What you made is a false statement that we don't believe in Christ. i submit that the Christ we believe in as Baha'is is much closer to the Biblical one than the Christ you believe in as a mormon.
Ah, I see we are bringing out the boxing gloves.
That was not my statement. The claim was made that "we believe Christ," and I showed you do NOT. Baha'i reject His words, and therefore do not believe Him. Now you may "believe in Christ" in the sense that you believe He existed, but that is a different matter entirely. The devils believe He exists and flee from Him.
Then don't criticize us if we don't take the Bible as inerrant.
I am pointing out that Baha'i do not believe His words recorded for us. These appear only in the Bible. The Quran records none of His words but just mentions Jeshua. So no the Baha'i reject the most basic points of His gospel. It is one thing to not hold the Bible as inerrant, but another to reject all the most basic parts of the teachings of Jeshua and yet claim to believe Him....to do that one has to take a butcher knife to the New Testament, the very words of Jesus recorded therein and the testimony of all the apostles therein.
And i also believe in the integrity of scripture.
If it is the "Holy Quran." You are sounding like Pres Obama to me who criticizes the Bible and calls the Quran holy. I can go into the Quran's many faults, but that is not the point of this thread.
uh, no. you had showed us disagreeing with what others had to say about Christ.
Uh yes, also His own words - for example His words that He had hands and feet after His resurrection - not as a spirit. His own words that He is the Son of God, etc.
So do we.[but],
he didn't say anything about being physically resurrected.
While I do not wish to misrepresent your beliefs, this is simply untrue. He said several times in different ways He would rise again after dying. He said He had to raise up "this tabernacle" etc. He said he would be resurrected, and physically appeared to His disciples to prove He was physically resurrected.
Really? i thought mormons believed the heavenly Father had lots of kids.
While He is the "Father of spirits" and there were other "sons of God" Jesus was the only begotten Son - in other words the only one with the birth right of inheritance.
huh? you do realize that Baha'u'llah means the Glory of God?
But you rely upon the Quran, and it claims Allah does not share his glory and has no Son.
how do we get from there to atonement? That keeps popping up in the most irrelevant places. if you want to talk about what Baha'is believe about atonement feel free to start a new thread on the subject. i'm guessing you haven't the foggiest idea what we believe on this subject yet you keep insisting we deny it.
I don't believe I have talked about it much, but suffice it to say that Baha'is do not believe in the atonement as I understand it. The atonement is quite far reaching and gets into the oracles of God, which Baha'i clearly do not understand. However, I hold this to be true of "Christians" as well so try not to be offended. I will constantly talk about aspects of the atonement, so if you bear with me, you should eventually begin to understand my POV.