Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I always think the fossil "sequence" is a fatal blow to TE people. They can not answer a simple question: Why didn't the Salvation happen, say, in the Permian time, or in the Cretaceous time?
Creationists are unable to understand the science.
![]()
That was easy.
Next question?
This is a gorilla skull:The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
Dude, have you even looked at a gorilla skull before?The top row looks like gorilla skulls. Where were these found and how deep in the earth? How many such skulls exist? How were they dated?
It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.You make so many grand claims, but you have never once given a single shred of evidence to back up your claims. You do this in every thread you create.
It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.
You have never understood nor acknowledged the missing fundamental evidence foundation that is missing to support evolution.
And you want replies to such ignorance?
Do your own field geology and look hard at the "data" that is presented in Tree of Life diagrams in paleontology texts.Yes there is. What exactly would you expect to see that isn't visible?
I'm not sure what a "physical anatomy sequence" is supposed to be. Do you not think that bones, scales, feathers, skin, etc. are a part of anatomy?It is quite clear you have not taken paleontology, nor view such texts. There are only presumptions of transitions, no actual physical anatomy sequence in the rock record.
I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that not only is the fossil record incomplete, but that it is impossible for it to be complete. -_- some people, such as yourself, apparently think we'd need an example from every generation for the fossil record to support evolution, and it is fine by me if you want to do that, considering that the fossil record is some of the weakest evidence for evolution. Not that it contradicts it, but rather that genetic evidence and evolution experiments are just so much better in terms of evidence.You have never understood nor acknowledged the missing fundamental evidence foundation that is missing to support evolution.
I find it funny that you say that, given your lack of actual content in this post. You pretty much just call a person ignorant and leave it at that.And you want replies to such ignorance?
Rather than Google and copy from other evolution supporting sites, you might want to investigate the content of what you present.![]()
That was easy.
Next question?
Rather than Google and copy from other evolution supporting sites, you might want to investigate the what you presented.
What you present is pollution of supposed facts.
Evolution in the rock record is a story, unsupported by physical lifeform remains.
You should know this if you were educated in paleontology.
Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.And so many more learned men and women than you say otherwise.
And what evidence is missing to support evolution?
Well, people seem to respond to your own ignorance freely...
In fact there are, and references to them are posted in this forum from time to time, but what I would like to know is where you are getting your misinformation from. What are your sources?Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.
Get educated in paleontology. Got it? Otherwise you may be unkowingly thinking there are real sequences in the rock recored in geographic regions of one lifeform that changes in morphological features into another lifefore.
Many debaters are fossil record ignorant.
Evolution is nissing its prime supportive evidence.
And posters are chiming in like such is not true.
And blind to how the whole stratigraphic column supports how God whould have Created life and how the physical remains support Kinds over historic time. No transitional fossils. Zero, as the billions of found and inspected fossils prove.