DogmaHunter
Code Monkey
- Jan 26, 2014
- 16,757
- 8,531
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
But that's what it suggests.
No. It makes no mention of "all life" at all.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
But that's what it suggests.
I sure can.But surely then you can answer this because it's no challenge for you:
I'll address it.Sorry dude, none of the things I wrote in my OP are addressed here.
Don't you think it had a profound effect on the evolution of those species that survived, if indeed they did survive?
Here's an answer to part of your challenge:Here is the challenge:
Gladly.Here is the challenge you have to address in this thread:
Fair enough.HERE on this thread it's about the 3 points above mentioned.
Oh no, the brand new life forms that continued on (that just can’t be found in the previous layer) miraculously survived the event that killed off all the other creatures..... in great enough numbers no bottleneck occurred.In others words each destruction event killed all the life in those formations, and evolution had to start over from scratch.
Not when you consider ruin/restoration theory.
Thank you for making my point: There are no Dodo fossils, only subfossils.
Sure thing.But, anyway, back to the thread's topic, shall we?
Gladly.But, cut the crap, in the meantime you better stay on topic:
Fair enough.
Here's an answer to part of your challenge:
Your fossil record doesn't "unambiguously depict a change in biodiversity" -- except on paper.
All it does is show what fossils settled where.
1. Put an inner tube into a swimming pool.
2. Now pour in some marshmallows.
3. Now dump some dirt into the pool.
What's going to happen?
The dirt will take the marshmallows to the bottom with it first.
IF the dirt takes the inner tube with it, it will eventually break free and resurface.
4. Now saturate the pool with dirt and allow it to solidify.
What does your record show?
Marshmallows on the bottom; inner tube halfway down.
Are you saying Last Thursday can be emulated with marshmallows, an inner tube, and a swimming pool?Did he do that Last Thursday by any chance?
I'm saying your objections are senseless.Are you saying Last Thursday can be emulated with marshmallows, an inner tube, and a swimming pool?
It's not an objection.I'm saying your objections are senseless.
No. It's an ad hoc fantasy that only serves as a rather desperate attempt to clinge to a faith based story.It's not an objection.
It's a natural way to explain the fossil record as an aftermath of the Flood.
Oh ... so that scenario can't be tested under controlled conditions?No. It's an ad hoc fantasy that only serves as a rather desperate attempt to clinge to a faith based story.
what scenario?Oh ... so that scenario can't be tested under controlled conditions?
1. Put an inner tube into a swimming pool.what scenario?
1. Put an inner tube into a swimming pool.
2. Now pour in some marshmallows.
3. Now dump some dirt into the pool.
What's going to happen?
The dirt will take the marshmallows to the bottom with it first.
IF the dirt takes the inner tube with it, it will eventually break free and resurface.
4. Now saturate the pool with dirt and allow it to solidify.
What does your record show?
Marshmallows on the bottom; inner tube halfway down.