The Problem with Creation Science

[Vance]

I posted this in another thread, but I thought it might be its own topic.

The problem with most Creationist scientific proposals is that they are believed primarily because they fit the Creationist model, not at all because they are the best supported by the evidence or sound scientific principles. If a scientific conclusion does not fit the model, it must be wrong, no matter how well-supported. If a scientific conclusion fits the Creationist model, they will assume it to be true until convinced otherwise, no matter how little-supported it is.

This is not an approach likely to lead to the truth about God's Creation.

 

[obediah]

NONSENSE! of the highest order. The evidence we find supports creation even the eye wittness catastrophees like Mt st. Helens.

 

[Tenacious-D]

NONSENSE! of the highest order. The evidence we find supports creation even the eye wittness catastrophees like Mt st. Helens.

The evidence does not support that. Hence it was rejected nigh upon 200 years ago by Creationists themselves.