- Mar 25, 2005
- 15,422
- 7,574
- 66
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
The Question is not
To be or not to be
but rather
I AM?
To be or not to be
but rather
I AM?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Had a similar thought a ways back...went something like -
The question is not "to be, or not to be ?"
'Cause if we're asking questions, we obviously already "are" !
The question is, "where are we heading ?" And, "what will we become ?"
But maybe that's what Shakespeare (or whoever actually came up with the leading question) was referring to, in a somewhat cryptic/roundabout way ?
Peace & Love in Christ,
wm

It could be - though I think that being in his books was understood differently than simply existing, whenever, wherever, whatever or however.
I AM?
is the real question we all ought to ponder on it seems to me.![]()
In my mind, "it" would be "Am I ?" as "I Am" is declarative in nature.
And after looking into the Shakespeare quote a bit, it appears the saying, "to be or not to be", is in reference to something along the lines of this passage of Scripture -
For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better:
Nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you. <-----> Philippians 1:23+24
Or in other words - to choose to go on living this mortal life, or choose to die and "meet one's Maker". ( Not that Paul was implying suicide...but rather martyrdom.)
May The Lord Be Pleased !
wm
I AM must be found if our I am wants to go on existing you see - so not - to be or not to be - nor am I - but I AM is the question of importance.Didn't Shakespeare die of syphilis? He rarely supported his wife and cheated on her to. Consider the source of that question (rhetorical question). He was probably considering what woman to visit in the next town and dreaming of Queen Elizabeth.

Didn't Shakespeare die of syphilis? He rarely supported his wife and cheated on her to. Consider the source of that question (rhetorical question). He was probably considering what woman to visit in the next town and dreaming of Queen Elizabeth.
I feel that speculation will not reveal as much as his statement does - from all perspectives - to be or not to be - misses The Truth of our - I AM by a great divide - and so he displays his ignorance about both right and wrong, as far as I'm concerned.
![]()
Well to be fair, it's doubtful that that line from Hamlet is intended to address the universal question to end all questions.
It likely was only meant to address it's own immediate context.
Which apparently was, should I seek to go on living (in pleasure), or seek/ fight unto death.
And in the context of the "play" and/or "tragedy" , this was spoken by a man (Hamlet - Prince of Denmark), who was greatly distressed/perplexed.
As far as questions go - what Pilate asked Jesus may be nearly the ultimate.
Pilate saith unto him, What is truth?...<---> John 18:38
May The Lord Be Pleased !
wm

Like I said......
I AM
is The One we best keep an eye on, when we experience Pilate's dilemma! As not to simply hand Him over to be crucified to the mob missing The Truth, The Light and The Life, bringing judgment on ourselves.
Don't you think?
![]()