- Oct 11, 2020
- 4,742
- 1,778
- 39
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee, ok let’s play your game. This is really not about science or as you say a scientific definition, it is far more sinister than that. When my daughter was born I was present to witness that miraculous event. When SHE came into the world the doctor did not test HER chromosomes, a mere visual inspection was sufficient for the doctor. Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies. We are really not dealing so much with science here as we are an EVIL ideology. The reason the Supreme Court nominee did not want to answer the question was not because she couldn’t answer, it was because she was afraid to potentially upset the woke crowd. This evil ideology being thrust on many of our young children in some schools is the real issue. You can be the gender you feel like you should be is meant to confuse and point young innocent children into an alternate life style. That is the bottom line here it is an evil movement with no redeeming qualities. The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us. Would you like to engage in a spiritual Bible based discussion on this topic that would really get to the heart of what is happening in America today?
You didn't give any definition at all. So after several refusals, I showed you what it is. You think people didn't notice?
Here's the kicker; sometimes, doctors get it wrong for various biological reasons. Occasionally, the error continues until puberty. I'm just amused by the fact that those on the far right are outraged that a Supreme Court nominee didn't offer a definition of "woman" when almost none of them are capable of doing so.
Excuses and evasions notwithstanding. Learn from this.
(Postvieww mentions republican senators' difficulty in knowing what a woman is)
As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.
I'm pretty sure Schumer knows what a woman is. As you see, at least some of the republican senators can't figure it out. Chuck could help them.
what about females that can't bear children? What are they?The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm.
what about females that can't bear children? What are they?
You want to display your knowledge on everything but the real reason this topic is even in today’s discussion. Of course there are women who for various physical reasons cannot bear children. But when God created woman is was to be a companion for man and to bear children to perpetuate the human race.
Actually not what I said at all
I was hoping you would share what you think that would sound like only because I am curious.
Where are you Barb. let's take a stand.
What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?
you dismissed his point but my question remains.I acknowledged that in a previous response to Barb. see below.
What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?
Wow is that what you call taking a stand??????
you dismissed his point but my question remains.
How impressive now can you tell us what is really behind the evil agenda of liberals to pervert our children with sexual indoctrination. No you won’t address that you just divert with sophomoric comedy.You don't read carefully. Already showed you what the proper definition of a woman is. "An adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."
You have mastered the art of diversion!Gaetz is looking for another girlfriend?
I call him "kinda creepy."
Rep Matt Gaetz ‘DID pay for sex’ with minor girl, 17, ‘wingman’ Joel Greenberg claims in leaked ‘confession letter’
Gaetz 'DID pay for sex' with minor girl, 17, pal admits in leaked letter
I have no issues with the scientific definition my concern is how that relates to boys that feel like they are girls being allowed in girls bathrooms and what that has to do with drag queens doing story time in some elementary schools. Can you explain that Barb. cannot. Ps I did answer your question it just was not the answer you were looking for, sorry about that.you dismissed his point but my question remains.
You have mastered the art of diversion!
How impressive now can you tell us what is really behind the evil agenda of liberals to pervert our children with sexual indoctrination.
No, the question is still hanging thereI have no issues with the scientific definition my concern is how that relates to boys that feel like they are girls being allowed in girls bathrooms and what that has to do with drag queens doing story time in some elementary schools. Can you explain that Barb. cannot. Ps I did answer your question it just was not the answer you were looking for, sorry about that.
Just what is it exactly you don’t understand about the creation of man and woman? What is it about the fall in the Genesis account you don’t understand? Would it make more sense to you if I said women after the fall who could not bear children were missing the Y chromosome but had a physical problem that caused them to not have the ability to bear children. That changes nothing about the answer I gave to your question. Before the fall of man (and woman) God never intended that some women would be barren just like He never intended for some women to get breast cancer. The fall did happen and some women without the Y chromosome are barren and some without the Y chromosome get breast cancer. Is that clear now?No, the question is still hanging there
This answers my question about liberal agendas how? Any individual can indulge in immoral conduct having liberal or conservative politics, and many have from all sides of the political spectrum. That is irrelevant to the issues I have brought up here. What conservative group is promoting drag queen story time for elementary aged children or which conservative group is pushing to allow males with gender confusion into women’s bathrooms. Tell me do those with such confusion have the Y chromosome or not? Shall we test them to verify their confusion?Sure.
I am not afraid to discuss anything with you creepy or not. I still believe you are a master of diversion. But then again in my experience that is a common trait among liberals. Is there a chromosome for that? Just kidding you do have a sense of humor don’t you?Don't bring up the subject, if you don't want to talk about it. I'd show you, but it's way too creepy for this site.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?