A Christian response to "No Kings."

[Akita Suggagaki]

The Supreme Court of the US ruled in favor of Trump when judges tried to rule against the executive branch, so
the article you posted is an opinion piece that failed.

Trump hasn't violated the constitution but upheld it completely.

Not every occurrence has been adjudicated by his SCOTUS. So even though you would like to summarily dismiss all complaints it is worth the time to read for anyone interested in the constitution.

 

[Clare73]

Not every occurrence has been adjudicated by this his SCOTUS.

The protestors have no one but themselves to blame if any "occurrence" has not been adjudicated by a Court of Law.

That's as good as it gets in the good ole' USofA.

 

[Michie]

The moderators can. . .report it.

They’d be awfully busy on both sides of the aisle

 

[Clare73]

They’d be awfully busy on both sides of the aisle

That's their job. . .

 

[Michie]

That's their job. . .

It’s the moderator’s job to report slander to the proper authorities? I used to be on staff and that’s the first I’ve heard of that.

 

[Clare73]

It’s the moderator’s job to report slander to the proper authorities? I used to be on staff and that’s the first I’ve heard of that.

The moderators are the proper authorities on this Board to whom slander by its members should be reported.

 

[Michie]

The moderators are the proper authorities on this Board to whom slander should be reported.

What constitutes slander on a message board? There are two side to every story. Two perspectives.

 

[Clare73]

What constitutes slander on a message board? There are two side to every story. Two perspectives.

The moderators are the authorities who get to decide the matter in question.

 

[Michie]

The moderators are the authorities who get to decide the matter in question.

Maybe within the rules of the board but not an official legal ruling from the proper authorities.