Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden agencies from communicating with social media platforms

[HARK!]

A federal judge has blocked key agencies within President Joe Biden’s administration from communicating with social media companies about certain online speech in an extraordinary ruling as part of an ongoing case that could have profound impacts on the First Amendment.

The preliminary injunction granted by Donald Trump-appointed US District Judge Terry A Doughty in Louisiana on 4 July prohibits the FBI and the US Department of Health and Human Services, among others, from speaking with platforms for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden agencies from communicating with social media platforms

A federal judge’s preliminary injunction could impact government efforts to combat online disinformation

www.aol.com

 

[Wings like Eagles]

Wow - that is good news for sure.

 

[Hans Blaster]

So why is a case lead by the State of Missouri occurring in the Monroe division of the Western District of Louisiana? Why not the federal courthouse nearest the Missouri state capital?

Oh, wait, I know. There is only one federal judge in Monroe. They were judge shopping.

 

[HARK!]

So why is a case lead by the State of Missouri occurring in the Monroe division of the Western District of Louisiana? Why not the federal courthouse nearest the Missouri state capital?

Oh, wait, I know. There is only one federal judge in Monroe. They were judge shopping.

Surely you aren't suggesting that we have to shop around to find a judge who will protect free speech?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Surely you aren't suggesting that we have to shop around to find a judge who will protect free speech?

No, I am suggesting this is probably a garbage suit that needs help. The non-state plaintiffs are a collection of heath misinformation propagators and propagandists and the publisher of a fake news/conspiracy site. Assuming the non-state plaintiffs had a valid case (let's just assume that for the moment), this looks more like a private action by a bunch of twit(er user)s who got blocked, suspended, etc., upon (based on their apparent claims against government actors) the recommendation of government agencies or actors (the defendants). (I note the lack of social media companies among the defendants.)

If their home states have an interest in protecting their citizens from federal intrusion in their free speech rights, then an amicus brief to the court in support of the suit might be appropriate. Alternatively a suit from the state might be appropriate if they can demonstrate a broad pattern of behavior of government demanded censorship of their citizens.

This doesn't look like any of those. It's forum shopping.

 

[Pommer]

A federal judge has blocked key agencies within President Joe Biden’s administration from communicating with social media companies about certain online speech in an extraordinary ruling as part of an ongoing case that could have profound impacts on the First Amendment.

The preliminary injunction granted by Donald Trump-appointed US District Judge Terry A Doughty in Louisiana on 4 July prohibits the FBI and the US Department of Health and Human Services, among others, from speaking with platforms for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden agencies from communicating with social media platforms

A federal judge’s preliminary injunction could impact government efforts to combat online disinformation

www.aol.com

I’m not quite sure what the emojis are. It looks like “celebration”.
A Judge has (potentially) infringed on the Free Speech of the President.
“You cannot have people whose job is to fraternize with ‘the Press’ .”
That’s like half of the jobs!

I see a writ of mandamus a-comin’

 

[HARK!]

I’m not quite sure what the emojis are. It looks like “celebration”.
A Judge has (potentially) infringed on the Free Speech of the President.
“You cannot have people whose job is to fraternize with ‘the Press’ .”
That’s like half of the jobs!

LOL!

Infringing on the free speech of the President, as his Administration infringes on the free speech of the People he supposedly serves?

Yes, I'm celebrating a victory against the assault on our Constitution.

 

[stevil]

I’m not quite sure what the emojis are. It looks like “celebration”.
A Judge has (potentially) infringed on the Free Speech of the President.
“You cannot have people whose job is to fraternize with ‘the Press’ .”
That’s like half of the jobs!

I see a writ of mandamus a-comin’

Yeah it seems like a poor judgement, and will most likely be overturned.

 

[HARK!]

Yeah it seems like a poor judgement, and will most likely be overturned.

Well since Trump won't be censored during this campaign, nor those like the New York Post, who expose the trumped up lies waged against him; maybe some heads will roll when he takes office.

Why do some on the Left have such contempt for the 1st Amendment?

 

[stevil]

Well since Trump won't be censored during this campaign, nor those like the New York Post, who expose the trumped up lies waged against him; maybe some heads will roll when he takes office.

Why do some on the Left have such contempt for the 1st Amendment?

I would consider myself on the right.
It's very doubful D Trump could win the USA presidential election again. But hey, stranger things have happened.

 

[HARK!]

I would consider myself on the right.
It's very doubful D Trump could win the USA presidential election again. But hey, stranger things have happened.

He's winning as we speak.

Donald Trump Holds Big Lead Over Joe Biden in Swing States, Polls Show

 

[stevil]

He's winning as we speak.

Donald Trump Holds Big Lead Over Joe Biden in Swing States, Polls Show

Has the election started?

Define winning?

 

[DaisyDay]

Disinformation is a protected right!

Why do some on the Left have such contempt for the 1st Amendment?

Why do some on the Right spread lies about the Left?

 

[HARK!]

Why do some on the Right spread lies about the Left?

The NY Post was telling the truth.

One of the FBI agents who briefed Facebook before the social network restricted The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 declared in a meeting with Twitter and Homeland Security officials earlier this year that media needs to be “held accountable” for spreading so-called “disinformation” according to a report.

FBI official tied to Hunter Biden censorship warned media must be ‘held accountable’

One of the FBI agents who met with Facebook before the social media giant censored The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 declared in a March meeting with Twitter an…

nypost.com

The FBI warned Twitter during “weekly” meetings before the 2020 election to expect “hack-and-leak operations’’ by “state actors” involving Hunter Biden, and “likely” in October, according to a sworn declaration by Twitter’s former head of site integrity, Yoel Roth.


The warnings were so specific that Twitter immediately censored The Post’s scoop about Hunter Biden’s laptop on Oct. 14, 2020, citing its “hacked materials” policy, a move described on Saturday as “election interference” by Twitter’s new owner, Elon Musk.

FBI warned Twitter during ‘weekly’ meetings of Hunter Biden ‘hack-and-leak operation’ before censoring The Post

The FBI warned Twitter during “weekly” meetings before the 2020 election to expect “hack-and-leak operations’’ by “state actors” involving Hunter Biden, and “likely” in October.

nypost.com

 

[Pommer]

The NY Post was telling the truth.

One of the FBI agents who briefed Facebook before the social network restricted The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 declared in a meeting with Twitter and Homeland Security officials earlier this year that media needs to be “held accountable” for spreading so-called “disinformation” according to a report.

FBI official tied to Hunter Biden censorship warned media must be ‘held accountable’

One of the FBI agents who met with Facebook before the social media giant censored The Post’s expose on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 declared in a March meeting with Twitter an…

nypost.com

The FBI warned Twitter during “weekly” meetings before the 2020 election to expect “hack-and-leak operations’’ by “state actors” involving Hunter Biden, and “likely” in October, according to a sworn declaration by Twitter’s former head of site integrity, Yoel Roth.


The warnings were so specific that Twitter immediately censored The Post’s scoop about Hunter Biden’s laptop on Oct. 14, 2020, citing its “hacked materials” policy, a move described on Saturday as “election interference” by Twitter’s new owner, Elon Musk.

FBI warned Twitter during ‘weekly’ meetings of Hunter Biden ‘hack-and-leak operation’ before censoring The Post

The FBI warned Twitter during “weekly” meetings before the 2020 election to expect “hack-and-leak operations’’ by “state actors” involving Hunter Biden, and “likely” in October.

nypost.com

So what?

 

[HARK!]

So what?

That's the point.

 

[Pommer]

That's the point.

Are you suggesting that the Trump Administration lost control of the FBI after Donald Trump went out of his way to fire Comey to get someone he himself appointed?

 

[HARK!]

Are you suggesting that the Trump Administration lost control of the FBI after Donald Trump went out of his way to fire Comey to get someone he himself appointed?

What do you mean by lost control? Trump was in the process of draining the swamp.

Are you suggesting that it's OK for the FBI to censor the Press, and spread disinformation?

 

[Pommer]

What do you mean by lost control? Trump was in the process of draining the swamp.

Are you suggesting that it's OK for the FBI to censor the Press, and spread disinformation?

Where did you show that the FBI forbad news media to cover a story?

 

[NxNW]

Surely you aren't suggesting that we have to shop around to find a judge who will protect free speech?

I'm suggesting that the Biden administration never threatened it in the first place. Though I recall Trump making many attempts to suppress it.