Thoughts about using a KJV update?

[pescador]

I'm talking about that website source where you pulled from being corrupt, GotQuestions.org.

GotQuestions.org is an excellent resource for all things Biblical. It is NOT corrupt in the slightest. Now, but to the OP subject...

 

[robycop3]

GotQuestions.org is an excellent resource for all things Biblical. It is NOT corrupt in the slightest. Now, but to the OP subject...

Davy doesn't like it cuz it's against the KJVO myth.

 

[GreekOrthodox]

GotQuestions.org is an excellent resource for all things Biblical. It is NOT corrupt in the slightest. Now, but to the OP subject...

Personally, I REALLY dont find them useful except when debating Protestants. They do not have an "about us" section that discloses their biases.

 

[Davy]

GotQuestions.org is an excellent resource for all things Biblical. It is NOT corrupt in the slightest. Now, but to the OP subject...

Sure...

 

[Shane R]

Roby, any idea if is this obsession with the TR and KJV is uniquely American?

The TR obsession is not uniquely American. It has taken hold throughout Spanish speaking fundamentalist churches as well.

 

[GreekOrthodox]

The TR obsession is not uniquely American. It has taken hold throughout Spanish speaking fundamentalist churches as well.

Interesting! We Greek Orthodox don't have an official English translation, but our recognized NT Scriptures is the 1904 Patriarchal edition which was assembled completely separately from western texts.

 

[BibleBeliever5]

Disregard

 

[Quasiblogo]

Just keep the lyrical feel and avoid the references to NU not including or NU says.

 

[robycop3]

There are already 2 KJV updates-the MEV, which is a language update, and the NKJV, which is a new translation from the mss. used to make the AV 1611.