• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Truth and Science

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think I was ever technically "born again".
You claim you were --- are you backtracking now?
I thought I might have been once back in Jr. High...
Sounds to me like someone is burning his bridges behind him.

I thought you said you were a Christian at one time?

QV: 30 and especially this 27 , where you said:
But further, personally I am offended, because I bothered to learn the bible and bothered to learn Christianity (I used to be one) before critiquing christianity, but you toss off one-liners like that that indicate that you don't need to show similar respect to my field yet you can tell us all how to do geology!
Now, what am I supposed to believe?
Yes. Yes I do. I have jumped through hoops all my life. Everything we have here we wrest from the hard earth. I would think "jumping through a hoop" for an infinite, all-powerful being would be no big thing.
I have a feeling that if the Cross wasn't a big enough hoop for you, nothing is.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,916
17,822
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟475,754.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
why wait? he could do it in a jiffy. remake the world, be done with it all.
and why HAS he not done that already?

Why make the world at all ?
Give that God already knows who will be saved, who won't be save, just put all the saved souls in heaven, unsaved in Hell & give them all the memories required.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why make the world at all ?
Give that God already knows who will be saved, who won't be save, just put all the saved souls in heaven, unsaved in Hell & give them all the memories required.
Making a case for Last Thursdayism, are we? Maybe a case for Omphalism?

Don't you guys call that, "deception"?

Always trying to put God in a catch-22, aren't you?

Well, He's smarter than all of us combined --- :)
 
Upvote 0

Amoeba

Stock Analyst
Jul 18, 2009
49
2
Visit site
✟22,679.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Making a case for Last Thursdayism, are we? Maybe a case for Omphalism?

Don't you guys call that, "deception"?

Always trying to put God in a catch-22, aren't you?

Well, He's smarter than all of us combined --- :)

And you sir are always telling God how to create.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Always trying to put God in a catch-22, aren't you?

Well, He's smarter than all of us combined --- :)

Sorry but it is not God that winds up in a "Catch-22"... it is you. And you really don't need any of our help, since you put yourself into Catch-22's all the time. You call it a "paradox" as if that was something holy.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why make the world at all ?
Give that God already knows who will be saved, who won't be save, just put all the saved souls in heaven, unsaved in Hell & give them all the memories required.
Making a case for Last Thursdayism, are we? Maybe a case for Omphalism?

Don't you guys call that, "deception"?

Always trying to put God in a catch-22, aren't you?

Well, He's smarter than all of us combined --- :)
Sorry but it is not God that winds up in a "Catch-22"... it is you. And you really don't need any of our help, since you put yourself into Catch-22's all the time. You call it a "paradox" as if that was something holy.
Not hardly.

Agreeing with PGP would be tantamount to saying God created us Last Thursday, or even Omphalos.

If one second you don't exist, and the next you do exist in either Heaven or Hell, that would be Omphalos.

I don't know how many catch-22s I've exposed here over the years.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,916
17,822
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟475,754.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Not hardly.

Agreeing with PGP would be tantamount to saying God created us Last Thursday, or even Omphalos.

If one second you don't exist, and the next you do exist in either Heaven or Hell, that would be Omphalos.

I don't know how many catch-22s I've exposed here over the years.

I guess their are some things that God just can't manage then.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Not hardly.

Agreeing with PGP would be tantamount to saying God created us Last Thursday, or even Omphalos.

If one second you don't exist, and the next you do exist in either Heaven or Hell, that would be Omphalos.

I don't know how many catch-22s I've exposed here over the years.

Not to mention created.
 
Upvote 0

sk8Joyful

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2005
15,561
2,790
✟28,800.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
How much Truth are we expected to surrender, before we can adequately embrace science?
Hi Phil,

You're not assuming, that "Truth" & "science" are mutually
exclusive :confused: - since God created ALL originally..., science is therefore included, right ;)
as we make scientific-discoveries,
as our awareness :) grows, as our learning :thumbsup: progresses, we embrace God's Truth even more... & All for the PRAISE :clap: of God!
.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sk8Joyful

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2005
15,561
2,790
✟28,800.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
why wait?
he could do it in a jiffy. remake the world, be done with it all.
and why HAS he not done that already?
God exists, creates, & rules, outside humanity's Time/Space periphery.

You don't expect, God to aquiesce to your Timeline... really.
In fact, He has giving you, by virtue of you participating here,
numerous opportunities... God's eventual earth Re-creation.../make ENJOY! :clap:
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
How much Truth are we expected to surrender before we can adequately embrace science?

None. Remember, science studies God's second book: Creation. God left in Creation evidence of how He created. That's what science figures out.

Unfortunately, some people have tried to make a scientific theory about how God created from their interpretation of Genesis. But God's Creation shows that this interpretation is wrong. It's not about "Truth" with a capital "T". It's about a mistaken human interpretation and human pride versus what God is really telling us.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟343,148.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
How much truth are we expected to surrender before we can adequately embrace christianity?

None. I personally do not find it necessary to "surrender" anything remotely resembling "truth" to embrace Christianity. Most Catholics embrace the theory of evolution as I do whereas many Protestants do not. There seems to be a subjective element to one's belief systems that can vary from individual to individual and I choose to align my beliefs with science, whenever and wherever possible. "Science" isn't always "better than" religion by the way, nor is it immune from a 'herd mentality' that can require a surrendering of 'truth' in order to "conform", just like religion.
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
How much truth are we expected to surrender before we can adequately embrace christianity?

None. There is nothing in science to contradict the essential claims of Christianity. Fundamentalism is not Christianity.

Michael, most Protestants accept evolution. And there are some Catholics who reject it: Michael Behe comes immediately to mind. I suggest that, instead of looking at "Protestant" and "Catholic", we look at Christians and Fundamentalists.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Did Jesus walk on water?

If your answer is anything other than, 'yes' --- your whole post means nothing to me; and Aquinas & co. make take a hike.
HAHA
Yep... this is the AV I remember.

Asks questions for no reason since he already knows the "Truth."

I remember I had him in this exact same place a few months ago when after some back-and-forth, he finally just said "If you're trying to make me deny the Bible, know now that I never will regardless of what you say" or something to that effect. I still find it fascinating, out of morbid curiosity, that he not only sees nothing wrong with his fear and/or blind faith in the Bible but that he actually believes himself better for it.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
None. Remember, science studies God's second book: Creation. God left in Creation evidence of how He created. That's what science figures out.

Unfortunately, some people have tried to make a scientific theory about how God created from their interpretation of Genesis. But God's Creation shows that this interpretation is wrong. It's not about "Truth" with a capital "T". It's about a mistaken human interpretation and human pride versus what God is really telling us.

I've noticed that many Creationists, whether they're willing to admit it or not, use "Truth" as a substitute for "pride."
 
Upvote 0