No support. Unless you think finding some proteins/genes/mucins/ in various creatures is support?
Well, of course they do! That's what the research paper is on!

lol!
So if I find a metal rail on a track in a kid's park in St Petersburg Russia, and I find a steel rail on a track in Chicago, does that mean they go the same place/were built by the same people/and carry the same sort of trains?
Possibly, do they have manufacturing marks on them? Stamped with their factory details? are they the same guage? have the same load bearing rating? Same Batch Number?
If I see a twinkle in a star and my girlfriend's eyes, does that mean she is a star? If a rat has eyes, and you have eyes does that make you a rat? Etc
lol! nope!

Are you upset that you're a Eukaryote? Chordate? Vertibrate? Synapsid? Mammal? Ape? Hominid? Which of these do you think you are?
You seem to think merely placing creatures on some evo tree is research? No. The research would be showing that the jellyfish actually was related by birth to man/some supposed mystery ancestor of man and jellyfish etc.
Nope, that's not research... Read the research paper and all the research papers that are referenced, point out where they got it wrong and write your own paper showing this and submit it! That's how Science is Done! Other Scientists go all out to disprove other scientists work, or if they can't, they incorporate it into their own research if it is useful information.
Finally, some quote that you actually think is research. Lets look at it then.
I bolded some quotes. So we take what may be created features of different kinds of animals, and find some sort of common things in various parts of the body. Conclusion: they all must be related and evolved just the right way. You kidding? I mean really???? How long will these vile little rags be called science or research when they are nothing but bad religion?
Nope, you're still failing at Science, I see.... More like "Conclusion: the evidence shows they all seem to be related and evolved just the right way, we can't disprove it." - Nothing is absolute in Science. If it can't be disproven using the scientific method, then it's likely useful information. That's why we live long, high quality lives with easy food supplies and modern conveniences - that's even how you have the ability to whine at me from around the globe at light speed! All because of the exact same scientific method that can't disprove evolution and common ancestry.
And God kept a lot of people safe despite whatever the government thought/said/did. If I recall, they said God was on their side in Germany and the US in WW2? There was a war to end all wars...? Ha. I guess there are people that believe all that rubbish.
Non-sequitur? There's no record of any Gods doing anything during any war, not sure what you're rambling on about at the end there - You can just say you have no comeback, there's no shame in it...
Male and female created He them.
...And what of the living examples we have of Guevedoche, Turnims, Pseudohermaphrodites, Hermaphrodies, Intersex, etc. we have on hand, were they born as such so God could condemn and ignore them for a birth defect and/or genetic condition they were born with?
You must hate being shown how ignorant you are so often... What was your God's plan for these people before we had operations you don't want them to have, Stay in that middleground your God doesn't acknowledge, to be beguiled, ridiculed and shunned for a lifetime of shame and persecution for not being clearly male or female??
I don't believe that. I don't think many involved in the procedure cared, and were about as hell bent as some of the early abortionists to just keep doing what they do.
Little like slavery loving Christians of the south, amirite? Though the amateur efforts of the professional psychiatrists back then were honestly trying to better humanity for everyone involved. When it was apparent it wasn't all that effective, it was rightly discarded voluntarily.
Tell me dad, were slave-beating Christians of the south honestly trying to better humanity for everyone involved, and then when they <ahem> realised it was wrong, discard the practice without force?
Not only slavery but all nations and all people are in sin. You think God likes things just because He does not condemn it in the bible? By the way slavery exists today and is growing. Does that mean you like it?
It's not me who supports slavery in my moral guide book, that's your torch to bear... how on earth did you jump from "slavery is okay in your bible, and this is how to own slaves", to "I love slavery, because Atheism!"? that's a very big leap from nowhere.
In this case the issue is lying to God. If a woman came before God (the priest) and swore she did not commit adultery and was lying...well..there were consequences. What do I take away from this? Do not think you can lie to God. That lesson is repeated elsewhere in the bible also.
Ahh, so you concede Abortion IS condoned in the Bible!

Good job!
Better still, take it as me saying that modern DNA is not related to ancient DNA in the way you thought. You cannot trace anything back further than when this nature started. That makes DNA irrelevant to the origin debate.
Sure we can, and we Have! That's what all those research papers are showing - it isn't the paper that shows this, but the record of physical evidence they're reporting on. We've been able to trace these highly conserved genome sequences back through the tree of life showing that we can't disprove we are related. Given how spectacularly unlikely it is that we (along with all other life descended from the same point) could fluke the same combination of gene sequences in just humans, let alone every animal alive, we have to go with the evidence - no matter how much we don't like it. That's why we consistently get useful practical results from science all the time - by setting aside personal biases and going where the evidence leads.