Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I also just read the following from BioLogos...
The third difficulty is the historicity of Adam and Eve. One way to reconcile what current science says about evolution is to propose that the account of Adam and Eve is symbolic, not literal, but what does this do to the New Testament teaching of Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 that our sinfulness comes from our relationship with Adam? If we don’t believe in an historical fall, how did we become what the Bible says we are—sinful and condemned?
Their answer...Make Adam and Eve symbolic and not literal....despite every mention of Adam and Eve in the bible is presented as literal and historical.
In fact Paul in a letter to Timothy in 1 Tim 2:12-13 where Paul instructs women based upon Adam and Eve. It makes no sense Paul would instruct women based upon a symbol.
Tim Keller's suggestion is that Adam was the first human to be endowed with God's image, and that his sin affected his contemporaries as well as his descendants.
Why don't you read Tim Keller's suggestion? He makes it clear that he does think a historical Adam is important.
Why don't you copy and paste it...so I don't have to spend all day trying to find it.
He does, my cut and paste is not working right now or I would give you the quote. All of Christianity is based on becoming like Jesus. I did not put "Jesus is the pinnacle of evolution" in the title because it would have shut down the discussion.I don't believe that is an accurate description of what Collins believes. But anyhoo... the fact remains, evolution doesn't have pinnacles, rungs, or creatures more or less evolved than others. There's just wbat works in a given environment and what doesn't.
If you consider humans to be "higher" on the evolutionary "ladder", take a naked human and drop him on the Antarctic coast with a naked penguin.
I gave a link to it in post 78. It is to a 14 page long PDF.
-57 rolls eyes...then of the 14 pages, which is it on?
-_- these debates are not formal, no one is going to want to read through 14 pages for these discussions.I gave a link to it in post 78. It is to a 14 page long PDF.
According to singularityhub Humans are not the Pinnacle of Evolution they are only a rung on the ladder. According to Theistic Evolution JESUS is the Pinnacle of Evolution.
-_- these debates are not formal, no one is going to want to read through 14 pages for these discussions.
Please, credit given where credit is due, that is at least a double wide. It would have taken two semis hauling to get that fine edifice in place.Here is the diploma mill where he got his doctorate. Looks like a mobile home.
There are lots of people with two year degrees that do a wonderful job of preaching and teaching the Bible.
I know of people that graduated from our sunday school program that can preach the Bible.
But they can not council or advise people. That is when you need a post grad degree.
According to what I am reading he was making between one and two million dollars a year. So when you have that amount of money involved I can see where he could run into a lot of problems. Still if your going to go to court you need a good attorney, someone that gets along with that judge. He had the money to hire an attorney to work out a deal but he did not seem to be smart enough to do that. He does not seem to understand how the good ol boy club works.
Are you kidding? Hovind's "science" is so bad that a high school student could refute it. He has no understanding of anything that he debates. He once made the foolish statement that a teaspoon of water could cover the whole Earth.OH, how typical.....attack the scientist...forget the science.
NEXT
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?