- Oct 23, 2003
- 16,711
- 1,132
- 52
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
....they aren't the only ones, ever hear of Google? I'm not going to post articles from everyone who says it.
The reason I chose CNN is because the blatantly biased right wing media refers to CNN as part of the "liberal media". Since it was liberals who made the claim (Obama Administration), I figured you would find it more credible if the "Obama loving liberal media" were the ones printing articles contrary to what information the Obama administration put out.
Of course, I understand that's a hard thing for some people to wrap their minds around. Why would the "Obama loving liberal media" put out information that seems to contradict what the Obama admin. is putting out? That's not very helpful is it? It's almost as if (though of course this would NEVER happen in reality) those folks at CNN are actually reporting information they find without trying to benefit a certain party or administration. It's almost like they're just concerned with reporting facts regardless of who they help or hurt. Crazy right? Actual journalism?
I don't buy it either, its all part of that grand liberal conspiracy to monopolize facts and reason. It's not just the journalists either, its anyone who deals in "facts" and "reality" like scientists and teachers. Anyone who really wants the truth should only listen to FOX news, priests, and Sarah Palin.
Just so I understand your point, we'll trust CNN because they're going against what the WH said.
WH: Wasn't a planned attack despite a few accounts to the contrary
CNN: Wasn't a planned attack.
Yup, your argument makes perfect sense, and I don't even need fox news to show that to me. And of course CNN reports facts, like when they interviewed the creator of "the Obama that I use to know"; pure facts.
Did you actually read the cnn article? "That point was stressed as well by White House spokesman Jay Carney on Wednesday." Yup, contradictory as well.
Upvote
0