Then you have no evidence.... if loving people is the only way you can show that any of your ideas are true... then you have no evidence.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Its really the only way we can demonstrate the love of the God of our spiritual experience.
The spirit of truth is the conviction of truth, and no, we won't stop no matter how confident you may be in your mechanistic contentions.
And your Love is not founded on the facts of science. Love is not a formula. God is Love.
I thought you said no UFOs. Vehicles? Cabs?Must be a reading comprehension thing. Here, let me guide you through it:
The Transport seraphim brought the Life Carriers to Earth.
With that in mind lets read back through my answer together:
* The common mode of transportation within the grand universe is the "Transport Seraphim". That is to say, they are the transport vehicle. Think of them like a cab. There are trillions of them in a vast universe.
I don't want you to stop... I'm just saying that makes no sense. You think your confidence is the evidence of your claim. That's really stupid. I'm sure you're just brilliant... but that's stupid.
And your Love is not founded on the facts of science. Love is not a formula. God is Love.
....but your lack of evidence in the denial of my claim is supposed to trump my experience just because you made it first even though you cannot provide your evidence. That's rich!
I thought you said no UFOs. Vehicles? Cabs?
Actually my claim is that you have no evidence to provide and that the evidence you attempted to provide isn't evidence at all.... and that you are wrong for saying logic and science shouldn't be allowed to critique you
my claim is that you are inherently fallacious...
....but your lack of evidence in the denial of my claim is supposed to trump my experience just because you made it first even though you cannot provide your evidence. That's rich!
and actually I love people enough to never EVER serve a god that would hurt them for their so called sins... I'm pretty sure I love more than you do.
Your attempt at evidencing your ideas and trying to show you do regard logic and evidence and science consisted of two things
1. You have faith
2. You love people
Those are not evidences of anything except your desires, I don't think we have anything left to discuss. I'm going for lunch.
Science hasn't disproven God.
I claim your Atheism is inherently fallacious because you cannot disprove God. Your doctrines of doubt are just a reverse sort of faith.
A scientist can critique me, but that's not science.
Your hiding place remains safe.
Your conceit is adorable, but I don't believe God hurts people for sin, all sin contains within it the seed of it's own destruction. God didn't design your tongue with nerves because he wants you to bight it off, to the contrary.
Actually a scientific display that your position is inherently fallacious is all the evidence I need to dismiss all your claims.
If your position is inherently illogical... (and it is) then I can logically say it is not true. If you undermine the very principles and rules that you ask that I use to prove you wrong then you have no right to ask and you do not deserve any such consideration. Your position is bunk.
Saying that god shouldn't hurt burn rape and kill people is conceit now? My friend you are the conceited one. You think your god is allowed to do anything it wants toand I can prove to you that yes he has according to your bible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?