• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Inspiration of Scripture

What the Bible says, God says.


  • Total voters
    106

Norbert L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 1, 2009
2,856
1,065
✟582,890.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
If God's word is not found in the words of Scripture but through some words of Scripture, then how may we really know what's God's word and what's not?

I fear it boils down to what you prefer, what inspires you, or what tickles your fancy. These things in Scripture are God's word. But the stuff that's distasteful to you? Pffff. Clearly not God's word!

But do you see what we've done there? You no longer have a God who stands over and above you who is able to offend you or contradict you. You are worshipping an idealized version of yourself. This is the real instance of idolatry here. It is not idolatry to accept the words of Scripture as God's words.
It boils down to finding out about how to study the Bible.

Without doing at least some thinking and research into what you're reading in the pages of the Bible, the chances are greater to reach a wrong conclusion. The idealized version of yourself that you're trying so hard to avoid becomes more likely to occur without doing some level of investigation.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The mask of what? Google? You could do the same just like I did and read the same list of things from a site that has an address you like better. It's not like they're going to be any different in the next place you see them, or when you actually look them up in scripture.

Basically, all you really need to do is go to the first two chapters of Genesis and see that the order of creation is different in the two different creation accounts.

For me, that's fine because the message that it was God who created everything still stands even if the writer (or writers) of Genesis got things a bit confused in the details. Since the foundation of my faith is in the person of Jesus Christ rather than in an inerrant book, my faith is still intact when contradictions in the book are pointed out.
The last person who linked me to that terrible site was an atheist. Do you really want to be peddling their sites?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The mask of what? Google? You could do the same just like I did and read the same list of things from a site that has an address you like better. It's not like they're going to be any different in the next place you see them, or when you actually look them up in scripture.

Basically, all you really need to do is go to the first two chapters of Genesis and see that the order of creation is different in the two different creation accounts.

For me, that's fine because the message that it was God who created everything still stands even if the writer (or writers) of Genesis got things a bit confused in the details. Since the foundation of my faith is in the person of Jesus Christ rather than in an inerrant book, my faith is still intact when contradictions in the book are pointed out.
You can find the Living Christ I worship in the Holy Scriptures. You seem to believe He can be found somewhere else.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,709
20,969
Orlando, Florida
✟1,541,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
So he was being deceptive to his own movement to save his own skin?

I think he was human just like the rest of us, and felt pressures just like we do to fit in in his country and his church, and likely even to a greater degree. I'm not an expert on Wesley, though, but I trust that the Methodist church does have genuine expertise on interpreting Wesley's teachings

But now that you mention it, there has always been the story that he was secretly ordained as a bishop by a Greek bishop because to be ordained anything else but Protestant at the time brought a death sentence. So who knows.

Or he really believed such. And this is the correct answer as he did not sputter our rote Theology but can see the Love of Christ in his statements.

Equating loving the Bible with loving Christ seems misguided. I'm not saying that to put down the Scriptures arbitrarily, but as a Lutheran, the Bible will always be a derived authority compared to the person of Jesus Christ. This is something even educated LCMS Lutheran theologians agree with, traditionally, and is not just a liberal stance. Our religion is Christ, we love the Bible because in it we find Christ. But the Bible itself is NOT Christ.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It boils down to finding out about how to study the Bible.

Without doing at least some thinking and research into what you're reading in the pages of the Bible, the chances are greater to reach a wrong conclusion. The idealized version of yourself that you're trying so hard to avoid becomes more likely to occur without doing some level of investigation.
I agree. The issue in our post-modern church culture is that when the Bible is used it is used to support philosophical or social themes. It is used as a tool across the spectrum of manmade ideas.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,709
20,969
Orlando, Florida
✟1,541,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I agree. The issue in our post-modern church culture is that when the Bible is used it is used to support philosophical or social themes. It is used as a tool across the spectrum of manmade ideas.

Dr. David Wagschall would say that people have been doing that for centuries before what you call postmodernism even came along. The istrumentalizing of Scriptures is inherently part of what he calls the Greco-Roman Synthesis, which he frequently critiques.

If anything, postmodern and postliberal approaches to the Bible very much ask us to read the Bible on a deeper level than what many people who criticize it suggest, and not merely to instrumentalize it.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
More from John Wesley:

"Concerning the Scriptures in general, it may be observed, the word of the living God, which directed the first patriarchs also, was, in the time of Moses, committed to writing. To this were added, in several succeeding generations, the inspired writings of the other prophets. Afterward, what the Son of God preached, and the Holy Ghost spake by the apostles, the apostles and evangelists wrote. - This is what we now style the Holy Scripture: this is that word of God which remaineth for ever: of which, though heaven and earth pass away, one jot or tittle shall not pass away. The Scripture therefore of the Old and New Testament, is a most solid and precious system of Divine truth. Every part thereof is worthy of God; and all together are one entire body, wherein is no defect, no excess. It is the fountain of heavenly wisdom, which they who are able to taste, prefer to all writings of men, however wise, or learned, or holy.

An exact knowledge of the truth was accompanied in the inspired writers with an exactly regular series of arguments, a precise expression of their meaning, and a genuine vigor of suitable affections. The chain of argument in each book is briefly exhibited in the table prefixed to it, which contains also the sum thereof, and may be of more use than prefixing the argument to each chapter; the division of the New Testament into chapters having been made in the dark ages, and very incorrectly; often separating things that are closely joined, and joining those that are entirely distinct from each other.

In the language of the sacred writings, we may observe the utmost depth, together with the utmost ease. All the elegancies of human composures sink into nothing before it: God speaks not as man, but as God. His thoughts are very deep: and thence his words are of inexhaustible virtue. And the language of his messengers also is exact in the highest degree: for the words which were given them accurately answered the impression made upon their minds: and hence Luther says, "Divinity is nothing but a grammar of the language of the Holy Ghost." To understand this thoroughly, we should observe the emphasis which lies on every word; the holy affections expressed thereby, and the tempers shown by every writer. But how little are these, the latter especially, regarded? Though they are wonderfully diffused through the whole New Testament, and are in truth a continued commendation of him who acts, or speaks, or writes."

-- from the "Preface" to Explanatory Notes on the New Testament.

Good start, now put it in context with Wesley's focus and you may discover that he is using more classic definitions than the modern idea of God taking control over people's bodies and forcing them to write everything he directly and literally dictates to them. While Wesley believed the bible as the primary (not sole or only) authority (he in actuality referenced many other books as well as the bible), he did not view the bible as a god or as God.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,709
20,969
Orlando, Florida
✟1,541,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Good start, now put it in context with Wesley's focus and you may discover that he is using more classic definitions than the modern idea of God taking control over people's bodies and forcing them to write everything he directly and literally dictates to them. While Wesley believed the bible as the primary (not sole or only) authority (he in actuality referenced many other books as well as the bible), he did not view the bible as a god or as God.

Yes, that's the impression I got as well. He's really speaking more as an Eastern Christian would, not as a 19th century Princeton theologian. Which means his language is doxological rather than following some variant of Scottish Common Sense Realism or 19th century Positivism in its precisions and assumptions
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think he was human just like the rest of us, and felt pressures just like we do to fit in in his country and his church, and likely even to a greater degree. I'm not an expert on Wesley, though, but I trust that the Methodist church does have genuine expertise on interpreting Wesley's teachings

But now that you mention it, there has always been the story that he was secretly ordained as a bishop by a Greek bishop because to be ordained anything else but Protestant at the time brought a death sentence. So who knows.
Do you have evidence Wesley was knowingly misleading his flock because he felt coerced by what exactly? The Anglican inquisition?

Equating loving the Bible with loving Christ seems misguided.
Did I say that. One finds the words of Christ and His teachings in Scriptures.

Did not the Apostle Peter say:

“As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:”

And Isaiah:

“The grass withers, the flower fades,
But the word of our God stands forever.”
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
And this from Wesley:

"My ground is the Bible. Yea, I am a Bible-bigot. I follow it in all things, both great and small."

--From the Journal: "June 5, 1766"


"But the Christian rule of right and wrong is the word of God, the writings of the Old and New Testament; all that the Prophets and "holy men of old" wrote "as they were moved by the Holy Ghost;" all that Scripture which was given by inspiration of God, and which is indeed profitable for doctrine, or teaching the whole will of God; for reproof of what is contrary thereto; for correction of error; and for instruction, or training us up, in righteousness. (2 Timothy 3:16.)

"This is a lantern unto a Christian's feet, and a light in all his paths. This alone he receives as his rule of right or wrong, of whatever is really good or evil. He esteems nothing good, but what is here enjoined, either directly or by plain consequence, he accounts nothing evil but what is here forbidden, either in terms, or by undeniable inference. Whatever the Scripture neither forbids nor conjoins, either directly or by plain consequence, he believes to be of an indifferent nature; to be in itself neither good nor evil; this being the whole and sole outward rule whereby his conscience is to be directed in all things."

--From the Sermons: "The Witness of Our Own Spirit."

Well at least cherry-picking Wesley to try to prove a definition that didn't exist in his time (particularly as he also pointed out contradictions in scripture from time to time) is better than cherry-picking scripture to use as a weapon against other people in the name of God. (Not that I'm accusing you specifically of doing that, but I've seen it quite a bit in general.)
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If anything, postmodern and postliberal approaches to the Bible very much ask us to read the Bible on a deeper level than what many people who criticize it suggest, and not merely to instrumentalize it.
Interesting. Is that why post modern approaches to the Bible go to great lengths to deny God’s inspiration of the texts?
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,709
20,969
Orlando, Florida
✟1,541,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The last person who linked me to that terrible site was an atheist. Do you really want to be peddling their sites?

It's rather prejudicial to dismiss scholarship just because somebody is atheist.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
I’m curious what “other disciplines” means.

Spiritual disciplines, or Means of Grace:
Reading, meditating and studying the scriptures, prayer, fasting, regularly attending worship, healthy living, and sharing our faith with others, regularly share in the sacraments, Christian conferencing (accountability to one another), and Bible study, doing good works, visiting the sick, visiting those in prison, feeding the hungry, and giving generously to the needs of others, seeking justice, ending oppression and discrimination, and addressing the needs of the poor.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,709
20,969
Orlando, Florida
✟1,541,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Interesting. Is that why post modern approaches to the Bible go to great lengths to deny God’s inspiration of the texts?

Do they? Or are they trying to get away from certain understandings of inspiration that inherently imply instrumentality in the Scriptures themselves?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well at least cherry-picking Wesley to try to prove a definition that didn't exist in his time (particularly as he also pointed out contradictions in scripture from time to time) is better than cherry-picking scripture to use as a weapon against other people in the name of God. (Not that I'm accusing you specifically of doing that, but I've seen it quite a bit in general.)
What’s to cherry pick? Those are firm statements unless of course you have quotes or sermons which contradict his own teachings?

Here’s more of the so-called cherry picking:

"And that this is a means whereby God not only gives, but also confirms and increases, true wisdom, we learn from the words of St. Paul to Timothy: 'From a child thou hast known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.' (2 Tim. 3:15) The same truth (namely, that this is the great means God has ordained for conveying his manifold grace to man) is delivered, in the fullest manner that can be conceived, in the words which immediately follow: 'All Scripture is given by inspiration of God;' consequently, all Scripture is infallibly true; "and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; 'to the end "that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.' (2 Tim. 3:16, 17)"


— Sermon #16 "The Means of Grace.”


"All scripture is inspired of God -The Spirit of God not only once inspired those who wrote it, but continually inspires, supernaturally assists, those that read it with earnest prayer. Hence it is so profitable for doctrine , for instruction of the ignorant, for the reproof or conviction of them that are in error or sin, for the correction or amendment of whatever is amiss, and for instructing or training up the children of God in all righteousness ."

--from Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament: "2 Timothy 3:16."




"I am distressed. I know not what to do. I see what I might have done once. I might have said peremptorily and expressly, 'Here I am: I and my Bible. I will not, I dare not, vary from this book, either in great things or small. I have no power to dispense with one jot or tittle what is contained therein. I am determined to be a Bible Christian, not almost, but altogether. Who will meet me on this ground? Join me on this, or not at all.'"


— Sermon #116 "Causes Of The Inefficacy Of Christianity"
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
The last person who linked me to that terrible site was an atheist. Do you really want to be peddling their sites?

My faith is not in danger of being shattered by an atheist site. Besides, who better to point out the inconsistencies than someone who is determined to find as many as possible vs. someone who would prefer to find none and thus pretend there are none?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well at least cherry-picking Wesley to try to prove a definition that didn't exist in his time (particularly as he also pointed out contradictions in scripture from time to time) is better than cherry-picking scripture to use as a weapon against other people in the name of God. (Not that I'm accusing you specifically of doing that, but I've seen it quite a bit in general.)
Which definition did not exist in his time?
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
You can find the Living Christ I worship in the Holy Scriptures. You seem to believe He can be found somewhere else.

Of course. Christ is not limited to a book. He is everywhere and can speak to us in many different ways. If he did not, then having conversations with him through prayer would be pretty useless, as one example.
 
Upvote 0