You got most of that wrong - man compares well to the average of land animals -
over long distances we can outrun pretty much all bar the camel, we can jump over 2 metres, we can swim better than most land mammals (we even have a diving reflex).
Chimps are not 3-5 times stronger, thats a myth.
“There’s this idea out there that chimpanzees are superhuman strong,” says Matthew O’Neill at the University of Arizona in Phoenix. Yet his team’s experiments and computer models show that a chimpanzee muscle is only about a third stronger than a human one of the same size.
This result matches well with the few tests that have been done, which suggest that when it comes to pulling and jumping, chimps are about 1.5 times as strong as humans relative to their body mass. But because they are lighter than the average person, humans can actually outperform them in absolute terms, say O’Neill.
We generally don't live or sleep in trees because we don't need to sleep in trees, but where it's an advantage, we can - e.g.
the Korowai, or Koroway of Indonesia. We can climb with the best of them.
We have survived in the wild for hundreds of thousands of years - there are still tribes that survive entirely with natural materials and food.
We take a long time to develop self-sufficiency because that enables us to maximise our cognitive capabilities and socialization - our major assets. Antelope are prey animals, we are the hunters, and we're the most adaptable mammalian hunter.
As for man never being a wild creature - tell that to the
uncontacted peoples (many of whom are resisting the incursion of 'civilisation' onto their territories).
We have all those capabilities, but generally don't need to use them because we've developed more efficient, or simpler, or easier, or safer, alternatives.
