• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Fossil Record- As God Would Have Made It Through Time

majj27

Mr. Owl has had quite enough
Jun 2, 2014
2,120
2,835
✟97,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
That meteor 65-million years ago that killed them all was actually "judgement day", brought about by Dino-Jesus.

Why not, ey?

Except for the ones that got mysteriously taken up to Heaven. They called it "The Raptor".
 
Upvote 0

tas8831

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2017
5,611
3,999
56
Northeast
✟101,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I always think the fossil "sequence" is a fatal blow to TE people. They can not answer a simple question: Why didn't the Salvation happen, say, in the Permian time, or in the Cretaceous time?

A much, much better question is 'When are creationists going to offer any actual positive, supporting evidence that Salvation, as you claim it, ever happened?'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,434
28,866
Pacific Northwest
✟809,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I get the feeling that some people want to find a fossil of an organism that is somehow "mid-evolutionizing",

"And here we have a trout turning into a toad"

Frog-Fish.png


-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,976
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,976
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
images

That was easy.

Next question?

The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

tas8831

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2017
5,611
3,999
56
Northeast
✟101,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
This is a gorilla skull:

bc-036-lg.jpg


It looks nothing like the top row of skulls.

Maybe this is why you saw creation in anatomy - you didn't actually study it one bit.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
Dude, have you even looked at a gorilla skull before?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You make so many grand claims, but you have never once given a single shred of evidence to back up your claims. You do this in every thread you create.
It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.

You have never understood nor acknowledged the missing fundamental evidence foundation that is missing to support evolution.

And you want replies to such ignorance?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,038
7,403
31
Wales
✟424,466.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.

And so many more learned men and women than you say otherwise.

You have never understood nor acknowledged the missing fundamental evidence foundation that is missing to support evolution.

And what evidence is missing to support evolution?

And you want replies to such ignorance?

Well, people seem to respond to your own ignorance freely...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes there is. What exactly would you expect to see that isn't visible?
Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.

You do not appear to be a trained geologist with experience in what the fossil record shows.

And have thereby missed the gigantic missing evidence that evolution is suppose to be supported by.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.
I'm not sure what a "physical anatomy sequence" is supposed to be. Do you not think that bones, scales, feathers, skin, etc. are a part of anatomy?

You have never understood nor acknowledged the missing fundamental evidence foundation that is missing to support evolution.
I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that not only is the fossil record incomplete, but that it is impossible for it to be complete. -_- some people, such as yourself, apparently think we'd need an example from every generation for the fossil record to support evolution, and it is fine by me if you want to do that, considering that the fossil record is some of the weakest evidence for evolution. Not that it contradicts it, but rather that genetic evidence and evolution experiments are just so much better in terms of evidence.

And you want replies to such ignorance?
I find it funny that you say that, given your lack of actual content in this post. You pretty much just call a person ignorant and leave it at that.
 
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
images

That was easy.

Next question?
Rather than Google and copy from other evolution supporting sites, you might want to investigate the content of what you present.

What you present is pollution of supposed facts.

Evolution in the rock record is a story, unsupported by physical lifeform remains.

You should know this if you were educated in paleontology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,038
7,403
31
Wales
✟424,466.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Rather than Google and copy from other evolution supporting sites, you might want to investigate the what you presented.

What you present is pollution of supposed facts.

Evolution in the rock record is a story, unsupported by physical lifeform remains.

You should know this if you were educated in paleontology.

Or, how about this crazy idea: instead of simply telling us to look for something we don't know about, how about YOU TELL US what is missing?
How about that idea?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
And so many more learned men and women than you say otherwise.



And what evidence is missing to support evolution?



Well, people seem to respond to your own ignorance freely...
Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.

You seem to have amiss of this glaring fact. Evolution has no fossil record foundation to prevent sequential remains where such actually happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.
In fact there are, and references to them are posted in this forum from time to time, but what I would like to know is where you are getting your misinformation from. What are your sources?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,038
7,403
31
Wales
✟424,466.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.

Okay, first off: drop the attitude. You are sounding very rude and condescending in practically every post you make. So cut it out. Be an adult instead of sounding like a petulant teenager.

And secondly: why should I get educated in paleontology when you can simply SHOW US what the evidence is for your claims.

[QUOTE[You seem to have amiss of this glaring fact. Evolution has no fossil record foundation to prevent sequential remains where such actually happened.[/QUOTE]

Except that hundreds of thousands of paleontologists don't support your view and they probably a tonne more credentials than you. So why should I trust some anonymous user on the internet who comes off sounding like a crackpot conspiracy theorist?
And that last sentence makes no sense! How can evolution 'prevent sequential remains'? That phrase makes no sense no matter how I read it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0

Heissonear

Geochemist and Stratigrapher
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2011
4,962
982
Lake Conroe
✟201,642.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.

Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.

And posters are chiming in like such is not true.

And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,038
7,403
31
Wales
✟424,466.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.

Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.

And posters are chiming in like such is not true.

And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.

A (few) transitional fossils.
You act as though people can't look up information online.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dreger
Upvote 0