Originally posted by alexgb00
One thing i can trust is that the chaplain was a real person (it was Blader who cited it, not i), as opposed to "internet writers," about whom we can't know anything. My sister might as well write a "testimony" impersonating one of Nikita Khruschev's top officers in WWII. And nobody will be the wiser.
How do you know the chaplain was a real person? All I showed you was an internet site. And how do you know that the other ones I cited AREN'T real people? Clearly a double standard. These aren't random anonymous "internet writers." There's references and names and contact information. I even showed you the sources, which were publications and radio. I provided you with contact information. How can you say that you know the chaplain exists but the others don't?
As for me believing sources that support my claim and you believing what supports your claim, i'm not denying that. I said it myself.
Please, speak for yourself. Show me a source, show me a reference that supports your claims, and that is acceptable evidence by me, even if I don't like it. Show me that every single one of these people either do not exist or are lying. I might not like it, but you can't change the facts. I may be arrogant, but I'm not THAT arrogant, thank you. There's a difference between arrogance and blind stubborness.
If what you said about yourself is true, then I see no point in continuing this discussion with you, as reason and evidence is clearly futile and wasted.
Upvote
0