As per your question, "where was the perfect copy of God's word in Eng;lish before 1611"? I'm not saying there was a monolithic text that was perfect prior to 1611. That is a strawman. The Bible was NOT given as a monolithic text. God guided men throughout history as to what writings were to be considered Scripture. God also guided them to place these SEPARATE writings together as a single volume. I have written extensively on this process, (which is far too large to post here). The purpose of God giving man the ability to both print, and bind books was to present His words to the world. I believe He starting with Erasmus God brought the Greek MSS together to form a pure Greek text, and the culmination of this process is the 1769 KJ. For the record, when the the text went to the printer in 1611 the text was pure, but because of the conditions, and mechanics of the printing process, printing mistakes of various kinds were made in the publication of 1611. The later "editions" of the KJ were only done to 1) correct printing errors; and 2) adjust things like the standardization of spelling, and font use, such as going from a gothic typeface to a Roman typeface.[/qyote]
There were complete English Bibles printed before the KJV, such as the "Great Bible", Geneva, & Bishop's.
I have seen people post the text of the 1611 with the unstandardized spelling (of that day), along with the gothic typeface, (where an "s" looks like an "f", and so forth), and claim that these were "valid" differences (making them errors) in the KJ. That's like saying if I switch from a Roman font to a Formal Script font, (to bring emphasis), then later simply use italics to do the same thing, the former would be an error.
We need to stay on a truthful, and professional course, to examine the history of the Bible.
I don't go for such nonsense as saying the KJV goofed by mentioning singing turtles in Song of Solomon 2:12, as I know "turtle" was a handle for "turtledove" back in the day, as well as referring to the shelled reptile, depending on context. I point out REAL goofs, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4 or "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10.
And again & again I shall keep pointing out the FACT that the KJVO myth is entirely man-made, & doesn't have any Scriptural support, by the least quark of the slightest implication. NO doctrine of faith/worship not found in Scripture at least by clear implication, such as is the "Holy Trinity" doctrine, can be true.