This has got to be an Onion article, right?

[MrSpikey]

That's a good question. It seems it would be easy to forge a document and it's certainly easy to fake a photo. I suppose there are ways to authenticate much of it.

Evaluating evidence is always a good thing, as far as I'm concerned.

 

[MrSpikey]

Just remember though that the info on the DNC fixing the primary so that Hillary would be the choice no matter what turned out to be true.

How is that relevant? Whilst not illegal, evidence came out about shoddy practices during the primary, and heads have rolled.

What does that have to do with believing evidence from untrustworthy sources?

 

[MrSpikey]

Nit pick. He's right on this.

If you weren't enemies with them at the time, it's hardly a nit pick - it's his entire point.

 

[MrSpikey]

They were unfriendlies we used to attain a goal; Russia was kicked out......

Is "unfriendlies" an official diplomatic term now?

How often do you give large amounts of money, weapons and military training to "unfriendlies"? Sounds pretty damn cordial to me.

 

[civilwarbuff]

Nit pick. He's right on this.

Debating against willful ignorance is usually a waste of time......

 

[TLK Valentine]

They were unfriendlies we used to attain a goal; Russia was kicked out......

We used them, and then -- shockingly -- we didn't consider the consequences of our actions!

 

[TLK Valentine]

Is "unfriendlies" an official diplomatic term now?

How often do you give large amounts of money, weapons and military training to "unfriendlies"? Sounds pretty damn cordial to me.

Well, gosh -- we armed people who were unfriendly to us and then acted surprised when they eventually used those arms against our interests...

Who saw that coming?