The Fossil Record Proves Speciation, Not Evolution of Lifeforms Observed

[VirOptimus]

Of course they are not my arguments. Everyone is the same. Unless you are a brilliant scientists that can come up with an original theory then everyone uses other peoples ideas and arguments. Everyone that makes arguments for and against evolution are using someone elses argument. That is the idea of using science to back what you say. You are using an experts findings and not your own views or opinions. I know for a fact if I posted my own views or arguments then you and others will say where is the scientific citation to support what I say.

Yes, but your argumets are to be frank, not scientific, they are religious built on misunderstanding science and misrepresenting articles. You only debate because the ToE doesnt jive with your religiosus faith.

Your conclusion is drawn before you view the data and facts.

 

[Heissonear]

Yes, but your argumets are to be frank, not scientific, they are religious built on misunderstanding science and misrepresenting articles. You only debate because the ToE doesnt jive with your religiosus faith.

Your conclusion is drawn before you view the data and facts.

Many do not understand how something in the biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true if there are no fossil record details between lifeforms that shows evolution never happened.

There are zero fossils that shows step by step morphological changes between lifeforms to prove evolution has occurred. Zero.

The best evolutionist have are macro-collections of fitted fossil sequences, that do not have the morphologically detailed fossils between the said lifeforms. Evolutionists utilize conjecture to conclude macro-assemblages have scientific validity.

All biochemical and biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true without fossil record evidence showing evolution actually happened.

 

[Ophiolite]

Many do not understand how something in the biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true if there are no fossil record details between lifeforms that shows evolution never happened.

Still waiting for you to respond to my question regarding the increase of complexity in ammonites through the Mezozoic, an instance that directly refutes your claim. This is my sixth or seventh request that you address this issue. Your continued non-response is rude and contrary to the spirit of this forum. Please respond.

 

[VirOptimus]

Many do not understand how something in the biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true if there are no fossil record details between lifeforms that shows evolution never happened.

There are zero fossils that shows step by step morphological changes between lifeforms to prove evolution has occurred. Zero.

The best evolutionist have are macro-collections of fitted fossil sequences, that do not have the morphologically detailed fossils between the said lifeforms. Evolutionists utilize conjecture to conclude macro-assemblages have scientific validity.

All biochemical and biological sciences applied to the past cannot be true without fossil record evidence showing evolution actually happened.

Word salad.

Learn some basic science if you want to debate.

 

[stevevw]

Yes, but your argumets are to be frank, not scientific, they are religious built on misunderstanding science and misrepresenting articles. You only debate because the ToE doesnt jive with your religiosus faith.

Your conclusion is drawn before you view the data and facts.

Explain how they are religious and not scientific.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Still waiting for you to respond to my question regarding the increase of complexity in ammonites through the Mezozoic, an instance that directly refutes your claim. This is my sixth or seventh request that you address this issue. Your continued non-response is rude and contrary to the spirit of this forum. Please respond.

If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.

 

[Ophiolite]

If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.

You are almost certainly correct, however, by periodic reminders I give him a chance to restore his integrity, or to continue to injure it. He entitled to believe that evolutionary theory is incorrect. He is not entitled to peddle silly assertions about the evidence.

 

[VirOptimus]

Explain how they are religious and not scientific.

No, thats a fools errand as you dont debate honestly.

 

[stevevw]

No, thats a fools errand as you dont debate honestly.

then all you have said are just mere personal claims with no support.

 

[Heissonear]

then all you have said are just mere personal claims with no support.

Many false personal claims have been pointed attacks towards you. And you respond to each very well.

 

[Heissonear]

If he responded he'd have to admit his error and then could no longer troll with this nonsense. So you won't ever get an honest response.

Maybe your bungy was a bit too long the last time you went out.

Read the title of this thread and topic.

Fossil record and only proof of Species, no morphologically detailed sequences of fossils between lifeforms that shows evolution has occurred.

Are you not facing up to this reality?

 

[Heissonear]

Still waiting for you to respond to my question regarding the increase of complexity in ammonites through the Mezozoic, an instance that directly refutes your claim. This is my sixth or seventh request that you address this issue. Your continued non-response is rude and contrary to the spirit of this forum. Please respond.

Not till you respond to my reiterated request:

Please present the detailed fossils that clearly show morphological changes between two different lifeforms where one lifeform step by step changed into another lifeform over time.

If you do not present such fossils, then what will follow is you present evolution based on conjecture.

And replies will follow of where you stand in promoting evolution.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Maybe your bungy was a bit too long the last time you went out.

Read the title of this thread and topic.

Fossil record and only proof of Species, no morphologically detailed sequences of fossils between lifeforms that shows evolution has occurred.

Are you not facing up to this reality?

Funny that. I gave an example of what you claim doesn't exist in an earlier post and said you'd handwave, deny or ignore the evidence. Looks like I was right - you've ignored it. Again.

Why do so many creationists have to rely on dishonesty? Is it, by any chance, that your position is so untenable that honesty would bring it crashing down? And I'd like an honest answer to this question.

 

[stevevw]

Many false personal claims have been pointed attacks towards you. And you respond to each very well.

Thanks for the support Heissonear