And you don't? It seems that some Christians, particularly evangelicals, look towards Revelation and what they consider to be Biblical prophecy and base their opinion of "right and wrong" in the Israeli-Hamas battle based on that.
I look at Israel and Hamas and think: 1) Israel was given a certain amount of land in 1948 after WWII. This was right and appropriate, and I would have hoped that they would have lived in peace with the Palestinians already residing there. 2) In 1967, they had a six-day war and more than doubled their land mass, displacing the people who had lived there for centuries. On the one hand, Israeli supporters say tha t Israelis lived there from 4000 B.C. so they have prior claim, but they also moved throughout the world in later years and while they abandoned it another group of people set up permanent homes there. 3) Palestinians fought back, many believe with good reason, and Israel, with more money, technology, and western support, managed to push them into small blocks of land where they were unable to leave without going through 2 hour long checkpoint lines, restricted from visiting par windows of the residents and subjected them to earsplitting noise. Decades of systematic torture and oppression--and you are blaming the Palestinians for seeking an end to this oppression and looking to Hamas (in one, and only one, election, in 2006)?
My opinion is colored by the stories of a much younger friend who had gone there after Catholic college to work for equal rights for the Palestinians. Like the white college students who stood on the Edmund Pettis bridge with blacks and were beaten, tortured, and even killed, my young friend was arrested, beaten, and eventually brought to the border of Egypt and tol d he could never return.
There is wrong on both sides--fighting on both sides. Just like the Native Americans and the "new" Americans. And as usual, the well-funded, well-fed, well-paid, well-educated Israelis oppressed the Palestinians.