legends, myths, or inaccurate details to become incorporated into the gospels. Let me tell you why. First, most of the people who were around during Jesus ministry and death were still around 30 years later, when the gospels were written and the disciples began preaching them. So if there were any false details, people would have said Hey that didnt happen or He didnt say that or something of the sort. Secondly, Paul and the other disciples gave their lives for their beliefs! They knew what they witnessed and knew that it was the truth. If they had been making the whole thing up, or exaggerating the truth about Jesus rising from the dead or something, they would never have died for their beliefs! Third the New Testament has not only survived in more manuscripts than any other book of antiquity, but it has survived in a purer form than any other great book a form that is 99.5 percent pure (The Case for Christ, 65). For further information on this, I highly recommend The Case for Christ, by Lee Strobel. It also talks about how there were many instances during Jesus ministry where there were crowds of people as witnesses, and also how other secular historians from the first century also recorded some of the events that are found in the New Testament.
Next lets look at the Old Testament. A surprising piece of evidence is the fact the no discovery has ever disproved a biblical reference. Now I know youre thinking what about evolution and things like that, but thats a whole different story considering that evolution is just a theory, and also that it is possible to both believe in the Bible and in evolution; its just a matter of interpretation. But what Im really getting at are things like how the Bible talks about the Hittite people, and until about 20 years ago there was no evidence of these people, but since then archaeologists found the Hittite civilization. Also the Bible says that the walls of Jericho fell out, when walls in the Old Testament times normally fell inwards. However when an archaeological dig was conducted in the city of Jericho, they found that the walls fell out. Also, the genealogical records that the Bible provides are historically accurate. Also, biblical events such as the Flood, have been corroborated by finds such as : marine fossils atop every mountain range in the world, including giant (650 pound) oysters at the top of the AndesMountains; also other cultures ancient stories and traditions talk about a great flood. To learn more, visit h t t p : / / w w w . christian - - science . c o m / (except take out all of the spaces I put in; apparently Im not allowed to post a link until I have 15 posts or something). By the way, I dont personally agree with the segments on the link about dinosaurs and evolution, but I think the other articles are very good.
Is God real?
Im assuming you want hard facts about this subject, and not spiritual answers, because although those are very powerful, you personally cannot evaluate their truth, but have to rely on someone elses judgment. So Ill give you the best physical arguments I have for this case. First where did the earth come from? Lets say humans evolved from primates, which evolved from reptiles, which evolved from marine life, which evolved from multi-cellular organisms, which evolved from single-celled organisms, which evolved from amoebas, which evolved from protein chains, which evolved from the abundance of elements produced by the big bang, which came from
oh crud where does that come from?. Now matter how you retrace history, eventually you get to a point where everything came from nothing. Now this doesnt really jive with the first law of thermodynamics which says that energy and mass are always conserved in given system, in other words, energy and mass cannot spontaneously appear or disappear, only converted to one form or another. I would take this one step further to say that energy and mass cannot create or destroy themselves. Based on this fundamental principle of physics, how could all of the energy and mass in the universe spontaneously create itself? It is impossible. Even the most renowned physicist of our age, Stephen Hawking, said that the fact that the universe had a beginning implies a Creator. Now on to less scientifically-oriented proof
.youve probably already heard the intelligent design argument, but in case you havent Ill tell it to you. It asks: if you were walking in a forest and found a watch on the ground, wouldnt you assume that the watch was made by someone, and didnt just naturally coalesce? Why, then, would you look at the tree next to the watch and assume the exact opposite? The intelligent design of a watch implies a watchmaker, so likewise, the intelligent design of creation implies a creator. Just look how intricate everything in nature is. From the leaf of a tree to a human brain, everything in nature is of intelligent design and implies an intelligent creator. Besides these intellectually logical proofs of Gods existence, there are thousands of spiritual proofs of Gods existence. I cannot tell you how many prayers of mine have been answered, down to the very last details. But no matter how many scientific proofs you hear or how many miracles you witness, there is a moment in you where you just know, not in your mind, but in your spirit, in your whole being, that there is a God. Its not a moment where fireworks go off or where a booming voice talks to you, but just a period of understanding that happens once you trust in God. At least that is what it has been for me. Oh yeah, on to the third question.
Is Jesus who the Bible says he is?
This question relies heavily on the accuracy and validity of the New Testament itself. I already talked about this in the response to the first question. Let me just add some arguments for the truth of his crucifixion and resurrection, because frankly, no matter how perfect Jesus was during his life, if he didnt raise from dead to conquer death, there would be no point in believing in him. First we need to make sure he died, and then we need to make sure he rose from the dead. One theory is that Jesus never really died on the cross, but merely fainted, and then later regained consciousness. This really can hardly be called a theory because it completely lacks credibility. Before he even got to the cross, Jesus was tortured by flogging, which would have caused him to lose such large amounts of blood that many people would have died just from this. Then when he got to the cross he would have died from asphyxiation (cannot breathe) since the hanging position on the cross inhibits exhaling. Furthermore, a Roman soldier stabbed a spear into his right side to see if blood and water came out, which was the sign of death, and it did. There is no way someone could survive all of these things. Jesus was definitely dead when he was buried in the tomb, and if he wasnt, how could he recover enough to push away the boulder in front of the tomb that would take several men to push away? It is simply impossible by human standards. Yet three days later Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene (John 20:10-18), other women (Matthew 28:8-10), Cleopas and another disciple (Luke 24:13-32), eleven disciples and others (Luke 24:33-49), to ten apostles and others (John 20:19-23), to Thomas and the other apostles (John 20:26-30), to seven apostles (John 21:1-13), to the disciples (Matthew 28:16-20), and to 500 people (1 Corinthians 15). Now you might say well how do I know these people really saw him? and the answer is you dont. But you have to consider that most of the disciples spent the rest of their lives proclaiming that Jesus died on the cross, and rose from the dead. In return for this they were ridiculed, beaten, imprisoned, and most were executed. Why would they die for this if they knew it wasnt true? If they knew deep down that they never saw Jesus resurrected, they would never give their lives up for a lie. That is, for me, the most significant evidence.
Well I hope I have presented some reasonable arguments for you to ponder over. I really recommend reading The Case for Christ, because it goes through every possible theory or flaw in Jesus story and you will be surprised by how solid the case really is. If you have any questions for me, feel free to ask. Keep seeking the truth.