The Fossil Record- As God Would Have Made It Through Time

[Heissonear]

Okay, first off: drop the attitude. You are sounding very rude and condescending in practically every post you make. So cut it out. Be an adult instead of sounding like a petulant teenager.

And secondly: why should I get educated in paleontology when you can simply SHOW US what the evidence is for your claims.

[QUOTE[You seem to have amiss of this glaring fact. Evolution has no fossil record foundation to prevent sequential remains where such actually happened.

Words from an a debater.

Again, not one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.

Go to the library and read and apprehend paleontology texts.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Words from an a debater. Again, no one fossil sequence showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another. Got it.

Go to the library and read and apprehend paleontology texts.

Except that we can see evidence of fossils showing morphological changes from one lifeform to another. Here's a link!

And I have to say the same thing to you about learning too because you obviously don't know jack yet seem to revel in your ignorance.

 

[Speedwell]

Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.

Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.

And posters are chiming in like such is not true.

And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.

But you have no reputable sources that you can cite in support of such a sweeping claim.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

But you have no reputable sources that you can cite in support of such a sweeping claim.

He's a classic example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. He thinks that he is the reputable source because he's 'educated' (although he never seems to show it), so we just have to take his word for it.

 

[Heissonear]

A (few) transitional fossils.
You act as though people can't look up information online.

Go for it.

But time is required to self apprehend from the physical rock record evidence. Reading summaries of those who believe in evolution does not cut it. Such is why so many are vastly ignorant that Evolution is not supported by the fossil record.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Go for it.

But time is required to self apprehend from the physical rock record evidence. Reading summaries of those who believe in evolution does not cut it. Such is why so many are vastly ignorant that Evolution is not supported by the fossil record.

Did you even look at the website I provided a link to?

 

[tas8831]

Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.

Is it really your position that "billions" of fossils have been found and 'inspected'?

Let us say that inspecting each fossil takes but 1 hour (in reality, it can takes weeks or even years to process a fossil).

1 billion hours = 41.6 million days, or ~114000 years.

And you wrote billionS - is that 2 billion?

Are you really saying that paleontologists have collectively spent 228000 years "inspecting" fossils, and not 1 transitional?

 

[Heissonear]

He's a classic example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. He thinks that he is the reputable source because he's 'educated' (although he never seems to show it), so we just have to take his word for it.

As posted a few posts up, but ignored.

Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.

Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.

Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.

 

[Speedwell]

Go for it.

But time is required to self apprehend from the physical rock record evidence. Reading summaries of those who believe in evolution does not cut it. Such is why so many are vastly ignorant that Evolution is not supported by the fossil record.

You could always go and look at the fossils for yourself. Any reputable university will have tons (literally) of them.

 

[tas8831]

As posted a few posts up, but ignored.

Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.

Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.

Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.

You are implying that YOU have "inspected" the fossil record.

Where can we see your work on fossils?

 

[Heissonear]

Is it really your position that "billions" of fossils have been found and 'inspected'?

Let us say that inspecting each fossil takes but 1 hour (in reality, it can takes weeks or even years to process a fossil).

1 billion hours = 41.6 million days, or ~114000 years.

And you wrote billionS - is that 2 billion?

Are you really saying that paleontologists have collectively spent 228000 years "inspecting" fossils, and not 1 transitional?

Ignorance from a debater.

How did you ever get in such a position?

If you ever stepped foot on the Burlington Formation of Ordovician Period you would realize millions of fossils of principally crinoids, blastoids, and brachiopods. No transition sequence from below, above or inbetween.

Such is the finds in the rock record.

 

[Speedwell]

As posted a few posts up, but ignored.

Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.

Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.

Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.

I notice you are very shy of telling us how you educated yourself about the fossil record.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

As posted a few posts up, but ignored.

Educate yourself of the fossil record, not statements and conclustions from bias supporters of evolutions.

Stop being a debater of what you have misinformation about.

Take the time to at least pick up a paleontology text and time to apprehend what it presents.

Or how about you show us the information that you claim we aren't seeing?!

 

[tas8831]

Ignorance from a debater.

Ignorance?

I merely asked you a question about something YOU wrote.

Diversionary tactics from a creationist that cannot follow their own claims to their logical conclusions.

Did you NOT claim "BILLIONS" of fossils have been found and inspected?

Yes - yes you did.

I am merely asking you about your own claims. If you are too ashamed to admit you wrote that, I will understand.

How did you ever get in such a position - and ignorance of the fossil record?

Well, I don't claim to be an expert on the fossil record, but it is obvious that you are much, much less educated on it than I or any of the other evolutionists in this thread.

So - please cite your own published work on the fossil record, I would like or see if you are for real or just another YEC bluffer.

 

[tas8831]

I notice you are very shy of telling us how you educated yourself about the fossil record.

Clearly, he spent 228000 years "inspecting" the billions of fossils recovered.

 

[Tayla]

Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.

You do not appear to be a trained geologist with experience in what the fossil record shows.

And have thereby missed the gigantic missing evidence that evolution is suppose to be supported by.

Are you saying field geology and paleontology don't support evolution? If so, your argument is with the many experts who support evolution, not with me.

 

[tas8831]

Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.

Since you imply that you have done this, please cite your work.

You do not appear to be a trained geologist with experience in what the fossil record shows.

Nor do you.

And have thereby missed the gigantic missing evidence that evolution is suppose to be supported by.

Why do creationists NEVER present evidence that supports the creation stories in the bible?

It is ALWAYS 'evolution is false because xxx'.

As you imply that you are the world's greatest paleontologist, show us the fossils that support the rapid post-flood diversification of Kinds that yielded today's diversity?

 

[juvenissun]

... I'm going to say this first: I cannot believe that I'm having this conversation, with anyone.
And secondly, because what would be the point? Granted, seeing dinosaurs in heaven would be cool, but since Jesus was the son of God, do you not think that God would have looked at the Earth and gone; "Yeah, this might be a bit too dangerous for him."

You are looking at this issue from a creationist point of view. In the bone, you are not an evolutionist.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You are looking at this issue from a creationist point of view.

No, I'm looking at it from a rational point of view.

In the bone, you are not an evolutionist.

What does that even mean?

 

[juvenissun]

A much, much better question is 'When are creationists going to offer any actual positive, supporting evidence that Salvation, as you claim it, ever happened?'

Now.
I am the supporting evidence.