Hi all!
I am new to this board and a relatively new Christian (3 1/2 years). I have a question about belief that bugs me. It may take a few rounds before I can articulate what really is the essence but it is something like this:
Where does belief start? When is one "in-the faith" and out of it? I think it's accurate to say that I only believe what I understand. Am I truly a believer, if I don't grasp all of Christian theology? If I grasp very little of it? If I don't agree with it? What is the essence of salvation?
These questions are all hitting around the issue of what I think that we all *truly* believe. I think all Christians believe in a Jesus of the heart, rather than a Jesus of Theology. There is so much to the Incarnation, the Trinity, exclusivity claims, and certain and absolute knowledge that I cannot grasp, and if pressed, I have to say, "I really don't know, if you (or the Bible) say so." In all honesty, I am not sure what I believe, or what belief really is. I am committed to the Christian way, I *think* it is correct. I have to be honest and admit that the evidentiary claims are only probabalistic. I don't truly *know*, I believe. This is what our great creeds say, "We *believe*... I am 2000 years or more removed from our Bible, and the most I can say is that this is the best explanation that I can find, and I'll go with it. I can tell another faith claimant that I don't believe he is correct. When pressed for an explanation, ultimately it comes down to "cause I believe you are incorrect and I believe am right." I am fine with this if that is what it must be. (Actually it is less than satisfying, but if this is as good as it gets, so be it.)
Some apologetes try to point out inconsistencies with other theologies, but the problems with our own are overlooked. My point comes close to something like universalism. If the essence of Christianity, that which I think we all truly believe---the Jesus of the Heart, the abstract conception of Love triumphing, our Savior, and so forth--- is the same as what the "innocent" true believer in other faiths and there essence holds onto, I do not *honestly* believe he/she is condemned. Rather, I think that our institutional theology has gone awry, as all man-made systems do. Do I deny what I really think, or allow myself to be brainwashed into thinking what others say to believe?
We can claim exclusivity, but in truth we are no better persons from the rest of the world. We still are immoral, adulterous, lying, cheating, etc. We are no different. We are different in word only. In actuality what truly distinguishes us, aside from any non-falsifiable dogmatic statements?
There is much here, I understand, but hopefully somebody can show me the essence of what we Christians truly believe. I have to admit that I don't know if I am a *true* believer. I admit that more than any evidences, the reason I hold onto Christ is because he provides me with a foundation for life. He makes sense of existence. He makes Love real. Nihilism does seem as the only other option, and I don't think that this is a false dilemma. I hold on to Christ out of pragmatics, I fear rather than any true faith. Is Christianity supposed to be like this?
I am new to this board and a relatively new Christian (3 1/2 years). I have a question about belief that bugs me. It may take a few rounds before I can articulate what really is the essence but it is something like this:
Where does belief start? When is one "in-the faith" and out of it? I think it's accurate to say that I only believe what I understand. Am I truly a believer, if I don't grasp all of Christian theology? If I grasp very little of it? If I don't agree with it? What is the essence of salvation?
These questions are all hitting around the issue of what I think that we all *truly* believe. I think all Christians believe in a Jesus of the heart, rather than a Jesus of Theology. There is so much to the Incarnation, the Trinity, exclusivity claims, and certain and absolute knowledge that I cannot grasp, and if pressed, I have to say, "I really don't know, if you (or the Bible) say so." In all honesty, I am not sure what I believe, or what belief really is. I am committed to the Christian way, I *think* it is correct. I have to be honest and admit that the evidentiary claims are only probabalistic. I don't truly *know*, I believe. This is what our great creeds say, "We *believe*... I am 2000 years or more removed from our Bible, and the most I can say is that this is the best explanation that I can find, and I'll go with it. I can tell another faith claimant that I don't believe he is correct. When pressed for an explanation, ultimately it comes down to "cause I believe you are incorrect and I believe am right." I am fine with this if that is what it must be. (Actually it is less than satisfying, but if this is as good as it gets, so be it.)
Some apologetes try to point out inconsistencies with other theologies, but the problems with our own are overlooked. My point comes close to something like universalism. If the essence of Christianity, that which I think we all truly believe---the Jesus of the Heart, the abstract conception of Love triumphing, our Savior, and so forth--- is the same as what the "innocent" true believer in other faiths and there essence holds onto, I do not *honestly* believe he/she is condemned. Rather, I think that our institutional theology has gone awry, as all man-made systems do. Do I deny what I really think, or allow myself to be brainwashed into thinking what others say to believe?
We can claim exclusivity, but in truth we are no better persons from the rest of the world. We still are immoral, adulterous, lying, cheating, etc. We are no different. We are different in word only. In actuality what truly distinguishes us, aside from any non-falsifiable dogmatic statements?
There is much here, I understand, but hopefully somebody can show me the essence of what we Christians truly believe. I have to admit that I don't know if I am a *true* believer. I admit that more than any evidences, the reason I hold onto Christ is because he provides me with a foundation for life. He makes sense of existence. He makes Love real. Nihilism does seem as the only other option, and I don't think that this is a false dilemma. I hold on to Christ out of pragmatics, I fear rather than any true faith. Is Christianity supposed to be like this?