• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Does this mean, view points that are different from your own should not be allowed on this site?
It would seem so...
Disputing the Bible and calling its teachings false, or an outright lie, is another. (Suggesting that the Biblical creation account is an outdated myth because it's not supported by current scientific evidence for instance).
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Do you have examples of personal attacks against you, vs your scientific view points simply being questioned?
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
When I say "objective", I mean the ability to pull back and look at the big picture in light of all available evidence to see what's actually true. If you want to call it subjective objectivity, then that's fine.
It's ok with you if I accept generally held meanings of words? Thanks.
 
Reactions: bhsmte
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Do you have examples of personal attacks against you, vs your scientific view points simply being questioned?

I wasn't referring to personal attacks. Re-read what I wrote.


Where in what I wrote do I refer to attacks made against me personally? I am speaking generally about what I have observed happening all over this site, and I am merely pointing out that such conduct is a violation of the rules of this forum.

Also, I am not talking about my own views on science here. Violating forum rules is not acceptable, and we all agreed to the rules when we signed up.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

On this particular section of the site, if you havent figured out why non believers engagenin discussion, you have not been paying attention.

It is typical, for those that hold beliefs that dont hold up to objective scrutiny, to cry foul when someone else points out the content of certain posts and why they are flawed.

Those defense mechanisms, start working overtime.
 
Reactions: HitchSlap
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Then please, by all means, give specific examples of others violating site rules and be sure to report them.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
This.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Does this mean, view points that are different from your own should not be allowed on this site?

Of course different viewpoints should be allowed on this site, I already acknowledged that. What isn't allowed, as per forum rules, however, is blasphemy and mockery of God, the Bible or the Christian faith. Non-Christians do not have to agree with Christians, but they are not to call Christianity, the Bible or God a "myth" or a "fairytale." (Or other similar terms). This is the conduct I was referring to.

Blasphemy and Contempt of Christianity

"It is considered blasphemy to insult or mock Christianity or any part of the Trinity-Father (God), Son (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit. Honest debate about the nature of God and Christian Theology is allowed, but derogatory remarks are not. Contemptuous remarks regarding Christianity or Christian practices are not allowed."

"Those who do not adhere to the Statement of Faith are welcome as members and participants in discussions, but you are required to respect these beliefs, even if you do not share them."

"By using this website, you acknowledge your acceptance and understanding of these rules. These rules apply to all communications made on this site."

http://www.christianforums.com/help/rules/
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I will repeat.

Please give specific examples of posters violating site rules and feel free to report them as well.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Disputing the Bible and calling its teachings false, or an outright lie, is another. (Suggesting that the Biblical creation account is an outdated myth because it's not supported by current scientific evidence for instance).
Disputing a literal interpretation of the Bible, and calling teachings derived from such an interpretation into question (e.g., Young Earth Creationism), is not a violation of the rules.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I will repeat.

Please give specific examples of posters violating site rules and feel free to report them as well.

I am not naming names, read the conversations on this thread and others in the general sections of this forum. Are you honestly saying that such violations don't happen?

And I have reported specific posts, and I will continue to do so.

 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Disputing a literal interpretation of the Bible, and calling teachings derived from such an interpretation into question (e.g., Young Earth Creationism), is not a violation of the rules.

That is not what I am talking about. I am referring to Christian beliefs such as God created the world and everything in it being called a myth or a fairytale. Such comments ARE a violation of forum rules. And threads that continually end up in debates about Darwinian evolution vs. Creation always bring out at least some of these comments.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You said that calling the Biblical account of creation a myth was an example of such a violation. It's not. Many Christians consider that account to be myth or allegory, while still maintaining that God was somehow ultimately responsible for the creation of the universe. We are allowed to discuss the mythological status of Genesis, even if it trespasses against the theological commitments of some Christians, specifically those whose hermeneutics will not allow them to consider it a myth.
 
Reactions: bhsmte
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I am not naming names, read the conversations on this thread and others in the general sections of this forum. Are you honestly saying that such violations don't happen?

And I have reported specific posts, and I will continue to do so.

Please dont add words to what i write. Did i ever say violations dont happen? I said to give us examples and to report them.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Maybe it would help if you could clarify between mocking Jesus and believing Jesus as a myth.
 
Reactions: Eudaimonist
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.