- Jun 10, 2010
- 7,562
- 55
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Married
So are you suggesting that the Ark would not have survived such an onslaught?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's great that you envision that to be the way the flood happens. Unfortunately it still ignores everything the Bible says about the circumstances of the Flood and ignores everything that physics says about the mechanisms you propose to cause the Flood to happen.
For example, you ignore the direct, observed evidence I gave of what happened when a small section of two continental plates moved together ~20ft horizontally and 10ft vertically. As a result 1600+ people in the vicinity died and 24 hours later a 35ft high tsunami hit Japan, 10,000 miles away and killed another 138.
Multiply that by a factor of about a million and you can see that the Flood model you are proposing is impossible.
So are you suggesting that the Ark would not have survived such an onslaught?
How would we know what sort of stabilization system may have been on the ark?? You are guessing. Nye knows squat.The ark, if built to the dimensions in the Bible, likely would not have survived even what normally passes as a rough day at sea, let alone a tsunami.
...
The ark, if built to the dimensions in the Bible, likely would not have survived even what normally passes as a rough day at sea, let alone a tsunami.
Bill Nye also explained this during his recent debate with Ken Ham. I don't have the privileges to post video links yet, so someone else will have to link it.
Clam fossils have been found atop Mt. Everest.Hey, this thread reminds me... I've seen plenty of Flood apologists claim there have been fossils found on top of Mount Everest, can anyone actually tell me if this is true? Yes, I know all about geological uplift and all, I'm just curious if this oft repeated factoid has any basis?
Assuming they existed then, they got to Australia the same way they came from Australia to the Ark.I still want to know how the koalas got to Australia after they got of the Ark.
I don't believe in YEC, I believe in Embedded Age, but for the record, here's your "Biblical consistency":Come up with a logically consistent explanation for that's also biblically consistent, I'll accept YEC as correct and evolution as false here and now.
How long, in your opinion, was it before Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego burned up in the fiery furnace?The ark, if built to the dimensions in the Bible, likely would not have survived even what normally passes as a rough day at sea, let alone a tsunami.
Hey, this thread reminds me... I've seen plenty of Flood apologists claim there have been fossils found on top of Mount Everest, can anyone actually tell me if this is true? Yes, I know all about geological uplift and all, I'm just curious if this oft repeated factoid has any basis?
But so there are actually fossils there? Interesting, thanksThey are found *in* the rocks on top. Only a few that have broken loose are on the mountain. As I understand it the summit of the Mt Everest is at least in part limestone moved there by tectonic uplift. That would easily explain the presence of the shells.
Dizredux
But so there are actually fossils there? Interesting, thanks
...so you think they were in Australia before the flood, too? Sure, why not?Assuming they existed then, they got to Australia the same way they came from Australia to the Ark.
Probably by teleportation.
Does the order of the fossils found, from lowest to highest, equate to what Darwinists (or Neo-Darwinists if preferred) would expect to find. Can they therefore say that the order of fossils that we would expect to find from the Noachian flood is inconsistent with the reality?
If they've been suppressed how did you find them?I've found that a lot of geological and archeological studies have been suppressed due to agendas by the mainstream scientific world that would go against the commonly held beliefs. Scientists who present contradictory findings have actually been threatened and lost their 'papers' or status in the community. So, I highly suspect any and all studies until everything is investigated and backed up including the scientists themselves AND their funding sources.
How would we know what sort of stabilization system may have been on the ark?? You are guessing. Nye knows squat.
Did you mean this:
snip ?
How long, in your opinion, was it before Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego burned up in the fiery furnace?
How long, in your opinion, was it before Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego burned up in the fiery furnace?
I keep trying to get you to understand that for the sea floor to rise far enough to spill all the ocean water onto the continents, AND then sink back down again to give the water somewhere to go at the end of the flood, is not going to be a gentle/gradual rise and fall. For the Challenger Deep area to get to that point, it will have to rise at a rate of 240 feet PER DAY. Go outside and find the biggest mountain you can and imagine that mountain growing at 240 feet per day. That is not going to be a slow gradual rise.
Gradual to the continental plates is 2-3 cm per year. 240 feet per day is not gradual, it is a cataclysm.
My model has the sea floor rising uniformly over a vast area, not flattening out as you suggest. The flood story suggests a gradual flood, thus a gradual rise in the sea floor. I suggest viewing some incoming tide video's on u-tube. They provide a good picture of how the flood came in.
For the third time now, there isn't enough water on the planet to cover the mountains of Ararat. If the earth was perfectly smooth, there is only enough water to raise the sea level ~8,600 feet. Mt Ararat itself is nearly twice that tall and many other mountains in the area are taller than that as well.
My model doesn't have the water distributed evenly over the earth. The sea floors would rise enough to cover those mountains with water. The sinking of the continents would help in this. A study of glacial rebound reveals how flexible the earth's crust actually is.
Just as God protected the three men in the fire ...The ark, if built to the dimensions in the Bible, likely would not have survived even what normally passes as a rough day at sea, let alone a tsunami.
How long, in your opinion, was it before Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego burned up in the fiery furnace?
This is relevant because...?
Exactly.Clam fossils have been found atop Mt. Everest.
There's a really good book called Forbidden Archeology by Michael Cremo. Also books by Dr. Robert M. Schoch, Ph.D "Forgotten Civilization: The Role of Solar Outbursts in Our Past and Future."If they've been suppressed how did you find them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?