33% Masons worship Lucifer{Satan} and believe he's GOD,and not CHRIST. So you in the lower ranks have been deceived. And are partakers in a Satanic occult of Albert Pike:
"“Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not!”"
The point of my starting this thread was to discuss the idea that symbols are often misunderstood and misrepresented, particularly when taken out of context. @SeraphimsCherub illustrates this point beautifully.
To this I make the following comments:
1. Etymology
Anyone who bothers to pick up a dictionary or do a quick Google search will discover that "Lucifer" simply means "light-bringer". Its association with Satan is only seen in more contemporary writings. Look it up.
2. Context
The "Lucifer quote" is almost always taken out of context. An honest read of the ENTIRE paragraph, which comments on the
Apocalypse, aka the
Book of Revelation, reveals a completely different take:
The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apothesis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls ? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired. The Apocalypse, indeed, is a book as obscure as the Sohar. It is written hieroglyphically with numbers and images; and the Apostle often appeals to the intelligence of the Initiated. "Let him who hath knowledge, understand! let him who understands, calculate !" he often says, after an allegory or the mention of a number. Saint John, the favorite Apostle, and the Depositary of all the Secrets of the Saviour, therefore did not write to be understood by the multitude.
3. Comprehension
Do @SeraphimsCherub, and anti-Masonic proponents, even comprehend what he wrote? Read the quote. Read it word for word. Read in context. Pike is clearly stating that all the alluring false splendor that Lucifer brings, blinds those who are open to his draw. It is actually an excellent statement that describes how Lucifer deceives and how, as Christians, we should be on our guard against such deceit.
4. Association
Albert Pike is clearly associated with Freemasonry, but he certainly does not speak for Freemasonry, or even the Scottish Rite. Albert Pike's writings, while very influential in the Scottish Rite, exemplify his obsession with comparative religion. He was a broad thinker for his time, and his works illustrate that. Yet
Morals and Dogma is NOT required reading for ANY Freemason, Scottish Rite or otherwise. In fact, the Scottish Rite pretty much dismisses the work as being useful for knowledge, but not representing Freemasonry. Try reading the "Introduction" to
Morals and Dogma, and you will see what I mean.
This is, of course, MY interpretation. I am open to any correction or education .