- May 28, 2015
- 15,873
- 7,590
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
See #60......No, the numbers are not there. The numbers are complete fabrications and no more credible then you claims of being able to predict the future.
I'm sorry, have you heard me excuse GW Bush for anything cuz if you have please post it here. Barack doubled the national debt in 8 years.....it took him 8 years to double what before him had taken 220 years to accumulate. So please try dealing with as much as 100 trillion dollars in additional spending over 10 years based on democratic WH contenders 'wishlists' and quit harping about the past....The last 20 years has had a Republican at the helm for 11 of them…
No. There have been several Democratic presidents. None has had open borders. More fear-mongering.
Can anyone say why my tax dollars should be spent on 15th century technology (walls) that border crossers can compromise in a matter of hours?
Would it not be more rational to examine the root causes of illegal immigration and address those?
I'm sorry, have you heard me excuse GW Bush for anything cuz if you have please post it here. Barack doubled the national debt in 8 years.....it took him 8 years to double what before him had taken 220 years to accumulate. So please try dealing with as much as 100 trillion dollars in additional spending over 10 years based on democratic WH contenders 'wishlists' and quit harping about the past....
Do you have any idea where that additional 10 trillion dollars a year in is going to come from to pay for all that 'free stuff' they keep promising? Cuz if you do you might want to convey that info to them because they are clueless....and just hoping nobody is smart enough to notice.
You must be seeing things belk, there were no numbers in that post....You mean the post where you completely ignored @KCfromNC refutation of your numbers in #51 and told him to prove it as if it did not exist?
Hey, YOU are the one that disagreed with what I posted; it is up to YOU to show that these numbers are incorrect
Sorta like HRC ...
I see deflection....
deflection only carries one so far......
Well, please show the numbers and not just your opinion. Shouldn't be too hard to find....if you are correct.Yes, for example when I mentioned that the article you posted double-counted health care costs and didn't realize that shifting the cost from one place to the other wasn't a new cost.
Just so people can see you did not grasp the message:I appreciate the irony here.
Sorta like HRC not having time to visit Wisconson....how did that work out for her? They need to address otherwise the R's will have a field day putting out numbers with no push back....bad news for the D's.
Still no numbers, huh?.....deflection only carries one so far......
Now you are just taunting. It is well known, has been thoroughly discussed in this forum--including with you--that the cost proposed for single-payer healthcare is not additional to what we are paying for health care now. If you want to deny that then the burden of proof is on you.Well, please show the numbers and not just your opinion. Shouldn't be too hard to find....if you are correct.
Then if it has been 'thoroughly discussed' the numbers supporting the claim should be very easy to find......Now you are just taunting. It is well known, has been thoroughly discussed in this forum--including with you--that the cost proposed for single-payer healthcare is not additional to what we are paying for health care now. If you want to deny that then the burden of proof is on you.
Then you shouldn't have any trouble finding them. It is not the least bit controversial that the cost of single-payer will be about the same as what we are paying now and instead of what we are paying now.Then if it has been 'thoroughly discussed' the numbers supporting the claim should be very easy to find......
You must be seeing things belk, there were no numbers in that post....
Inside European Union, there are open borders between countries and no country was destroyed, all prosper more.Sounds like you may endorse open borders?
What better way to destroy a Country?
M
I didn't make the claim so don't hold your breath on me looking for it......Then you shouldn't have any trouble finding them. It is not the least bit controversial that the cost of single-payer will be about the same as what we are paying now and instead of what we are paying now.
Only if a person wants to dispute the actual numbers in my citation....I think that is reasonable....You must be missing things civilwarbuff. No one is required to post numbers in order to point out why those you posted are bogus.
Only if a person wants to dispute the actual numbers in my citation....I think that is reasonable....
No one particularly wants to dispute the numbers in your citation. I think we all know that they are made up, and nobody really expected anything else.Only if a person wants to dispute the actual numbers in my citation....I think that is reasonable....
So it is not reasonable for a person to support their opinion with actual citations?....wow, a new standard.....No, it is possible to point out errors in your numbers which is what happened. You can address it or ignore it but trying to pretend it did not happen is not helping your cause.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?