Trump preferred over Lincoln by Republicans

Status
Not open for further replies.

usexpat97

kewlness
Aug 1, 2012
3,308
1,618
Ecuador
✟76,839.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
They shouldn't have forced the issue at gunpoint then. The slave states attacked the US. The slave states started killing because they didn't like how an election turned out.

The killing started in Manassas, VIRGINIA. Fort Sumter is in SOUTH CAROLINA. In both cases, those were Union troops, invading slave states. There were no casualties at Fort Sumter, even though the Confederates very much could have. And hindsight 20/20, should have. You need to re-check your history books.

The slave states rebelled without letting over third of their people even have a vote in the matter.

Again, I was very clear that I only sympathized with the South on the matter of separation from the Union, if that's what they want. Not slavery.

Maybe in matters of peaceful separation with an agreement from both sides over who get what matters can be different, but the United States had every right to preserve its territorial integrity from a radical insurgency.

Which is EXACTLY what Yes! California is.

And I am a Californian. We don't want to leave the Union. So please keep us out this, thank you very much.

Fact-check.

The 'Calexit' plan to split California from the US gets a second chance, while others are looking to break up the state
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Huh? Yes it is.
If it never comes to a vote, we can't very well say they're 'disgusted to the point of leaving.'

It's all just talk in the meantime (and we both know Californians wouldn't secede if given the chance).
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
The killing started in Manassas, VIRGINIA. Fort Sumter is in SOUTH CAROLINA. In both cases, those were Union troops, invading slave states. There were no casualties at Fort Sumter, even though the Confederates very much could have. And hindsight 20/20, should have. You need to re-check your history books.
Maybe you should. The proximate cause of hostilities was the disposition of federally owned property in the seceding states. The Confederates attacked Fort Sumter, a federally owned island in Charleston harbor on April 12th 1861 which is what began the shooting war, That can hardly be construed as "Union troops invading slave states." First Manassas did not take place until two months later, on April 21st.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The Confederates attacked Fort Sumter, a federally owned island in Charleston harbor on April 12th 1861 which is what began the shooting war, That can hardly be construed as "Union troops invading slave states." First Manassas did not take place until two months later, on April 21st.
However, what is alleged to be the first actual fighting (however small), did occur in Manassas before Ft. Sumter and before Bull Run. It's one of those trivia things that hardly anyone who hasn't been on the spot ever heard of. :)
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
However, what is alleged to be the first actual fighting (however small), did occur in Manassas before Ft. Sumter and before Bull Run. It's one of those trivia things that hardly anyone who hasn't been on the spot ever heard of. :)
Then there is the firing on The Star of the West, which was attempting to resupply Fort Sumter, on January 9th 1861.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Then there is the firing on The Star of the West, which was attempting to resupply Fort Sumter, on January 9th 1861.
I was saying that our friend's comment here about Manassas could be correct, although you challenged it.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I was saying that our friend's comment here about Manassas could be correct, although you challenged it.
I was responding to his assertion that the attack on Ft. Sumter amounted to "Union troops invading slave states."
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I was responding to his assertion that the attack on Ft. Sumter amounted to "Union troops invading slave states."
My comment was about him saying that the killing started in Manassas and you replying that--
First Manassas did not take place until two months later, on April 21st.

In fact, he may be right about this, even though we all agree that the battle called First Manassas came later.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,330
24,253
Baltimore
✟559,056.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The killing started in Manassas, VIRGINIA. Fort Sumter is in SOUTH CAROLINA. In both cases, those were Union troops, invading slave states. There were no casualties at Fort Sumter, even though the Confederates very much could have. And hindsight 20/20, should have. You need to re-check your history books.

giphy.gif
 
Upvote 0

A Realist

Living in Reality
Dec 27, 2018
1,371
1,335
Georgia
✟67,536.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There were no casualties at Fort Sumter, even though the Confederates very much could have.
Maybe because they surrendered before they suffered any casualties?

Number of Union soldiers at Fort Sumter: 80
Number of Confederacy soldiers manning the artillery: 500

It was pure chance that no one at the fort was killed. The commander only fired guns from the lower casemates at the fort where his men would be better protected from the shelling. The Confederates weren't trying to "not" kill them......
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

usexpat97

kewlness
Aug 1, 2012
3,308
1,618
Ecuador
✟76,839.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Maybe because they surrendered before they suffered any casualties?

Number of Union soldiers at Fort Sumter: 80
Number of Confederacy soldiers manning the artillery: 500

It was pure chance that no one at the fort was killed. The commander only fired guns from the lower casemates at the fort where his men would be better protected from the shelling. The Confederates weren't trying to "not" kill them......

Oh come on.

The South could very easily have waited for the troop transports to sail in and sink them. It was a last attempt to secede peacefully.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Oh come on.

The South could very easily have waited for the troop transports to sail in and sink them. It was a last attempt to secede peacefully.
That's all very well, but I still don't see how firing on Ft. Sumter amounted to "Union forces invading slave states."
 
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Exactly. Many of today's Southern Republicans espouse the same ideals as the Southern Democrats of the Civil War era.

The Trump supporters in today's south are the folks running around with the rebel flags on their cars, flying on flag poles in front of their houses, and sporting MAGA hats. They just can't get it through their heads that the South lost.
A misunderstanding happened. Lee gave his sword to Grant so he could shine it. Grant was so drunk he thought Lee surrendered.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.