• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The universe at the end of this sentence.

Selmak

Held in trust
Aug 8, 2008
57,571
9,101
✟110,122.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's fine. But it's not a good argument against it being done through naturalistic processes such as, say, the big bang or evolution. Because if you don't know how he did it, you can't say that he didn't do it that way. Since god could do it any way he chose, it doesn't bring us any closer to understanding how he did it. It's an unnecessary step in the explanatory process to include it. In the words of Laplace, "Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là."

I see. It may not explain 'how' something occurred, but it sure does explain why.

Do you know 'how' the universe began?
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
I see. It may not explain 'how' something occurred, but it sure does explain why.

Not really. "God did it" doesn't explain why he did it.

Do you know 'how' the universe began?

Nope. Can't even say for sure that it did begin.
 
Upvote 0

Greg1234

In the beginning was El
May 14, 2010
3,745
38
✟19,292.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Right. Which is why it is not an adequate answer to a "how" question. Even if you accept that the "who" was god, the appropriate response to "how" is not "god did it" but rather "I don't know."

When we convene, refuting materialistic explanations is sufficient. Physical science is not the appropriate field and the how remains beyond its grasp.


geologist: Blood clotting is caused by earthquakes

Micro biologist- No it isn't (earthquake theory refuted)

g- So you think you can just refute my theory? Where's the evidence that your enzymes cause blood clotting. Provide geological evidence.

mb- using your eyes you can see that the process conforms to the enzymatic actions.

g- So thats it?

mb-- thats all that can be given

g- So enzymes did it

mb- yes

g- that's not a seismographic explanation

mb- no it isn't

g- this will not get published in a geography journal

mb- no it wont

g- [something about geography doesnt deal with enzymes, gnomes, fairies and other imaginary beings]

mb- they aren't needed, see the perceptible portion of the blood clotting phenomenon explained in Enzymatic Design.

g- fairies did it. Faries are causing the blood clots

mb- you could call them that if you want.

g- All hail the flying spaghetti monster, king of blood clotting

mb- different name, it doesnt matter. Again see Enzymatic Design

g- no

mb- fine

g- new evidence that earthquakes cause blood clotting

mb- this was refuted.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
I see. It may not explain 'how' something occurred, but it sure does explain why.

Do you know 'how' the universe began?

We've looked at the universe and come up with a working idea.

Have you looked at the universe lately?
 
Upvote 0

Selmak

Held in trust
Aug 8, 2008
57,571
9,101
✟110,122.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We've looked at the universe and come up with a working idea.

Have you looked at the universe lately?

Dang, now I'm toe to toe with Mr Poe himself, as I predicted would happen in post 82. :(

Okay, give me a second, I have to collect myself. :sigh:

Okay, okay, I think I can proceed.

Yes, I've looked at the universe lately, isn't God's creation magnificent? :holy:
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Dang, now I'm toe to toe with Mr Poe himself, as I predicted would happen in post 82. :(

Okay, give me a second, I have to collect myself. :sigh:

I would've been here sooner, but I've been on -- well, let's just call it a hiatus and leave it at that.

Okay, okay, I think I can proceed.

Yes, I've looked at the universe lately, isn't God's creation magnificent? :holy:

So, nothing except "Ooo... pretty!"?
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,884
17,790
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟452,346.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Some people are happy to stop there -- unfortunately, they're not all that happy with people who don't want to stop there.

Afraid of what they'll find?

Some people don't like others looking behind the curtain.
Alice-looking-behind-the-curtain.jpg
 
Upvote 0

antde2001

Newbie
Jul 11, 2011
69
1
✟22,705.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
There are two things about me that need clarification:

  1. I only come across as "trashing science" because I address those parts of science that oppose the Bible. If you've known me for any length of time, you'll know that I actually hold science up to a Higher Standard than you guys do; and even claim scientists are gifted to us from God.
  2. Half of what I come up with -- I have to. As I have said before, you guys don't ask me what's in the Bible; rather, you gear your questions as to what's not in the Bible, trying to pry a constant chain of "I don't know" answers from us; and I don't go that route. I won't think twice about speculating, to avoid being forced to say, "I don't know." Questions like, 'Where did the waters of the Flood go?' will bring out my artistic side. I think it's disingenuous to ask me such questions, then say that 'half of what I come up with isn't in the Bible at all.' If you can't make me look bad one way, you'll make me look bad another; and believe me, I don't need you guys to look bad; I can do it on my own just fine.

Can't argue that. This thread has reached its end.
 
Upvote 0