That really makes no sense at all.
Once again, F = G m1 m2 / d^2 and a = F / m2 implies that acceleration, in the absence of an atmosphere, is independent of the mass of the falling object.
This answers nothing for me, G/g^2 times the globes wobble at 66.6 degrees, minus the moons gravity / by the gravity pulling the solar system on the fabric of Spacetime, .. whatever, .. you could go on and on avoiding this simple experiment that proves gravity is fake.
Unless you show me what each of your letters represent, it is meaningless. An obvious diversion.
Are you saying Force = Gravity times mass1 times mass 2 divided by diameter of the what, .. the feather squared?? What does this have anything to do with proving gravity in mass?
OK, again; let's examine the
feather/bowling ball drop in the vacuum. We seen that they both hit the ground at the same time! They didn't show math, just the two objects falling, correct? When they show the Mars Lander on Mars, there is no math on screen explaining all that. When they shown the moon landing, again, no math. So let's see if we can test this exparimewnt and see if its gravity aka g-force that's pulling them down?
Now let's make two rockets, each with enough force to lift just the bowling ball off the floor of the vacuum chamber.
Now put the feather on one rocket, and the Bowling ball on the other.
start them both at the same time, which rocket will rise faster?
I say the one with the feather on it, a no brainer there.
If it is g-force pulling on them both, then the exact same thrust set to lift the bowling ball should counter the exact g-force of your globe (
we will ignore the g-force of the bowling ball like both you guys and NASA scientists do) and it is not what NASA claims to prove gravity.
Another observation: when the rocket
just lifts the bowling ball, the force would be 10 lbs. and not this falling rate g-force of 9.807 m/s^2, correct? That there also proves there is no force inherent in mass since rockets are made to "lift weight", and not designed to go at a certain speed! In other words, we don't say: "Well, to lift this object we'll have to go 9.807 m/s^2 or whatever. But we say: we need enough thrust to lift 10 lbs. Or 10lbs of thrust. We also don't say: "We need 200 horses going 60 mph to move this car".
Now a 10lb. lift on the feather would obviously shoot that feather up much, much faster (still keeping it simple)any objections?
What would this two
equal thrust rocket experiment also show? It would also show that IF there was a Force pulling on the feather and the bowling ball, "the feather should have fallen first, because you guys claim your globes gravity is constant, meaning the same force on all objects. (
ignoring the g-force that should be present in the 10lb. mass until you get into space) but that is NOT what happened, because there is NO Force Pulling. Just like the 9.807 m/s^2 named as "gravity" proves that NASA knows that things fall, not being pulled.
The rocket experiment has both rockets creating the same "force", which is dialed in on just lifting the bowling ball.
But we know that since the feather has less mass/weight than the bowling ball, the second rocket we put the feather on would take off like a rocket (keeping it simple), while the other rocket with the bowling ball on it is barely hovering off the ground.
* Is this not the perfect counter-test to see if there is g-force on your globe or not? Or you guys know this proves that this gravity pulling force does not exist, so you're going to go back giving me some fantastic space-math you yourselves have no clue about?
Did you mean Houston, perhaps?
Oh please, looking for mistakes ey?