The Supreme Court has ruled that former presidents are immune from official acts undertaken during their presidencies.
www.newsweek.com
When pressed by Collins whether using a "false slates of electors" would constitute enough for a trial, Scharf denied that the Trump team had used false slates and said using "alternate slates" was an "official act."
He said: "We would say alternate slates of electors and as we argued before the
Supreme Court, alternate slates of electors have been a method used by previous presidents."
He continued: "We believe the assembly of those alternate slates of electors was an official act of the presidency."