• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

To atheists...

MartinM

GondolierAce
Feb 9, 2003
4,215
258
44
Visit site
✟5,655.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Jet Black said:
oh I dunno. I think basic axioms like "I am" can't go to far amiss. or is that not quite ontology?

No, that's epistemology. You're a physicist, right? Let's try it this way:

In quantum mechanics, we have a description of how some aspect of reality functions, according to observation. That's epistemology. We also have several interpretations which purport to explain the nature of the reality that underlies our descriptive framework. That's ontology. While these ontological models may be useful to get an intuitive grasp on how the description operates, they don't tell us anything about reality. They only become useful, from an objective point of view, when they start making testable predictions. But then it ceases to be an ontological issue, and becomes an epistemic one.

Ontology is essentially the study of those aspects of reality which are independent of how we study them. Epistemology is the opposite. Unfortunately, like everything else in philosophy, these words have numerous different definitions.
 
Upvote 0
chipdouglas said:
Hey,
I am just curious as to what the beliefs of any atheists out there are in regard to creation; how humans and their surroundings came to be created. I am going to try not to respond to any suggestions; I am just curious as to what the different theories are between atheists. Personally I believe in what the Bible says but I'd like to hear what others believe. It doesn't have to be long-winded - i just stated my belief in one sentence - but feel free to explain what and why in detail if you are so inclined.

~chip
Since Atheism is the lack of Theism, therfore an atheist can not have certain beliefes, as you put it.
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Nathan David said:
But just for you I'll rephrase it: I don't have any beliefs about subjective facts.
Try again. George W. Bush's leadership of the country is a subjective fact. I'm betting that you have a belief about his leadership.

Do you have a significant other? Friends? If so, then you have subjective facts about their relationship to you. You believe that such a relationship exists.
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Gramps said:
Since Atheism is the lack of Theism, therfore an atheist can not have certain beliefes, as you put it.
Nice attempt to change definitions. Atheism is the belief that deity(ies) does not exist.

You didn't read my response to Chip. Atheists do indeed have to have certain beliefs:

Edwards "Apart from before the big bang I assume natural laws are the cause of our present universe." is telling. Notice the hidden statement of faith in this sentence: that "natural laws" operate without deity.

That's the essential belief of atheism. And an essential difference between atheistic evolution and theistic evolution. TEs believe that an intelligent entity is necessary for those "natural laws" to function.

So, both theistic (Christian) evolutionists and atheists accept the material processes discovered by science. The difference is that atheists believe those material processes -- natural laws -- operate on their own while Christians believe that God is necessary for them to work.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
MartinM said:
Ontology is essentially the study of those aspects of reality which are independent of how we study them. Epistemology is the opposite. Unfortunately, like everything else in philosophy, these words have numerous different definitions.
gotcha... I really should get one of these philosophy book things. it's an area I am sadly lacking in :(
 
Upvote 0

Nathan David

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2002
1,861
45
55
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟2,226.00
Faith
Atheist
lucaspa said:
Try again. George W. Bush's leadership of the country is a subjective fact. I'm betting that you have a belief about his leadership.

Do you have a significant other? Friends? If so, then you have subjective facts about their relationship to you. You believe that such a relationship exists.
My mistake; I meant to say I don't have beliefs about objective facts.

I have an opinion about GW Bush's leadership (hey, that's a great excuse to plug my 'blog!), but I wouldn't say I have a belief.

My "beliefs" that my relationships with friends, girlfriends, etc. exist are based on evidence. I would classify them more as understandings, and as understandings that could be wrong.
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Jet Black said:
oh I dunno. I think basic axioms like "I am" can't go to far amiss. or is that not quite ontology? It is a word that I am not incredibly familiar with in terms of use.
That's at the border.

"1 : a branch of metaphysics concerned with the nature and relations of being
2 : a particular theory about the nature of being or the kinds of existents"

So, saying "I exist" is partly ontological because it is stating one kind of 'existent" -- you.

It's also a starting point for epistemology because you can't know anything if you don't exist.

Ontology is generally thought of as describing what is ultimate reality. Not just the reality studied by science but all those things science can't touch: beauty, truth, honor, deities, etc.

Now, Nathan as an agnostic could well have no ontological beliefs. After all, that's what an agnostic is: someone suspending judgement until sufficient data is available.

My argument was the statement that he has no beliefs whatsoever. We all end up making judgements without sufficient data to do so or in the presence of only personal experience (not intersubjective). All those are "beliefs".
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟47,309.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Nathan David said:
My mistake; I meant to say I don't have beliefs about objective facts.

I have an opinion about GW Bush's leadership (hey, that's a great excuse to plug my 'blog!), but I wouldn't say I have a belief.
It's pretty much the same thing. An opinion is simply a lightly held belief. Or maybe yours isn't lightly held.

My "beliefs" that my relationships with friends, girlfriends, etc. exist are based on evidence. I would classify them more as understandings, and as understandings that could be wrong.
But the evidence is personal and not intersubjective. In fact, for girlfriends if the evidence were intersubjective then you would reject it! :)

"Understandings" based solely on personal experience are also beliefs. After all, theists who understand deity based on the evidence of their personal experience are said to "believe", aren't they?

Belief is not a nasty word. The problem comes when we mistake our beliefs for facts.
 
Upvote 0

Michali

Teleologist
Aug 1, 2003
2,287
36
40
Florida
✟25,139.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I believe that there is nothing wrong with going ahead and believing someting. And if it is thought to be proven false, simply make the choice whether to disbelieve it or not. -I actually just posted this for 50 blessings, my current signature could be freindly to God-haters. I gotta change it.
 
Upvote 0

Philosoft

Orthogonal, Tangential, Tenuously Related
Dec 26, 2002
5,427
188
52
Southeast of Disorder
Visit site
✟6,503.00
Faith
Atheist
lucaspa said:
Nice attempt to change definitions. Atheism is the belief that deity(ies) does not exist.
How about you let the atheists describe themselves?
Edwards "Apart from before the big bang I assume natural laws are the cause of our present universe." is telling. Notice the hidden statement of faith in this sentence: that "natural laws" operate without deity.
Natural laws are objective, deity isn't. Why does it take faith to refrain from explaining observations with speculations? Do I have faith that my computer operates without deity?
That's the essential belief of atheism. And an essential difference between atheistic evolution and theistic evolution. TEs believe that an intelligent entity is necessary for those "natural laws" to function.
How does atheism entail a belief about evolution?
So, both theistic (Christian) evolutionists and atheists accept the material processes discovered by science. The difference is that atheists believe those material processes -- natural laws -- operate on their own while Christians believe that God is necessary for them to work.
Atheists are under no obligation to explain natural laws. They can form beliefs if they wish, but it's certainly possible to accept the observations and consequences consistent with natural laws without attempting to explain why they work.
 
Upvote 0