The Inspiration of Scripture

What the Bible says, God says.


  • Total voters
    106

Loversofjesus_2018

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2018
653
198
33
West coast
✟32,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I dont think an All-Knowing, Perfect, and Good God would permit His Word to be twisted; albeit some have done it, but those things are obvious to those led by the Spirit.
I’ve seen a lot of us say different things all claiming to be led by the spirit. I can’t imagine that there is supposed to be this level of confusion.
 
Upvote 0

Jon Osterman

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2018
716
473
Glasgow
✟59,048.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, they basically are.

If I am remembering correctly, the oldest manuscript was dated at 125AD, and contains portions of John 18. Are you suggesting John lived until 125AD and wrote these himself?
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ok you totally did not understand what I was saying.

I am talking about logic frameworks; not specific family structures.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

I'm back!
Apr 6, 2018
7,356
5,235
25
USA
✟231,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Implying that the "word of God" here means the written portion and not the oral one.
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
If I am remembering correctly, the oldest manuscript was dated at 125AD, and contains portions of John 18. Are you suggesting John lived until 125AD and wrote these himself?

John did not live until 125AD, but he did write the words of the gospel that bears his name.
 
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Loversofjesus_2018

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2018
653
198
33
West coast
✟32,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So it seems I just have to trust them I guess with the most important thing in my life. I still wonder about them. Isn’t it a little weird when people say we have to understand the context when we have no idea if the people we are learning that context from actually knew the context? It just seems to be a lot of I’m good as long as so and so was right.
 
Upvote 0

98cwitr

Lord forgive me
Apr 20, 2006
20,020
3,473
Raleigh, NC
✟449,894.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I’ve seen a lot of us say different things all claiming to be led by the spirit. I can’t imagine that there is supposed to be this level of confusion.

The Lord is not the author of confusion. We either take the Bible for what it says as Gospel (pun intended), or we rip out and bend the parts we don't like so we may fashion a golden calf for ourselves that we are willing to worship.

Paul Washer said these profound words in a sermon once: Everyone wants to go to heaven, but there are few that want God to be there.
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,218
5,563
Winchester, KENtucky
✟308,985.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Did you know that over 33% of the NT is the OT inferred or directly quoted? The "Word of God" (when speaking of the written word) or "Scripture" when mentioned in the NT, is NOT a reference to the NT. Everything messiah did was foretold either directly in prophecy or indirectly through the pictures presented in the Feasts and sacrifices. So when the Apostles, who didn't add or take from what was already Scripture, proclaimed whatever was in the Word of God (again, speaking of that which was written) they were NOT referring to themselves and their own work. Paul did not write a letter to Ephesus thinking we might one day see his work alongside the rest of the canon. He didn't know that, he had no way to know that... and if we remove our bias and just think about it for a minute... we'll find it doesn't change anything other than... it might add a little weight to the OT. But then that is really the issue here even if nobody will be willing to admit to it.

Blessings.
Ken
 
Reactions: FenderTL5
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Here is a bit of a wrench in your works:

Romans 3:1
Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the benefit of circumcision?
2 Great in every respect. First of all, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God.

God entrusted the JEWS with His word. And yes, since the NT writers were all Jewish, that includes the NT as well.

Romans 11 tells us that once God gives something, it is never rescinded.
 
Reactions: Tone
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jon Osterman

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2018
716
473
Glasgow
✟59,048.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
John did not live until 125AD, but he did write the words of the gospel that bears his name.

I'm sure he did. But we don't have his original manuscript, or indeed any of the original manuscripts. Indeed we have manuscripts which differ from one another.
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,218
5,563
Winchester, KENtucky
✟308,985.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Respectfully, it is pagan centered because the Greek culture itself was not Christian... it was polytheist. To use their mindset and try to unlock the Hebraic nature of the scriptures might not be a pagan act, but it is an act that will leave a lot of food on the table God desires for you. And to get it...to get that food, you need to look at Scripture through the eyes of those who penned it. The bible is a Jewish book. While one doesn't need to be Jewish to appreciate or understand it... one does need to consider what is written from that perspective in order to see all there is to see.
 
Upvote 0

Loversofjesus_2018

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2018
653
198
33
West coast
✟32,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So could we take the approach that where the Bible is clear we take it and where it’s no so clear we just say I’m not sure and move on. I find it difficult once we start adding in our own opinions of what scripture means. It’s seems no one wants say I’m not sure. There’s nothing wrong with not being sure in my opinion.
 
Upvote 0

A Realist

Living in Reality
Dec 27, 2018
1,371
1,335
Georgia
✟67,536.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh, Lord. Do I really gotta dig it all up for ya?
It's your assumption, so the burden of proof lies with you.
Here is Berkhof on inspiration - Louis Berkhof on The Inspiration of the Bible

Here is Calvin on inspiration - John Calvin's view of Scripture - Wikipedia

Here is BB Warfield on inspiration - Hodge and Warfield on the Inspiration of the Bible
OK, I must apologize then. It's not your made-up definition. It's obviously a version of the historic definition that had to be created in order to remove fallible men from the picture.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,679
18,559
Orlando, Florida
✟1,262,323.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
ok you totally did not understand what I was saying.

I am talking about logic frameworks; not specific family structures.

Yes, I'm quite aware of the limitations of Aristotilian logic but I simply don't see emphasizing Proverbs view of marriage in contradistinction to the words of Jesus himself as particularly faithful. Jesus is not simply rubber stamping every Jewish cultural value, that implies that Jesus is merely a product of his culture, something that no Christian has believed.

I am not arguing that marriage is a bad thing, not at all (and I think Luther would actually agree with your perspective somewhat, that few have a real calling to celibacy). But it's not what many evangelicals have made it out to be either, where they spend some much effort trying to defend a culturally-conditioned institution that Jesus himself really was more indifferent to than not. It really reflects the medieval Church's desire to meddle in secular affairs more than anything, IMO.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Loversofjesus_2018

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2018
653
198
33
West coast
✟32,008.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I get it. I guess I wanna be 100% certain and I’m trying to figure it all out. Thanks for your input in helping my search.
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I'm sure he did. But we don't have his original manuscript, or indeed any of the original manuscripts. Indeed we have manuscripts which differ from one another.

Not seriously.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,679
18,559
Orlando, Florida
✟1,262,323.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat

If I want to understand the New Testament's 1st century Judaism, I will rely upon the standards of real scholarship and not the presumed religious authority of those that deny the Messiah.

Those in my religious denomination are not ignorant of this sort of background information and we certainly try to be open-minded, but at the same time ,we have confidence in our own confessional identity.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,128
6,906
California
✟61,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
What does it even mean to "believe the Bible". I thought our religion was about believing in Jesus Christ and trusting in him for our salvation?

This reminds me of a post from another thread:

The Logos can speak his Word through scripture, but the Logos is still a person, not an infallible book. God alone is infallible.

*I don't know how this got into my post, but, it seems like it fits, so I'll leave it.

What?
Do you mean THE WORD, JESUS
or do you mean the Word of God...the bible?

I'm talking about the bible.
The bible did not always exist.
Do you think the bible always existed??

*This is the post I was responding to.

Yahshua is the Word of Elohim. I'm talking about everything that exists, which He upholds (including the Bible). What is your point about when the Bible was written?

*From Upon What Basis Do Atheists Claim that Jesus is a Myth?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums