There are no many fields that require extensive computational power. Your presumption is that the others that are working honestly in the field can expose the forgery. However they may not have free supercomputer at hand to run the models several hundreds of times. If the models are publicly available, I mean their source code as a computer simulation. Anyway do you think their simulation software is bug free?Clearly you don't understand science, then. It is very hard for a scientist to lie and get away with it. Your accusation is not only baseless, but is just plain absurd. Never ever has there been a case where you've gotten large numbers of scientists to lie. Always cases of fraud have been isolated situations with a small number of scientists mucking the numbers.
Yes, I will not eat breakfast and will save the money. Probably after 10000 years I will have enough money to buy a super computer...And besides, if you really think these people are lying, you can look at the original research, examine what they did, and see if they actually are lying. This openness is why it's so difficult to lie in science.
It doesn't seem to.I am aware of what we are talking about.
Upvote
0