seebs
God Made Me A Skeptic
- Apr 9, 2002
- 31,917
- 1,530
- 20
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
eldermike said:In a way, we have a Nicene creed issue here. If a Christian allows God to have only one person, they do not actually hold the creed at all.
Indeed.
If leaving out "The Son" = the same God, is that not a challenge to the Nicene creed?
No. It would be a challenge to the creed to hold that such a belief is true. But the question here is whether we are talking about different entities, or differences of opinion about the nature of a single entity.
For it to be different entities, you would need to be able to tell me which creator of all things these people are talking about who isn't the one we follow.
Making false claims about God doesn't mean you're talking about a different entity; it means you're mistaken about the nature of the same entity.
So; to say that "a god" with some historical basis, but with another name, one person, Is the same God as the God described in the creed, totally denies the Nicene creed, not to mention, the actually authorship of the bible itself.
But no one's saying that. What they're saying is that people may have all sorts of false beliefs about the one true God, but still be unambiguously denoting that God. Who else could they mean? Did anyone else create the world? Not that I'm aware of.
In other words...
If I talk about "eldermike, the CF poster", I'm talking about you. If I say "eldermike is 39 years old", then I'm obviously wrong, but I'm still talking about you. If I say "eldermike is an Anglican", I'm obviously wrong, but I'm still talking about you. The identification I do provide ("the poster at CF called eldermike") is unambiguous. There's no question of whom I'm talking about.
If I talk about "the God who created everything and made a covenant with Abraham", there is only one God I can possibly be talking about, no matter how confused I am about that God's nature.
Upvote
0