The Sun

[Justatruthseeker]

As I said in another post:

How would you explain all these differences?

Electromagnetic forces. The solar wind is composed of plasma, an electrically charged medium. The ecliptic plane is where the electrical forces are the most balanced. It is craft passing sharply against this ecliptic that build up an imbalance of charge upon their surfaces.

One need only look at Enceladus and the rings of Saturn to see this electromagnetic force at work.

Saturn's Electric Moon Enceladus, Part One | Space News - YouTube

Saturn's Electric Moon Enceladus, Part Two | Space News - YouTube

Just as it explains the stoppage of the solar wind. Acceleration and deceleration of charged particles is only accomplished through electric fields and voltage differentials.

Space News | Voyager 1 Mystery: Solar Wind Ceases - YouTube

Just as this effect is the cause of radiation.
Bremsstrahlung - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's only too bad Voyager did not have equipment for detecting the so-called background radiation. An interesting result would occur I am sure. After all, charged particles don't just stop without giving off radiation, and the heliopause is a 360 degree sphere. Basically the same except where flares would send an excess of charged particles and produce a slightly higher area of radiation, and sunspots the reverse, leading one to an overall homogeneity broken by occasional hotspots and voids. Hmmm......

With of course the equatorial plane being the most concentrated. Like a highway.

Voyager 1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voyager has discovered a new region of the heliosphere that we had not realized was there. "We're still inside, apparently. But the magnetic field now is connected to the outside. So it's like a highway letting particles in and out."

Voyager 1 Confirms Electric Heliosphere | thunderbolts.info

Solar physics is going to upset it all. Even the CMB data IMO as soon as we get something out there that can detect it. That the solar wind would suddenly stop without giving off radiation is actually incomprehensible with what we know. IMO it's more local then was ever dreamed in any previous argument or theory.

 

[Greatcloud]

IDK if this is relevent to this thread but has anyone considered the 200 year cycle of the Sun when you refer to it these days ?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

IDK if this is relevent to this thread but has anyone considered the 200 year cycle of the Sun when you refer to it these days ?

I believe there are cycles we are not even aware of yet. Just as a few years ago we were not even aware of a source of energy being pumped into the Earth besides solar heat.

Scientists discover surprise in Earth's upper atmosphere / UCLA Newsroom

Just as the winds of Venus have increased from 186 mph to 249 mph in six years.

Venus' howling winds inexplicably get stronger - NBC News.com

Is it coincident global warming has coincided with these events?

According to geologists every part of our planets was once covered by jungle, so our atmosphere was once a lot warmer. Also it was once almost completely covered in ice, so our atmosphere was once a lot cooler as well.

Which throws out internal heating from the core else ice would never have formed almost planetwide if their theory of the Earth's core was correct. I am quite sure that neanderthal man did not cause the end of the ice age by too many campfires causing global warming.

It is simply cycles that the Sun goes through depending on where it is at in the galactic current streams.

Something along those lines exists.

Perturbing the Oort Cloud » American Scientist

Not that I believe the fantasized Oort cloud is the source of comets. It is the Sun passing back and forth across the ecliptic of the Milky-Way.

 

[Heissonear]

JTS

Learning more about the sun through your posts is great!

I'm wondering what correlations of late to sun output to the ~1978-1998 warming period, and now in relation to a quieting solar sun spots from cycle 24 leading on to cycle 25?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

JTS

Learning more about the sun through your posts is great!

I'm wondering what correlations of late to sun output to the ~1978-1998 warming period, and now in relation to a quieting solar sun spots from cycle 24 leading on to cycle 25?

Nah, don't take my word for nothing. I merely am presenting what I believe to be a logical sequence of hypothesis that I believe are supported by observation. I expect not only mainstream theories to be challenged, but anyones.

Observtion without theory doesn't work, but neither does theory without observation. And neither certainly work without laboratory experimentation.

Which we have, just with ignoring the electric fields they use to cause the phenomenon, then ascribing it solely to magnetism. From solar flares:

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Solar flare 'reproduced' in lab

To galactic jets:

http://t8web.lanl.gov/people/heitmann/cosmoday2/TALKS/hsu.pdf

Because they call plasma a "hot gas" which it certainly is not:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

The presence of a non-negligible number of charge carriers makes the plasma electrically conductive so that it responds strongly to electromagnetic fields. Plasma, therefore, has properties quite unlike those of solids, liquids, or gases and is considered a distinct state of matter.

Why NASA says:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/rb...tmosphere.html

Our day-to-day lives exist in what physicists would call an electrically neutral environment. Desks, books, chairs and bodies don't generally carry electricity and they don't stick to magnets. But life on Earth is substantially different from, well, almost everywhere else. Beyond Earth's protective atmosphere and extending all the way through interplanetary space, electrified particles dominate the scene. Indeed, 99% of the universe is made of this electrified gas, known as plasma.

They just need to quit thinking of it like a "hot gas" and for what it is. Plasma, an electrified medium.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

JTS

Learning more about the sun through your posts is great!

I'm wondering what correlations of late to sun output to the ~1978-1998 warming period, and now in relation to a quieting solar sun spots from cycle 24 leading on to cycle 25?

Its hard to correlate as we have only been studying the sun and aware of cycles for such a brief time. We got what, maybe 20 years of good data on the sun? Most recent with the advancement of satllites and probes sent to monitor the sun.

I still think it all has to do with the Sun's position relative to the galactic ecliptic plane. We are currently receding from the ecliptic, and therefore building up charge differential in relation to the galaxy.

Just as our craft exhibited unexplained phenomenon passing across the ecliptic of the Sun or Earth.

NASA Baffled by Unexplained Force Acting on Space Probes | Space.com

I believe it is the same process, excess charge being built up. One can see this effect in the rings of Saturn.

Saturn's Electric Moon Enceladus, Part Two | Space News - YouTube

Coincidence? Guess we will have to wait and see.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOIlIMdJV5k

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telluric_current

If you really want to understand the Sun, Earth and universe, I would suggest some basic electromagnetic field theory.

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/302l/lectures/lectures.html

I got no answers, just more questions