To become freinds - Science Club

[Cabal]

But it's okay for people like Timothy Leary to teach, isn't it?

Why is this a problem? Did he claim that education, understanding tech and critical thinking weren't important?

 

[Lillen]

So what is a doggydevil doing in university rethorics?

Or what is an Angel doing in university rhetorics? Is this what makes you hatch ideas?

 

[Lillen]

I need to hear about that Angel they use in university rhetorics - If that is what going to make me smarter!?

Romans 10:16
But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “LORD, who has believed our report?”

Jesus Christ has come in the flesh!

 

[AV1611VET]

Romans 10:16
But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “LORD, who has believed our report?”

Jesus Christ has come in the flesh!

Amen!

Isaiah gave a 52-chapter report on the deity of the Messiah; then, starting in chapter 53, he asks:

Isaiah 53:1 ¶ Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?

Isaiah is a Bible-within-the-Bible; i.e. 66 chapters, with each chapter corresponding to the 66 books of the Bible.

 

[pgp_protector]

Why is this a problem? Did he claim that education, understanding tech and critical thinking weren't important?

I think some may of taken too much of what he was doing to heart.

 

[Freodin]

We learn something new every day, don´t we?

I had never heard (at least not the I can remember) the term "clandestine". So I googled "clandestine chemistry"... and found that it refers to chemistry done in secret, mostly used in connection with producing illegal alcohol or drugs.

Somehow I don´t think that this is what Lillen means, though it would explain his wierd ideas - he´s his own best customer!

 

[Lillen]

Cladestine = Homelab.. usually in everyday term it connects with baking crack cocaine. But there is another view to look at it. for instance CIA have a master degree in cladestine chemistry, a degree that you can get payed to get (it do requires some good grades though). If you have seen McGuyver you will undestand what true Cladestine Chemistry includes.

I for one do not bake crack cocaine out of honeycombs, i do not bake Meth out of vicks inhalers. No that is against my faith. What i can do is refine sulfur from ordenary soil or earth (Dust, mud, whatever) to create sufluric acid to my car battery (atleast i have the theory, but since i do not own a car this is rather unimportant).

For now, when i got nothing else to do, i create wine out of water!!!

 

[Lillen]

And if you don't want to become freind with me under this topic, fine, stay away and clear the way for others who wants too!

I don't know what poe is, (skojjare in swedish parhaps). anyways, i done some observations, you didn't agree, we set aside and started to talk about alchemy and cladestine chemisry and my feild, now we don't even bother about your world view anymore! or do we!?

Anyways, shall we continue with science to become freinds here, and talk abuot science? Baking crack cocaine under moons surface is science fiction... we don't do that. or do we? What part has alchemy to do in science? Set aside the alchemy connect with false worship of false God' - which no christian should do since God promise to destroy whoever involved with sacrificing to false God's. As we speak of alchemy, do this still have something to do with science? can theology be suitable for creating sulfuric acid? They created sulfuric acid 1400 years ago without the modern knowledge in science... what say you can't use an old method even to this day?!

And moreover to jump from alchemy to your feild, how do we know hawking radiation evaporize the black hole? I gonna come to the point here as we continue our studies!

 

[pgp_protector]

And if you don't want to become freind with me under this topic, fine, stay away and clear the way for others who wants too!
...snip....

It's a public forum, anyone can post in this section.
You don't get to tell who can or can't post in the thread.
If you wish that sort of control, you will need to start your own forum.

 

[Lillen]

You're right!! my bad! But the thread was actually meant for us to become freinds, was it not? so i don't see any relevance in the posts that are no intention of becomeing freinds do you?

 

[pgp_protector]

If this thread is to make friends, then it's in the wrong area, as this is the Physical & Life Sciences sub forum

Physical & Life Sciences A forum for physics, biology, chemistry and other physical sciences.

You want the Friendship Court -> that way -> Friendship Court - Christian Forums

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

Amen!

Isaiah gave a 52-chapter report on the deity of the Messiah; then, starting in chapter 53, he asks:

Isaiah 53:1 ¶ Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?

Isaiah is a Bible-within-the-Bible; i.e. 66 chapters, with each chapter corresponding to the 66 books of the Bible.

Isaiah did no such thing.

"Many scholars therefore divide the book into three parts:[12]

• Chapters 1 to 39 (First Isaiah, Proto-Isaiah or Original Isaiah): the work of the original prophet Isaiah, who worked in Jerusalem between 740 and 687 BCE.[13]
• Chapters 40 to 55 (Second Isaiah or Deutero-Isaiah): by an anonymous author who lived in Babylon near the end of the Babylonian captivity.[12]:418
• Chapters 56 to 66 (Third Isaiah or Trito-Isaiah): the work of anonymous disciples committed to continuing Isaiah's work in the years immediately after the return from Babylon.[12]:444 This section includes visions of new heavens and new earth.[13] (Other scholars suggest that chapters 55-66 were written by Deutero-Isaiah after the fall of Babylon.)[5]. 561

This implied sequence of pre-exilic, exilic and post-exilic material is somewhat misleading, as significant editing has clearly taken place in all three parts.[14].183 There is some uncertainty as to how Deutero-Isaiah and Trito-Isaiah came to be attached to the original Isaiah: the two competing theories are either that Deutero-Isaiah was written as a continuation of Proto-Isaiah, or that it was written separately and became attached to the famous Isaiah later.[15]"

 

[AV1611VET]

You're right!! my bad! But the thread was actually meant for us to become freinds, was it not? so i don't see any relevance in the posts that are no intention of becomeing freinds do you?

Friend's request issued --

 

[AV1611VET]

There is some uncertainty as to how Deutero-Isaiah...

Why then did Jesus in Matthew 15:7 quote Isaiah 29:13; and in Luke 4:18 quote Isaiah 61:1 and say they came from the same author?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Why then did Jesus in Matthew 15:7 quote Isaiah 29:13; and in Luke 4:18 quote Isaiah 61:1 and say they came from the same author?

Because either he or at least one of the authors "quoting" him were wrong?

Either Matthew and/or Luke making the error would be more likely -- but if it turned out to be Jesus, it wouldn't be the only time he fumbled on the Old Testament.

 

[pgp_protector]

Why then did Jesus in Matthew 15:7 quote Isaiah 29:13; and in Luke 4:18 quote Isaiah 61:1 and say they came from the same author?

Putting words into Jesus' Mouth now?
Jesus doesn't say they came from the same author.

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

No mention of who wrote what.

Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

Opps that's not saying Isaiah but Esaias (you don't want to be changing words now do you?)

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

Why then did Jesus in Matthew 15:7 quote Isaiah 29:13; and in Luke 4:18 quote Isaiah 61:1 and say they came from the same author?

I'll take the most parsimonious answer for $500, Alex.

 

[Lillen]

The source of light's speed is not added or removed to the speed of light, even though you observe indepenantly from a inertial object according to you scientists! or?

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

The source of light's speed is not added or removed to the speed of light, even though you observe indepenantly from a inertial object according to you scientists! or?

"The wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'
I don't know where I'll be tomorrow
The wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'" -Perry

 

[Lillen]

Yeah i know i asked and argued around this before, But i never clearly understood the doppler effect on light. If the source of light is moving towards you and it creates a doppler shift to the blue and if it moves away from you a doppler shift to the red. But that is the frequency... Not the speed of light!

I was more thinking of an answer such as collapse of the universe and so on!