- Oct 7, 2017
- 251
- 236
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
He even went into how the Pope is insinuating that people accusing the priests are the ones to blame.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is not fruit. It is poop.As Jesus told us " Ye shall know them by their fruits "
Old news, got published several days ago in OBOB.
It's the Catholic part of Christian Forums, where all of this is being discussed about as soon as it breaks. As far as being condescending goes, the following might explain a bit about how we might feel:I have no idea what OBOB is, but thanks for being so condescending.
You can bet it's going to happen. And of course, examples abound in the low church as well, so there's no room for internecine finger-pointing. The way I see it, taking a step back to consider what effect this might have, I think this is going to be a purification of the Body, because clearly the status quo is dramatically unworkable. I think that many Christians are going to be less trusting, and become less dependent, upon religious structures, and more concerned with what has been advanced as the MRI model for what "organic" church should be: incarnational, relational, and missional. I see this as a move toward 1st Century Christianity. That's a good thing, though the birth pangs will not be fun.My biggest worry about all of this is that it allows the reactionary atheists to paint all Christians with the brush of sin caused by the Catholic cover-up.
I have no idea what OBOB is, but thanks for being so condescending.
edit: I guess it's the Catholic sub-forum. I'm not Catholic, but this whole scandal is affecting all Christians and should be discussed by all.
He even went into how the Pope is insinuating that people accusing the priests are the ones to blame.
Why, does your Church have the same issues? What happens in the Roman Church does not concetn me. We left communion with them about a millenium ago.I have no idea what OBOB is, but thanks for being so condescending.
edit: I guess it's the Catholic sub-forum. I'm not Catholic, but this whole scandal is affecting all Christians and should be discussed by all.
This is the first thread that I have seen that is not in OBOB or one of the other Catholic forums. The video is a faithful Catholic giving his perspective. No one is bashing or lashing out.Be that as it may, when people post old stuff about the church with what seems to be a solemn intention of lashing out and bashing the church then it needs to be addressed.
If you dont know what OBOB is after a year at CF may I encourage you to learn more about the plurality of this place?
To pray "Thank God that I am not like XYZ" is horrible.
But this scandal is also horrible, and the handling of it has not been a high point in the Roman Catholic Church's present and recent past. It does also affect other communions, as I have had to deal with more than a few uneducated Muslims and atheists who confuse my Church, the Coptic Orthodox (Egyptian Orthodox) Church with that of the Catholics, because we too have a Pope (currently HH Pope Tawadros II), our priests wear mitres when celebrating the liturgy, we use tons of incense (and Catholicism is often equated in the minds of others as all about "smells and bells"), and so on. Nevertheless we have not been in communion with the Greco-Roman (Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox) churches since c. 451 AD, and more importantly we have never had the problem of mass sexual molestation of children. Our priests can and do marry (and always have; we even once had a married Pope, HH St. Pope Demetrius the Vinedresser, d. 232) and have children like any regular person would, and we do not have the theology that prevents the forced laicization of errant priests as outlined in the Roman Catholic Catechism (CCC 1583). So it is a real problem to everybody, even if it is most specifically a problem of the Roman Catholic Church, or can be argued to be so.
Lest I am misunderstood, I am not saying that all or only RC priests molest children; in the fact, the doorman at the Presbyterian church in which I was raised was revealed to be a pedophile in a trial that sent him to prison for the rest of his natural life when I was around age 14, long after I had stopped attending that particular church. So I know it happens everywhere. I think what people have problem with in the RC case is the perceived cowardice in confronting the problem, as it says in the video: blaming the victims, blaming the faithful Catholics who are anguished over this, etc. What does that do for anybody? It's horrible. Pope Francis should apologize for this and act like a real leader and use his power to get rid of these cardinal and bishop abusers. Cooperate with authorities and if that means they go to jail, then they go to jail.
And if it is true that Pope Francis has personally helped in covering it up...gosh, I don't even know what could be done about that, given the Roman ecclesiology that places the Pope above the ruling of any council (as per Vatican I). Councils have nevertheless been called in the past in the Roman Catholic Church to settle disputes involving the Pope (think of the Council of Constance, which ended the Western Schism in which there were at one time three claimants to the papacy). It seems like evidence of a cover-up could be reason enough to defy your established tradition and call another council to deal with what by any other measure would be called an errant bishop.
It is a challenge to your ecclesiological traditions, sure, but also you must face the reality in which your Church is being ripped apart and its soul exposed as filled with ugliness before the entire world. Sometimes it takes a St. John Chrysostom or St. John the Baptist-type figure (the former having coined the saying that "the road to hell is paved with the skulls of bishops" and the latter famously crying in the desert to make way for the coming of the Lord, and thereby disrupting the established religious order of his day which was not prepared for the coming of the Messiah and hence did not recognize Him when He did come) to stand up, take names, and start cleaning house. Or think of Christ in the temple. He cleansed it by His holy and righteous anger and authority to clean out the rot that had infested it.
Maybe, my beloved former co-religionists (yes, I am a former RC myself), it is time for your own "Jesus cleansing the temple" event. In fact, maybe it is long past time. And if Pope Francis won't do it, despite all the power he is given in accordance with your ecclesiology, maybe he should be the first to go. I hate to say it because I know it will sound like a bitter ex-RC trying to bully people or inject his unwanted opinion, but even if you do see it that way, surely you also see that something must be done. I cannot imagine anyone being fine with this, much less any of the many good and pious Catholics I have know who are deeply (and rightly!) aggrieved by this recurring nightmare of abuse and cover up, abuse and cover up, abuse and cover up ad nauseam, seemingly over the whole world.
Let us not rejoice when a brother falls, but help him up, and pray for the healing of his injury. Lord have mercy. And most of all for the victims, again Lord have mercy.
Justice should prevail even if any Pope or other bishop should fall in the process. Glory be to God for the cleaning of His house then, right?
If that parish is in Antarctica, maybe a workable idea. I'm still working on how or whether an abuser can be rehabilitated. Because we really are all about reconciliation, which doesn't coincide with 'strike one, you're out'. I don't see a path right now, and yet St. Paul was a murderer of Christians. Somehow he was rehabilitated. And yet some are more like Judas, for whom it would have been better if he had not been born.I'm trying to excuse how some good bishops may have ended up "covering up" abuse.
If they trust their priests, the priest swears he haven't done anything wrong and apparent victims have nothing to back up their claims with. Then what is the proper action by a bishop?
May I suggest moving the priest to a different parish?
There's only one way to beat this that I know of, and that's relationship. Christians working alongside each other, worshiping together, confessing together, ought to be growing closer in the Lord. Not everyone is going to be a bosom buddy, but we ought to get to the point where we sense how far we can trust the other guy.I'm trying to excuse how some good bishops may have ended up "covering up" abuse.
If they trust their priests, the priest swears he haven't done anything wrong and apparent victims have nothing to back up their claims with. Then what is the proper action by a bishop?
May I suggest moving the priest to a different parish?